This commit verifies that ISO strings with sub-minute offsets cannot
be parsed into time zone identifiers. This was a change introduced in
the recently-merged tc39/proposal-temporal#2607, but tests for this case
were missing from #3862 (the tests for that PR).
I noticed in codecov results on an unrelated PR that this case wasn't
being tested, so fixing that mistake now.
Edits Temporal tests to account for changes in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2574.
This PR stops coercing non-string primitive inputs to strings
in Temporal methods, to avoid cases where numbers
are coerced to syntactically valid but often unexpected
string results.
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for all direct callers
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2570
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDate
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalZonedDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalYearMonth
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalMonthDay
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToRelativeTemporalObject
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through AddDurationToOrSubtractDurationFromPlainYearMonth
The expectation values for the formatToParts are incorrect.
A. The listFormat is consturcted with
6. Perform ! CreateDataPropertyOrThrow(lfOpts, "type", "unit").
so it should not have " and " in the string. Comparing with
(new Intl.ListFormat("en", {type: "unit"})).formatToParts(["a", "b",
"c"]) and
value in the format d and the expected values in the
DurationFormat/prototype/format directory
B. The localized unit values for "short" (and therefore default)
are incorrect. Comparing with the expected values in the
DurationFormat/prototype/format directory
intl402/Locale/constructor-non-iana-canon.js
- Likely subtags entry for "hyw" -> "hyw-Armn-AM" was added to supplemental/likelySubtags.xml
intl402/Locale/prototype/minimize/removing-likely-subtags-first-adds-likely-subtags.js
- Likely subtags entry for "aae" -> "aae-Latn-IT" was added to supplemental/likelySubtags.xml
- Likely subtags entry for "pap" was changed from "pap_Latn_AW" to "pap_Latn_CW"
As per IETF review, an IXDTF string (ISO 8601 with annotations) is no
longer valid if it contains more than one u-ca annotation and at least one
of the annotations is marked critical.
Removes tests where such a string was assumed to be valid, and adds new
ones with a few variations on invalid strings.
I wrote a similar test for Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.toLocaleString, so
while this was fresh I decided to do the same for the other toLocaleString
calendar mismatch tests that were in staging.
In https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2522 which reached
consensus at the March 2023 TC39 meeting, the functionality of
Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.toLocaleString was changed substantially, to not
directly pass the ZonedDateTime to any Intl.DateTimeFormat methods. This
adds rewrites of all existing tests for toLocaleString, as well as a few
tests to verify that Intl.DateTimeFormat methods no longer support
Temporal.ZonedDateTime arguments.
As we are rewriting the tests anyway, this also ports all of the
Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.toLocaleString tests that were in staging, to the
correct format for the main tree.
Previously, "nested" calendar property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
calendar: {
// ...Temporal.Calendar methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the Calendar protocol, but would have
its calendar property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a Calendar protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
Previously, "nested" time zone property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
timeZone: {
// ...Temporal.TimeZone methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the TimeZone protocol, but would have
its timeZone property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a TimeZone protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
This is the replacement of the old API with the new API, .timeZoneId and
.getTimeZone(). Semantics will be corrected in the following commit.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
Compare semantics for custom calendars that _don't_ extend
Temporal.Calendar (and therefore don't have the internal slot) use the
value of the .id property, instead of calling toString().
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
In several tests involving custom calendars, we need to change the
implementation of dateFromFields/monthDayFromFields/yearMonthFromFields so
that the returned object gets the receiver as its calendar after chaining
up to the builtin implementation.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
The Temporal polyfill had a math bug in Calendar.p.dateUntil where
non-ISO calendars would unexpectedly throw when calculating
the number of years between two dates where the year were different,
the month codes were different, but the months were the same because
the earlier date's month was after a leap month.
This test validates the fix to this bug.
The Temporal polyfill had an infinite loop for non-ISO calendars
when Calendar.p.dateUntil was called to calculate the duration
between two identical dates. This test validates that PT0S is returned
in that case.
Tests for the process of calculating the reference ISO day for
Temporal.PlainYearMonth and the reference ISO year for
Temporal.PlainMonthDay.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2475
In https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2474, which achieved
consensus at the TC39 plenary meeting of 2023-01-31, the implementation-
defined steps for Temporal.Calendar.prototype.mergeFields had their
language tightened, to better specify what implementations must do.
This adds tests covering the new spec language, and moves one related test
out of staging.
André Bargull
Yusuke Suzuki
Justin Grant
Ben Allen
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Guillaume Emont
Philip Chimento
Aditi
José Julián Espina
Richard Gibson
Romulo Cintra