See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2316 which eliminated
an observable call to Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() in the case where
a calendar's 'fields' property was undefined.
The best way I've thought of to test this is to monkeypatch the
Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() method to make it throw. In some cases,
where we are actually expected to iterate the return value from a
Temporal.TimeZone's getPossibleInstantsFor() method, we have to provide a
custom method for that as well, that returns a non-Array iterable so we
don't call the patched Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]().
This normative change reached consensus at the July 2022 TC39 plenary
meeting.
Since we are going to be adding a new test for calendarName: "critical",
take the existing tests for various values of the calendarName option, and
regularize them. Previously, depending on which type's toString() method
was under test, the tests had various degrees of thoroughness, and some
were only present in staging.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with more than one time zone annotation. These
are not syntactically correct according to the grammar and should be
rejected.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with unrecognized annotations, (i.e., neither
time zone nor calendar), in various combinations with recognized
annotations.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with calendar annotations, with and without the
critical flag, and also a check that the second calendar annotation is
disregarded, as per the IETF draft.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with named and numeric offset time zone
annotations, with and without the critical flag, with various combinations
of Z and offset in front of the annotation.
This adds tests for the normative change in tc39/proposal-temporal#2265,
which adds validation steps to certain abstract operations that call
Temporal.Calendar methods.
These had some duplication with some existing tests named
calendar-returns-infinity.js. Remove these, because the new tests are more
complete in testing what values are accepted.
The existing tests would fail after making the normative change from
tc39/proposal-temporal#2265 because they rely on the getter directly
returning whatever value the calendar method returned. This is no longer
the case, because the value returned by the calendar is validated, so
adjust the assertions in these tests.
Also, no longer any need to return a value from the calendar method that
needs to be converted; we'll add separate tests for that.
Expand these tests to cover all of the PlainDate, PlainDateTime,
PlainMonthDay, PlainYearMonth, and ZonedDateTime property getters that
delegate to the calendar methods.
Many existing tests use a Proxy to test the order of observable operations
on a property bag argument that gets passed in to a Temporal API. I am
going to write several more tests that do this, as well. This seems like a
good thing to put into TemporalHelpers, where it can be implemented
consistently so that we don't get discrepancies in which operations are
tracked. (For example, we had some tests which didn't test for an ownKeys
operation that was supposed to be there.)
Updates existing tests to use this helper.
We did this inconsistently in PlainDate and ZonedDateTime, and not in the
other calendar-carrying types. Additionally, we don't have to create the
calendar explicitly in PlainDate.
The refISOYear argument in the Temporal.PlainMonthDay constructor can
cause a RangeError if it is outside the supported range for PlainDate.
This is part of a normative PR that reached consensus at the July 2022
TC39 plenary:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2266
As of https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2219 the arguments to
the calendar.mergeFields() methods should be null-prototype objects when
called from with() and toPlainDate() methods. This adds tests for that
behaviour.
As of https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2219 the object
returned from the PrepareTemporalFields abstract operation should be a
null-prototype object. There are a number of places where this is
observable in one of the calendar's ...FromFields() methods. This adds
tests for this behaviour everywhere it is observable.
ISO strings may separate the time from the date with a case-insensitive T,
or a space. This adds tests to all entry points that take ISO strings, to
ensure that they accept an uppercase T, lowercase T, or space as the time
separator.
These tests are based on the one test for Temporal.PlainDateTime.from that
was already present.
Some of these strings wouldn't have been valid even with a valid year in
them (e.g. strings ending in +01:00[UTC]) so fix up the strings that we
test. While touching these tests, I took the opportunity to regularize
them, and add some missing ones for ISO strings that convert to Calendar
and TimeZone.
Everywhere an ISO string is accepted in Temporal, a seconds value of :60
should always be coerced to :59, because of how leap seconds are handled
in ISO strings.
In property bags, a 'seconds: 60' property is not subject to that rule: it
should be handled according to the overflow option if there is one.
These tests existed already for some types; regularize them and add the
ones that didn't exist yet.
Each from() method except Calendar and TimeZone should test that when you
pass an instance of that type, the return value is a clone of that
instance, and a distinct object.
These tests existed already for some types; regularize them and add the
ones that didn't exist yet.
In order to test the referenceISODay of a PlainYearMonth we add an
argument to TemporalHelpers.assertPlainYearMonth.
These tests cover, for every API entry point where a Temporal object is
expected, what happens when a value of a different type is passed in that
can't be converted.
Most entry points can convert a string to the expected Temporal type, and
will do ToString on any non-Object argument, and throw RangeError if the
result isn't a string that's convertible to that Temporal type. ToString
will throw TypeError on a Symbol.
Most entry points also take a property bag, and will throw TypeError if
the property bag doesn't have the required properties.
We also have to test for TimeZone and Calendar what happens if the wrong
type is provided as the value of a 'timeZone' or 'calendar' property in
another property bag, up to one level of nested properties.
Adds tests for conversion of a Number whose corresponding toString() value
is a valid ISO string. For some Temporal types this is possible, with a
number like 20220418.
Especially for Temporal.Calendar, we have to take into account the case
where the number is provided as the value for the 'calendar' property in a
property bag, and the case of up to one level of nested property bag as
well.
Regularizes and expands existing tests for this case.
This consolidates the few existing tests for options bags in Temporal
being of the wrong type, and adds them for every entry point in Temporal
that accepts an options bag.
These are mostly identical tests, but there is a variation for methods
like round() where either an options bag or string is accepted.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2090 is a normative change
that reached consensus at the March 2022 TC39 plenary meeting. This adds
tests that verify the change made to the formatting of years between 0 and
999 inclusive in all toString and toJSON methods of Temporal types that
can output an ISO year number in their return value.
Where possible, observable calls originating from within Temporal, that
require an options argument, should pass `undefined` as that options
argument, rather than `{}` or `Object.create(null)`.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#1685.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1910 found a bug in an
indentation level of a line in the Temporal proposal, which affected the
outcome of the PreparePartialTemporalFields abstract operation. This adds
tests for all entry points that use that abstract operation, to make sure
the behaviour is correct: only defined properties are copied in with()
methods.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1753 records the
consensus reached at the October 2021 TC39 meeting to disallow "-000000"
as an extended year, both in Date.parse and Temporal. This adds tests for
the Temporal part of that.
Philip Chimento
Philip Chimento
Aditi
Ms2ger
Ross Kirsling
Iban Eguia Moraza
Jesse Alama
Jesse Alama
Justin Grant
Ms2ger
Frank Tang