These tests add coverage for a corner case in the TZDB. In spring 1919,
the America/Toronto time zone switched to DST at 23:30 on March 30th,
skipping an hour ahead to 00:30 on March 31st. This meant that both March
30th and March 31st were 23.5-hour days.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2910
Tweak some tests to provide coverage of new execution paths in the spec,
such as calling GetOptionsObject inside ToTemporal___; add a few new tests
for things that weren't covered before, such as rounding a PlainDateTime
at the edge of the range; and tweak the tests verifying when the
properties of the options bag are read, which I made a mistake in #4119.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2925
Temporal doesn't specify concrete era names, so tests shouldn't assert
for example that the era code of the current Gregorian era is `"ce"`. We
still want to validate the era names somehow however, so allow alternative
era names using the era codes from the "Intl era and monthCode" proposal.
As in the previous commit, without custom calendars and time zones, some
functionality cannot be tested on implementations that don't have any
other calendars and time zones than iso8601 and UTC.
Some of the staging tests fall in this category. We take the opportunity
to port these into proper tests, in the intl402/ folder.
Previously getISOFields() was used to get the exact value of the
[[Calendar]] and [[TimeZone]] internal slots, as well as to get the
reference ISO year for PlainMonthDay and reference ISO day for
PlainYearMonth.
Use calendarId and timeZoneId for the former and toString() for the
latter.
Without custom calendars and time zones there are actually a bunch of
things that we now can't test on implementations that don't have non-ISO
calendars or non-UTC time zones. (Alternatively, we can say that these are
functionalities that those implementations don't have to implement.)
It's no longer possible to fake built-in time zones using custom objects.
So testing DST shifts will have to use real built-in time zones. Replace
TemporalHelpers.springForwardFallBackTimeZone with America/Vancouver (it
was modelled on the DST transitions in 2000) and
TemporalHelpers.crossDateLineTimeZone with Pacific/Apia (it was modelled
on the 2011 switch to the other side of the international date line.)
These tests have to move to the intl402/ folder since non-Intl-aware
implementations are allowed (but not required) to support any built-in
time zones other than UTC.
In many cases we created a TimeZone or Calendar instance from a built-in
time zone or calendar. These tests can be trivially adapted to just use
the string ID.
Some of the tests can be removed altogether since they deal with what
forms of input can be passed to ToTemporalTimeZoneSlotValue. Those are
tested on every method that takes a TimeZone as input.
Other tests are still relevant, but need to move to ZonedDateTime.p.equals
where the various quirks of time zone equality can still be tested. (Some
of these still will be removed in a following commit because they use
time zone objects.)
See: #2826
Temporarily replace them with getISOFields().calendar/timeZone just to
keep the tests running until we remove Calendar and TimeZone objects
altogether.
See: tc39/proposal-temporal#2826
Following the upstream ECMA-402 change tested in the previous commit, add
test coverage for the corresponding functionality in Temporal. Fix one
test that was erroneous.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825. This is a mass removal of tests that use
this functionality, in a separate commit for ease of review. Further
adjustments will be made in the following commit.
For each Temporal type, add a test (which should not be sensitive to the
exact locale format) that ensures dateStyle affects the output, for a
Gregorian and non-Gregorian calendar.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2058
These tests were supposed to test an invalid ISO string being used as the
`calendar` property in a property bag. Instead they were testing being
used as an invalid ISO string directly where a PlainDate input was needed.
(That is also already covered elsewhere.)
As per IETF, annotation keys may only consist of lowercase letters,
dashes, and digits, and an optional leading underscore. Uppercase letters
are non-syntactical. Add tests covering this.
Time zone identifiers supported by ICU, but which aren't valid IANA
identifiers.
Implementations not supporting ECMA-402 are theoretically allowed to
support these identifiers, so the tests have to go into the "intl402"
directory.
These tests were incorrect, in checking for a RangeError when only one of
the era/eraYear fields were given. From CalendarResolveFields:
"The operation throws a *TypeError* exception if the properties of
_fields_ are internally inconsistent within the calendar or insufficient
to identify a unique instance of _type_ in the calendar."
Built-in non-ISO calendars require either monthCode/day, or month/day plus
some form of year specification.
This adds test coverage for each of the categories listed in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2664, of which some must
currently reside in the test/intl402/ folders.
We'll do this for now, then separately work on migrating all of the tests
that require a non-ISO8601 calendar but aren't dependent on it being any
particular calendar.
Note the monkeypatch of getPossibleInstantsFor in test/built-ins/Temporal/
TimeZone/prototype/getInstantFor/argument-builtin-calendar-no-array-
iteration.js.
Other than that, all the tests are basically identical.
This commit verifies that ISO strings with sub-minute offsets cannot
be parsed into time zone identifiers. This was a change introduced in
the recently-merged tc39/proposal-temporal#2607, but tests for this case
were missing from #3862 (the tests for that PR).
I noticed in codecov results on an unrelated PR that this case wasn't
being tested, so fixing that mistake now.
Edits Temporal tests to account for changes in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2574.
This PR stops coercing non-string primitive inputs to strings
in Temporal methods, to avoid cases where numbers
are coerced to syntactically valid but often unexpected
string results.
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for all direct callers
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2570
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDate
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalZonedDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalYearMonth
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalMonthDay
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToRelativeTemporalObject
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through AddDurationToOrSubtractDurationFromPlainYearMonth
As per IETF review, an IXDTF string (ISO 8601 with annotations) is no
longer valid if it contains more than one u-ca annotation and at least one
of the annotations is marked critical.
Removes tests where such a string was assumed to be valid, and adds new
ones with a few variations on invalid strings.
I wrote a similar test for Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.toLocaleString, so
while this was fresh I decided to do the same for the other toLocaleString
calendar mismatch tests that were in staging.
Philip Chimento
André Bargull
Aditi
Justin Grant
Guillaume Emont