test262/src/class-elements/private-field-on-nested-class.case
Shu-yu Guo a31961f7ea Add tests for nested private fields (#2317)
This came up with a V8 bug where private fields weren't resolved
properly from nested classes where both the inner and the outer class
had private fields.
2019-08-29 11:19:47 -03:00

43 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

// Copyright (C) 2019 Shu-yu Guo. All rights reserved.
// This code is governed by the BSD license found in the LICENSE file.
/*---
desc: PrivateName CallExpression usage (private field)
info: |
Updated Productions
CallExpression[Yield, Await]:
CoverCallExpressionAndAsyncArrowHead[?Yield, ?Await]
SuperCall[?Yield, ?Await]
CallExpression[?Yield, ?Await]Arguments[?Yield, ?Await]
CallExpression[?Yield, ?Await][Expression[+In, ?Yield, ?Await]]
CallExpression[?Yield, ?Await].IdentifierName
CallExpression[?Yield, ?Await]TemplateLiteral[?Yield, ?Await]
CallExpression[?Yield, ?Await].PrivateName
template: default
features: [class-fields-private, class-fields-public]
---*/
//- elements
#outer = 'test262';
B_withoutPrivateField = class {
method(o) {
return o.#outer;
}
}
B_withPrivateField = class {
#inner = 42;
method(o) {
return o.#outer;
}
}
//- assertions
let c = new C();
let innerB1 = new c.B_withoutPrivateField();
assert.sameValue(innerB1.method(c), 'test262');
let innerB2 = new c.B_withPrivateField();
assert.sameValue(innerB2.method(c), 'test262');