For each entry point where a string calendar name is accepted, we should
have a test that ensures the calendar name is case-insensitive. These
tests existed but several were incomplete as they didn't take nested
properties into account, and several entry points were missing this test.
Fix a minor copy-paste issue with double semicolons.
Following up on #3751 and #3762, this commit makes a few tests
work on both CLDR 42 and CLDR 41. Previously these tests were
tied to a specific CLDR 42 format.
While we're at it, use assert() instead of assert.sameValue() for brevity,
if we are not specifically testing that the return value of hasOwnProperty
is the value true or false; and add more informative assertion messages to
help with debugging.
In some cases, the Object.hasOwnProperty.call could be replaced with
verifyProperty(), if the property descriptor was also being verified at
the same time.
This fixes some tests that were faulty to begin with: a common mistake was
Object.hasOwnProperty(obj, prop) which is probably going to return false
when that's not what you want.
The only instances left of `Object.hasOwnProperty` are one regression test
in implementation-contributed which I can't tell if it was intentionally
needed to trigger the regression, and a few instances of
`Object.hasOwnProperty('prototype')` which would defeat the purpose to
convert into `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(Object, 'prototype')`
form.
Closes: #3524
As per the discussion in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2379#issuecomment-1248557100
and the PR https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2398, which is
to be presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting, UTC
offsets and the Z designator should be disallowed after any date-only
strings (YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM, and MM-DD). They should only be allowed to
follow a time component. Z remains disallowed in any string being parsed
into a Plain type.
Annotations become allowed after any ISO string, even YYYY-MM and MM-DD
where they were previously disallowed.
To be presented for consensus in the November/December TC39 meeting. This
adds tests for a 'yearOfWeek' getter to PlainDate, PlainDateTime, and
ZonedDateTime, for use alongside 'weekOfYear', and tests for a
corresponding method to Calendar.
The tests are basically the existing tests of 'weekOfYear' adapted.
Temporal issue: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2405
I discovered these tests had omitted some arguments to the PlainDateTime
constructor, leaving the calendar in the wrong position.
The tests were technically not incorrect, since the operation
ToIntegerThrowOnInfinity on the string "gregory" gives 0. But they could
spuriously pass if the implementation didn't do argument conversion
correctly, failed to throw on eraYear being ±Infinity, but subsequently
threw RangeError anyway because the calendars of the arguments didn't
match.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.Calendar
has its 'calendar' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.Calendar
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalCalendar, with a "poisoned" calendar object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'calendar' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
In these tests, we should make a distinction in the name for clarity. It's
testing a time zone passed as a property in a property bag (either as an
argument, or as a relativeTo option), so name it accordingly as we do with
other tests in the same folder.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2316 which eliminated
an observable call to Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() in the case where
a calendar's 'fields' property was undefined.
The best way I've thought of to test this is to monkeypatch the
Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() method to make it throw. In some cases,
where we are actually expected to iterate the return value from a
Temporal.TimeZone's getPossibleInstantsFor() method, we have to provide a
custom method for that as well, that returns a non-Array iterable so we
don't call the patched Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]().
This normative change reached consensus at the July 2022 TC39 plenary
meeting.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with more than one time zone annotation. These
are not syntactically correct according to the grammar and should be
rejected.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with unrecognized annotations, (i.e., neither
time zone nor calendar), in various combinations with recognized
annotations.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with calendar annotations, with and without the
critical flag, and also a check that the second calendar annotation is
disregarded, as per the IETF draft.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with named and numeric offset time zone
annotations, with and without the critical flag, with various combinations
of Z and offset in front of the annotation.
Temporal tests written for the SpiderMonkey implementation. Mostly
covers edge cases around mathematical operations and regression tests
for reported spec bugs.
This tests the normative change from
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2260
which achieved consensus in the July 2022 TC39 meeting.
The return value from a userland getOffsetNanosecondsFor method is no
longer allowed to be exactly one 24-hour day.
This adds tests that validate a user-callable getOffsetNanosecondsFor to
several APIs that didn't test this yet: ZonedDateTime.since/until, and
Calendar.era/eraYear.
This implements the normative change in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2377 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting.
It changes the order in which observable operations are performed on the
values passed to the ___fromFields methods of Calendar.
1. add the test for "seconds"
2. since the default value for "style" is "long", baseStyle for GetDurationUnitOptions is "long" and therefore the
last argument in testOption should be "long"
3. the valid values for "days" does not contains "numeric", and "2-digit". remove them.
4. the valid values for "milliseconds", "microseconds" and "nanoseconds" does not contains "2-digit". remove it.
See https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#table-duration-components about the valid value
notice the last colum is for "Digital Default" while the baseStyle is "digital" but the set up does not set it that way, the default value for "style" is "long" as in
```
13. Let style be ? GetOption(options, "style", "string", « "long", "short", "narrow", "digital" », "long").
```
of https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat
* Sync to PR 121
Change default from "long" to "short"
Temporal tests written for the SpiderMonkey implementation. Mostly
covers edge cases around mathematical operations and regression tests
for reported spec bugs.
This adds several tests for values that should be produced by the time
zone database and should not be subject to change in the future. This
tests basic functionality of TimeZone.getPlainDateTimeFor with an IANA
time zone database.
Aside from the ones that were already tested in etc-timezones.js, this
adds a test for other IANA legacy names.
Previously these were supported in the TimeZone constructor, but not in
from().
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2292 which is a
normative change that achieved consensus at the July 2022 TC39 meeting.
The Etc/GMT±... time zones should be accepted in from() as well as the
TimeZone constructor. Previously this was not the case for +0 and -0 due
to those being IANA legacy names.
This basically copies the existing test file for the TimeZone constructor,
and performs the same tests for TimeZone.from().
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2292 which is a
normative change that achieved consensus at the July 2022 TC39 meeting.
Romulo Cintra
Timothy Flynn
Richard Gibson
Philip Chimento
Justin Grant
Ms2ger
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
André Bargull
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Philip Chimento
Aditi