While we're at it, use assert() instead of assert.sameValue() for brevity,
if we are not specifically testing that the return value of hasOwnProperty
is the value true or false; and add more informative assertion messages to
help with debugging.
In some cases, the Object.hasOwnProperty.call could be replaced with
verifyProperty(), if the property descriptor was also being verified at
the same time.
This fixes some tests that were faulty to begin with: a common mistake was
Object.hasOwnProperty(obj, prop) which is probably going to return false
when that's not what you want.
The only instances left of `Object.hasOwnProperty` are one regression test
in implementation-contributed which I can't tell if it was intentionally
needed to trigger the regression, and a few instances of
`Object.hasOwnProperty('prototype')` which would defeat the purpose to
convert into `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(Object, 'prototype')`
form.
Closes: #3524
This reverts commit b690cb67be, reversing
changes made to 50dd431dff. This is
necessary because the reverted changeset reduced coverage by an unknown
extent.
Additionally removed the `arrow-function` feature for
test/language/eval-code/direct/new.target-fn.js as it is not testing
arrow-functions, but they are mentioned in the preamble.
A recent change to the specification [1] introduces parse-time errors
for certain usages of `super` within eval code. Modify all tests that
are affected by this change:
- Update the test bodies to accurately enforce the new semantics
- Rename files to better reflect the section of the specification that
they enforce
- Update test meta-data
- Change the `esid` meta-data to reflect the location of the relevant
specification text
- Remove the `es6id` meta-data as the behavior is no longer relatable
to that specification
- Introduce the `features` meta-data in cases where the test file's
new location no longer reflects all required language features
[1] "Normative: Clarify rules around super inside eval"
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/685
* Add tests for prototype realm inference
* Add tests for miscellaneous realm concerns
* Add tests for realm of spec-created Errors
In some cases, Error objects produced by the specification are
observable from ECMAScript code. Among these cases, some are further
differentiated in that they occur outside of any built-in function and
may be triggered through syntactic production directly. The current
realm record is commonly interpreted incorrectly under these
circumstances.
Add tests asserting that the expected realm record is used when
constructing such Error objects.
* Add tests for realm use in ArraySpeciesCreate
* Add tests for function realm retrieval
* Add tests for cross-realm behaviors of Symbols
* Add tests for GetValue and PutValue
* Add tests for realm of spec-created Arrays
In some cases, Arrays produced by CreateArrayFromList are observable
from ECMAScript code. Among these cases, two occur outside of any
built-in function and may be triggered through syntactic production
directly. The current realm record is commonly interpreted incorrectly
under these circumstances.
Add tests asserting that the expected realm record is used when
constructing arrays.
* Add test for spec-created object
* fixup! Add tests for realm of spec-created Errors
* fixup! Add tests for realm of spec-created Errors
* fixup! Add tests for prototype realm inference
* fixup! Add tests for miscellaneous realm concerns
* Improve test coverage for `super` keyword
Add tests for SuperCall and SuperProperty, organized together in the
`test/language/expressions/super/` directory. For SuperProperty, include
tests for usage from within Object initializers and class bodies because
a different set of semantics are observable from each context.
Philip Chimento
rwaldron
Mike Pennisi
Gus Caplan
Leo Balter
Alexey Shvayka
Thomas Wood