I used kind of misleading parameter names in this function, they are not
"one" and "two" of the same thing, but a Temporal.PlainDate and a
Temporal.Duration.
Nails down intended behavior of `PlainDate` and
`PlainDateTime`'s `since` that is already true in the
polyfill but which was specified in a buggy way (and hence
potentially not true in an implementation of Temporal).
Add similar tests for Instant, PlainTime, PlainYearMonth, and
ZonedDateTime.
Reference:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1881
Tests for the normative changes made to Temporal in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1873
This adds a new Temporal helper calendar that asserts that its dateAdd()
method is always called with a PlainDate instance. This allows testing
that relativeTo parameters are always converted to PlainDate if they are
not ZonedDateTime and not undefined. Prior to the normative PR, they
would be converted to PlainDateTime instead.
Additionally and optionally, the helper calendar can also assert that its
dateAdd() method is called with a specific PlainDate instance. This allows
testing that the instance is the same PlainDate passed as the relativeTo
parameter (in the case of Duration methods) or is the receiver (in the
case of PlainDate methods). For the PlainDateTime and PlainYearMonth
methods the PlainDate instance is synthesized internally so there is no
need to assert that dateAdd() is called with a specific instance.
A number of tests were found to be duplicative based on an analysis of
file contents (included below). Eliminate the duplication by removing
the version of each test with less precise metadata. In cases where this
removal could technically be considered a reduction in coverage,
preserve the verification of additional semantics in the remaining test.
$ git grep -El 'new\s+\w+.prototype' | sed 's/[^\/]\+$//g' | sort | uniq -c | grep -vE '^\s+1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | xargs grep -Elr 'new\s+\w+.prototype'
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/join/S15.4.4.5_A6.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/join/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/pop/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/pop/S15.4.4.6_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/push/S15.4.4.7_A6.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/push/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/shift/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/shift/S15.4.4.9_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/slice/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/slice/S15.4.4.10_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/sort/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/sort/S15.4.4.11_A7.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/splice/S15.4.4.12_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/splice/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toLocaleString/S15.4.4.3_A4.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toLocaleString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toString/S15.4.4.2_A4.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/unshift/S15.4.4.13_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/unshift/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/S15.3.4.3_A8_T1.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/S15.3.4.3_A8_T2.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/S15.3.4.4_A7_T2.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/S15.3.4.4_A7_T1.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/toString/S15.3.4.2_A7.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/hasOwnProperty/S15.2.4.5_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/hasOwnProperty/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/propertyIsEnumerable/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/propertyIsEnumerable/S15.2.4.7_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toLocaleString/S15.2.4.3_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toLocaleString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toString/not-ctor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/valueOf/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/valueOf/S15.2.4.4_A7.js
The last five lines below are simply WRONG and not according to the spec.
```
const durationFormat = new Intl.DurationFormat();
verifyNotEnumerable(durationFormat, Symbol.toStringTag);
verifyNotWritable(durationFormat, Symbol.toStringTag);
verifyConfigurable(durationFormat, Symbol.toStringTag);
```
Move part of the test of toLocaleString which depends on
15 Amendments to the ECMAScript® 2021 Internationalization API Specification
to intl402. Keep behavior specified in earlier chapters in built-ins
* Add tests for "Intl NumberFormat v3" proposal
This patch is intended to cover only one aspect of the proposal for
ECMA402: the "interpret strings as decimals" feature.
* fixup! Add tests for "Intl NumberFormat v3" proposal
Prior to this commit, the term "harness" was used to refer both to the
like-named directory in the repository and the external projects which
consume the tests. Reserve the term "harness" to refer solely to the
files maintained within this project's `harness/` directory, and use
the term "runner" to refer to the external projects.
Prior to this commit, the term "helper" was not defined and therefore
introduced ambiguity in text that described harness files. Replace the
term with more explicit wording in terms of the harness files.
Because test runners have some leeway in how they include harness files,
the requirement that "[t]he test source code must not be modified in any
way" does not necessarily preclude the use of harness files. Update the
instructions for interpreting the `raw` frontmatter flag to explicitly
disallow harness files.
IANA TimeZone name other than "UTC" is only required if the implementation " includes the ECMA-402 Internationalization API"
https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/#sec-isvalidtimezonename
Therefore, we need to split the test and keep this one without checking "America/Vancouver"
Add a case to test withtout the ":"
This patch is intended to cover only one aspect of the proposal for
ECMA402: the "grouping enum" feature. It also includes coverage for the
formatting option as already defined by the latest version of ECMA402.
Philip Chimento
Jesse Alama
Mike Pennisi
Justin Grant
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
legendecas
Nicolò Ribaudo
rwaldron
Frank Tang
Nikhil Singhal
Sarah GHP
Ms2ger
André Bargull