* Add tests for nullable quantifiers in RegExps
The JavaScript semantics for a quantifier matching the empty
string are different from other regex languages.
This adds a test that documents this JavaScript-specific
behavior.
This is part of my work at the SYSTEMF lab at EPFL.
* Update nullable-quantifier.js
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Added missing 'shrink' test for Array.prototype.reduce
* Deleted accidental files
* Fix accidental call of .map instead of .reduce
Addresses review comments
* fix copyright in new file not in origin PR
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Added missing 'shrink' test for Array.prototype.reduceRight
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Adds resizableArrayBufferUtils.js to includes and removes its content
from each test. Also splits tests for .byteLength and .byteOffset to
new files in the respective directories.
Test lines calling .buffer in .../length/resizable-buffer-assorted.js
were not split to .../buffer/ as they seem to only do a check for the
test on .length but perhaps they need to be also split to a new file
.../buffer/resizable-buffer-assorted.js
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while applying review changes from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Some changes for readability.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while applying review changes from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Removes redundant documentation
* Address review comments.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while applying review changes from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Removes forgotten ArrayJoinHelper
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while applying review changes from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Restructures ArrayIndexOfNumOrBigInt to use MayNeedBigInt as it seems clearer.
* Adds missing test file for Array.prototype.indexOf
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Added missing 'shrink' tests for Array.prototype.forEach and removed forgotten lines
Also renames ResizeBufferMidIteration to ResizeMidIteration
* Forgotten by copy paste
Now that we don't have to deal with strings or objects as input to the
calendar ID or time zone ID parameter of constructors, we accept only the
data that actually goes into the internal slots.
Previously getISOFields() was used to get the exact value of the
[[Calendar]] and [[TimeZone]] internal slots, as well as to get the
reference ISO year for PlainMonthDay and reference ISO day for
PlainYearMonth.
Use calendarId and timeZoneId for the former and toString() for the
latter.
Without custom calendars and time zones there are actually a bunch of
things that we now can't test on implementations that don't have non-ISO
calendars or non-UTC time zones. (Alternatively, we can say that these are
functionalities that those implementations don't have to implement.)
These are no longer possible without custom objects. Also add an exception
for calendar and timeZone properties in property bag observers so they are
not treated as objects.
Many tests tested some functionality while asserting that there were no
calls of calendar or time zone methods. We can continue testing the
functionality, but there are no more methods to call, so we can delete
those parts of the tests.
It's no longer possible to fake built-in time zones using custom objects.
So testing DST shifts will have to use real built-in time zones. Replace
TemporalHelpers.springForwardFallBackTimeZone with America/Vancouver (it
was modelled on the DST transitions in 2000) and
TemporalHelpers.crossDateLineTimeZone with Pacific/Apia (it was modelled
on the 2011 switch to the other side of the international date line.)
These tests have to move to the intl402/ folder since non-Intl-aware
implementations are allowed (but not required) to support any built-in
time zones other than UTC.
In many cases we created a TimeZone or Calendar instance from a built-in
time zone or calendar. These tests can be trivially adapted to just use
the string ID.
Some of the tests can be removed altogether since they deal with what
forms of input can be passed to ToTemporalTimeZoneSlotValue. Those are
tested on every method that takes a TimeZone as input.
Other tests are still relevant, but need to move to ZonedDateTime.p.equals
where the various quirks of time zone equality can still be tested. (Some
of these still will be removed in a following commit because they use
time zone objects.)
See: #2826
Temporarily replace them with getISOFields().calendar/timeZone just to
keep the tests running until we remove Calendar and TimeZone objects
altogether.
See: tc39/proposal-temporal#2826
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Import relevant files from #3888
* Removing parts in resizableArrayBufferUtils.js and adding it in includes,
while adjusting usage of CollectValuesAndResize and applying review changes
from PRs for previously tested methods.
* Addresses review comment removing forgoten onlyStrict flag
a62d978ca6 (r1663298683)
This PR proposes changes to existing test262 tests to allow them to pass under Hardened JavaScript (see Secure ECMAScript proposal and Hardened JavaScript). Moddable uses Hardened JavaScript for JavaScript runtimes on resource constrained embedded devices, including those targeted by ECMA-419.
The changes fall into four groups:
1. Replace use of new Date() with new Date(1970). Scripts running inside a Compartment cannot retrieve the current time, so new Date() throws but new Date(1970) succeeds. Very few tests need the current time, but instead simply need a Date instance.
2. Use Object.defineProperty instead of setting existing built-in properties directly, such as toString and toValue. In Hardened JavaScript, prototypes of built-in objects are frozen. Consequently, setting properties of an instance that exist on the prototype throw (Hardened JavaScript is always in strict mode).
3. Eliminate use of Math.random(). Scripts running inside a Compartment cannot generate random numbers. One test identified so far uses Math.random() in a way that can easily be replaced with a counter.
4. Narrow the scope of exception tests. Consider the following
assert.throws(TypeError, () => {
var s1 = new Date();
s1.toString = Boolean.prototype.toString;
s1.toString();
});
This test passes, but only because new Date() fails by throwing a TypeError. If the invocation of the Date constructor is resolved by (1) above, then the assignment to toString fails as per (2) above. The script should be modified as below to ensure that assert.throws only tests the intended statement, s1.toString(). The modified script tests the intended functionality and passes under Hardened JavaScript
var s1 = new Date(1970);
Object.defineProperty(s1, "toString", {
value: Boolean.prototype.toString
});
assert.throws(TypeError, () => {
s1.toString();
});
This is an initial PR to begin the process of adapting test262 for use with Hardened JavaScript. Further changes are expected, with the vast majority likely to fall into the four groups described above.
Thank you to gibson042, kriskowal, and erights for their advice on this work.
Following the upstream ECMA-402 change tested in the previous commit, add
test coverage for the corresponding functionality in Temporal. Fix one
test that was erroneous.
There is no such hidden constructor, it's the same as the hidden
AsyncFunction constructor. In other words:
```js
Object.getPrototypeOf(async () => {}).constructor ===
Object.getPrototypeOf(async function () {}).constructor
```
Also add a test to ensure that %AsyncFunction.prototype% is indeed the
prototype of an async arrow function.
Closes#4044.
* RAB: Integrate staging tests for the .every method
of Array.prototype and TypedArray.prototype
This is part of PR #3888 to make reviewing easier.
Includes changes to use the helper ./harness/resizableArrayBufferUtils.js
* Added missing includes
* Removed unnecessary function call.
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Applied review suggestion to the rest of the files
* Addressed forgotten review comment noting some files are missing.
https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/4074#pullrequestreview-2046589557
Adds forgotten tests from #3888
* Addresses review comment.
* Fixed forgotten rename
* Simplify the tests and add documentation.
New approach replaces ...Helper with CollectResize to make the tests easier to understand.
In particular:
- Replaced the need for '...Helper' abstractions with a more descriptive
function 'ResizeBufferMidIteration', which the .every method can call
directly.
- Moved 'let values' back outside of the loops, together with a function
definition 'ResizeBufferMidIteration' to persist the side effects that
'CollectValuesAndResize' has on 'values' but without having to define
this inside every loop.
+ So this reverts commit d9a2bac41f87f0964a43d34c6f349b6d78401633 and
+ this reverts commit 0bc2d66335671cac56912981b73c7900bf309cee.
- Added documentation.
* Documentation style change and remove accidental additions.
RAB: Integrate staging tests for the .fill method
of Array.prototype and TypedArray.prototype
This is part of PR #3888 to make reviewing easier.
Includes changes to use the helper ./harness/resizableArrayBufferUtils.js
RAB: Integrate staging tests for the .entries method
of Array.prototype and TypedArray.prototype
This is part of PR #3888 to make reviewing easier.
Includes changes to use the helper ./harness/resizableArrayBufferUtils.js
RAB: Integrate staging tests for .copyWithin method
of Array.prototype and TypedArray.prototype
This is part of PR #3888 to make reviewing easier.
Includes changes to use the helper ./harness/resizableArrayBufferUtils.js
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825.
Various edits to existing tests so that they make more sense with the
removal of relativeTo.
New tests specifically testing that calendar units cannot be added or
subtracted directly.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825. This is a mass removal of tests that use
this functionality, in a separate commit for ease of review. Further
adjustments will be made in the following commit.
This covers an edge case that we hit, where 24 hours would not balance up
to one day in a 25-hour day if only largestUnit was specified, but would
erroneously balance up if rounding was also performed by specifying
smallestUnit.
In ZonedDateTime.p.since/until, it's possible for AddDateTime to hit the
limit if the rounding increment is very high, even if the resulting
rounded duration isn't outside of the limit. Add a test covering this
case.
This should produce all the same results (except for a change to weeks
balancing in round(), which is now more consistent with since()/until())
but leads to different observable user code calls.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2742
Aurèle
Lucas Mirelmann
Sosuke Suzuki
Ioanna M Dimitriou H
Ioanna M. Dimitriou H
Ron Buckton
Leo Balter
magic-akari
Marko Lahma
Shu-yu Guo
Chengzhong Wu
André Bargull
Kevin Gibbons
Philip Chimento
Peter Hoddie
Linus Groh
Chengzhong Wu
Adam Shaw
Timothy Leverett
Timothy Flynn
Jordan Harband