It is legal that same base name exist in one FPD file. In future, we should use "Guid, Version, Package" and "Arch" to differ a module. So currently, warning should be disabled.

git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@108 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This commit is contained in:
klu2 2006-05-08 03:34:21 +00:00
parent 845fdeba64
commit 19ce77c3e9

View File

@ -373,15 +373,13 @@ public class CollectPCDAction {
if(Token.PCD_USAGE.UNKNOWN != token.isUsageInstanceExist(moduleName)) { if(Token.PCD_USAGE.UNKNOWN != token.isUsageInstanceExist(moduleName)) {
// //
// BUGBUG: It should *not* throw exception here. Becaues in MdePkg.fpd, // BUGBUG: It is legal that same base name exist in one FPD file. In furture
// more than on BaseLib exist. But why? need confirmation. // we should use "Guid, Version, Package" and "Arch" to differ a module.
// So currently, warning should be disabled.
// //
//throw new EntityException( //ActionMessage.warning(this,
// "In module " + moduleName + " exist more than one PCD token " + token.cName // "In module " + moduleName + " exist more than one PCD token " + token.cName
// ); // );
ActionMessage.warning(this,
"In module " + moduleName + " exist more than one PCD token " + token.cName
);
return null; return null;
} }