Additionally removed the `arrow-function` feature for
test/language/eval-code/direct/new.target-fn.js as it is not testing
arrow-functions, but they are mentioned in the preamble.
Early errors may result from parsing the source text of a test file, but
they may also result from parsing some other source text as referenced
through the ES2015 module syntax. The latter form of early error is not
necessarily detectable by ECMAScript parsers, however. Because of this,
the label "early" is not sufficiently precise for all Test262 consumers
to correctly interpret all tests.
Update the "phase" name of "early" to "parse" for all those negative
tests that describe errors resulting from parsing of the file's source
text directly. A forthcoming commit will update the remaining tests to
use a "phase" name that is more specific to module resolution.
Authored via the following command:
$ find test -type f -print0 | \
xargs -0 sed \
-i 's/^\(\s*\)negative:\s*SyntaxError\s*$/\1negative:\n\1 phase: early\n\1 type: SyntaxError/g'
ECMA262 allows for an arbitrary number of "ScriptJob"s to run in a given realm.
Although there is no standard mechanism for enqueuing these jobs, many
implementations offer this functionality through custom APIs. In those hosts,
the semantics describing script interactions are directly observable.
In order to guarantee conformance to the specification in advance of a
standardized API, Test262 now requires that hosts provide a $.evalScript
function whose behavior is defined in the project's "INTERPRETING.md" file.
Use this host-provided API to ensure that implementations correctly observe the
specification text that dictates script interactions.
(In writing these tests, I noticed some gaps in coverage that are observable
from a single script execution. This patch includes a dedicated commit for
these tests that do not require $.evalScript.)
* Improve coverage of GlobalDeclarationInstantiation
* Add tests for script interactions
Use the host-provied `$.evalScript` method to assert conformance to the
specification text that defines script interactions.
* fixup! Improve coverage of GlobalDeclarationInstantiation
* Add missing test for early error
* Add missing test for WithBaseObject
* Improve coverage for `new.target`
* Add test for deletion of SuperReference
* Add tests for `in` keyword restrictions
* fixup! Improve coverage for `new.target`
Assert that ImportDeclaration and ExportDeclaration match only the
ModuleItem symbol.
According to the definition of HostResolveImportedModule, it is
acceptable for an implementation to throw a SyntaxError in the event
that a requested module can neither be found nor created:
> If a Module Record corresponding to the pair referencingModule,
> specifier does not exist or cannot be created, an exception must be
> thrown.
In order to reliably detect a SyntaxError in response to the correct
interpretation of the grammar (and not a SyntaxError from an *incorrect*
interpretation of the grammar followed by a failure to resolve the
requested module), the ModuleSpecifier of ExportDeclarations should
describe a valid resource.
Rick Waldron
Leo Balter
Mathias Bynens
Thomas Wood
Mike Pennisi
Kevin Gibbons
Tom Care
Brian Terlson