For function SplitRecord() in file PropertiesTable.c, there is a
potential subtract underflow case for line:
return TotalNewRecordCount - 1;
However, such case will not happen since the logic in function
SplitTable() ensure that when calling SplitRecord(), the variable
'TotalNewRecordCount' will not be zero when performing the subtraction.
It will be handled in the previous if statement:
if (MaxSplitRecordCount == 0) {
CopyMem (NewRecord, OldRecord, DescriptorSize);
return 0;
}
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
This commit makes sure that in function CoreStartImage(), module
variable 'mCurrentImage' is restored to the current start image context
on all code paths.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Currently, the PE/COFF image memory protection code uses the same code
paths for protecting and unprotecting an image. This is strange, since
unprotecting an image involves a single call into the CPU arch protocol
to clear the permission attributes of the entire range, and there is no
need to parse the PE/COFF headers again.
So let's store the ImageRecord entries in a linked list, so we can find
it again at unprotect time, and simply clear the permissions.
Note that this fixes a DEBUG hang on an ASSERT() that occurs when the
PE/COFF image fails to load, which causes UnprotectUefiImage() to be
invoked before the image is fully loaded.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
UEFI executables that consist of a single read+write+exec PE/COFF section
trigger this message, but such a binary layout isn't actually an error.
The image can be launched alright, only image protection cannot be applied
to it fully.
One example that elicits the message is (some) Linux kernels (with the EFI
stub of course).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
When attempting to perform page allocations using AllocateAddress, we
fail to check whether the entire region is free before splitting the
region. This may lead to memory being leaked further into the routine,
when it turns out that one of the memory map entries intersected by the
region is already occupied. In this case, prior conversions are not rolled
back.
For instance, starting from this situation
0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [ConventionalMemory ]
0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
a failed EfiLoaderData allocation @ 0x40000000 that covers the BootData
region will fail, but leave the first part of the allocation converted,
so we end up with
0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [Loader Data ]
0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
even though the AllocatePages() call returned an error.
So let's check beforehand that AllocateAddress allocations are covered
by a single memory map entry, so that it either succeeds or fails
completely, rather than leaking allocations.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Use GLOBAL_REMOVE_IF_UNREFERENCED for some memory profile global variables,
then their symbols could be removed when memory profile is disabled.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Remove the local definitions for the default and runtime page allocation
granularity macros, and switch to the new MdePkg versions.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
This implements a DXE memory protection policy that ensures that regions
that don't require executable permissions are mapped with the non-exec
attribute set.
First of all, it iterates over all entries in the UEFI memory map, and
removes executable permissions according to the configured DXE memory
protection policy, as recorded in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy.
Secondly, it sets or clears the non-executable attribute when allocating
or freeing pages, both for page based or pool based allocations.
Note that this complements the image protection facility, which applies
strict permissions to BootServicesCode/RuntimeServicesCode regions when
the section alignment allows it. The memory protection configured by this
patch operates on non-code regions only.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In preparation of adding memory permission attribute management to
the pool allocator, split off the locking of the pool metadata into
a separate lock. This is an improvement in itself, given that pool
allocations can only interfere with the page allocation bookkeeping
if pool pages are allocated or released. But it is also required to
ensure that the permission attribute management does not deadlock,
given that it may trigger page table splits leading to additional
page tables being allocated.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Instead of assuming that a PE/COFF section of type EFI_IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE
can always be mapped read-only, classify a section as a code section only
if it has the executable attribute set and the writable attribute cleared.
This adheres more closely to the PE/COFF spec, and avoids issues with
Linux OS loaders that may consist of a single read/write/execute section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
If the UEFI image is page aligned, the image code section is set to read
only and the image data section is set to non-executable.
1) This policy is applied for all UEFI image including boot service driver,
runtime driver or application.
2) This policy is applied only if the UEFI image meets the page alignment
requirement.
3) This policy is applied only if the Source UEFI image matches the
PcdImageProtectionPolicy definition.
4) This policy is not applied to the non-PE image region.
The DxeCore calls CpuArchProtocol->SetMemoryAttributes() to protect
the image. If the CpuArch protocol is not installed yet, the DxeCore
enqueues the protection request. Once the CpuArch is installed, the
DxeCore dequeues the protection request and applies policy.
Once the image is unloaded, the protection is removed automatically.
The UEFI runtime image protection is teared down at ExitBootServices(),
the runtime image code relocation need write code segment at
SetVirtualAddressMap(). We cannot assume OS/Loader has taken over
page table at that time.
NOTE: It is per-requisite that code section and data section
should not be not merged. That is same criteria for SMM/runtime driver.
We are not able to detect during BIOS boot, because
we can only get LINK warning below:
"LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.data' (C0000040) merged into
'.text' (60000020) with different attributes"
But final attribute in PE code section is same.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
When gDS->SetMemorySpaceCapabilities() is called,
current DXE core will sync all GCD attributes to memory map
attributes, including RUNTIME attributes.
It is wrong, because RUNTIME attributes should be set for
runtime memory only.
This fix clears the RUNTIME attributes before convert to UEFI
memory map. So that the UEFI memory map is good after
gDS->SetMemorySpaceCapabilities() is called.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
If a BaseAddress of NULL is passed into DXE Core services
CoreAllocateIoSpace() or CoreAllocateMemorySpace(), and
DEBUG() messages are enabled, then a NULL pointer reference
is made. The parameter check for BaseAddress is performed
in the function CoreAllocateSpace() after the DEBUG()
messages. A check is added in the DEBUG() messages to
prevent the NULL pointer reference.
This issue was found with PI SCTs with DEBUG messages
enabled in the DXE Core.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Instead of comparing a GUID with gZeroGuid via the CompareGuid API, the
commit uses the IsZeroGuid API to check if the given GUID is a zero GUID.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@Intel.com>
Code logic ensures that the pointer 'DriverInfoData' will not be NULL when
it is used.
Add ASSERT as warning for case that will not happen.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
- abstrated to abstracted
- accessibla to accessible
- addres to address
- apropriate to appropriate
- arry to array
- availabe to available
- avaliable to available
- becasue to because
- correponding to corresponding
- etablished to established
- exeuction to execution
- extensiable to extensible
- fileds to fields
- loadding to loading
- ptototypes to prototypes
- prococol protocol
- requried to required
- resoruce to resource
- runing to running
- uild to build
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Code logic ensures that both pointers 'DriverInfoData' and 'AllocInfoData'
will not be NULL when they are used.
Add ASSERTs as warning for cases that will not happen.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Implement include GetRecordingState/SetRecordingState/Record for
memory profile protocol.
2. Consume PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask to support disable recording
at the start.
3. Consume PcdMemoryProfileDriverPath to control which drivers need
memory profile data.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
PeiCore EntryPoint library _ModuleEntryPoint() will call PeiCore(), then call
CpuDeadLoop (). When NORETURN is added for PeiCore(), MSVC compiler will report
warning C4702: unreachable code for CpuDeadLoop (). And, the warning is treated
as error and cause build break. DxeMain() has the similar issue.
edk2 uses EntryPoint library to wrap every module entry point function except
for SEC. The module entry point is still called by _ModuleEntryPoint(). So,
there will be negative impact to add NORETURN for the module entry point.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This patch adds the NORETURN attribute to functions that transfer to
other phases, along with an UNREACHABLE() call at the end to avoid
false warnings.
DxeIpl has been excluded as its main function returns a status.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Marvin Haeuser <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This patches rename CoreGetMemoryMapPropertiesTable to
CoreGetMemoryMapWithSeparatedImageSection.
The reason is that CoreGetMemoryMapPropertiesTable is called
by MemoryAttributesTable.c to get separated PE image section
information.
It is confusing to use *PropertiesTable, because it is NOT
related to PropertiesTable.c
We rename it to avoid confusing.
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Set the ImageContext.Handle and ImageContext.ImageRead() fields so that
PeCoffLoaderRelocateImageExtraAction() can invoke PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo
or PeCoffLoaderGetPeHeader if desired to obtain additional metadata.
We will use this to create a PeCoffLoaderRelocateImageExtraAction()
implementation that applies boot time strict mapping permissions to
PE/COFF modules.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Use 128 bytes as the start size region to be same to previous one.
64 bytes is small as the first range. On X64 arch, POOL_OVERHEAD
takes 40 bytes, the pool data less than 24 bytes can be fit into
it. But, the real allocation is few that can't reduce its free pool
link list. And, the second range (64~128) has more allocation
that also increases the free pool link list of the first range.
Then, the link list will become longer and longer. When LinkList
check enable in DEBUG tip, the long link list will bring the
additional overhead and bad performance. Here is the performance
data collected in our X64 platform with DEBUG enable.
64 byte: 22 seconds in BDS phase
128 byte: 19.6 seconds in BDS phase
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
It can improve profile performance, especially when
PcdMemoryProfileMemoryType configured without EfiBootServicesData.
CoreUpdateProfile() can return quickly, but not depend on the further
code to find the buffer not recorded and then return.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The patch uses CoreAcquireLockOrFail() instead of
CoreAcquireProtocolLock() in CoreLocateProtocol() to avoid
assertion when CoreLocateProtocol() is called with the
protocol database locked.
The issue was found when changing PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel to
enable page/pool allocation debug message.
Nt32 platform hangs immediately after DxeCore is loaded.
Investigation shows the following calling stacks:
DxeCore entry point (Install a certain protocol)
0 DxeCore::CoreInstallProtocolInterface // Protocol DB is locked
1 DxeCore::AllocatePool
2 PeiDxeDebugLibReportStatusCode::DebugPrint
3 DxeReportStatusCodeLib::ReportStatusCodeEx // <-------------------|
4 DxeReportStatusCodeLib::InternalGetReportStatusCode |
5 DxeCore::LocateProtocol(StatusCodeRuntimeProtocol) |
// Assertion when locking Protocol DB 2nd time |
6 DxeCore::CoreAcquireProtocolLock |
7 PeiDxeDebugLibReportStatusCode::DebugAssert |
8 DxeReportStatusCodeLib::ReportSatusCodeEx // loop begins ---------
In frame #6 the assertion is triggered due to the protocol database
is already locked. #8 calls #4 and the loop begins.
After changing #6 to CoreAcquireLockOrFail(), the assertion is
avoided and the loop is broken.
With the fix, NT32 can boot to Shell even setting
PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel to 0xFFFFFFFF, with all error levels turned
on.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Current MemoryAttributesTable will be installed on ReadyToBoot event
at TPL_NOTIFY level, it maybe incorrect when PcdHiiOsRuntimeSupport
= TRUE as HiiDatabaseDxe will have runtime memory allocation for HII
OS runtime support on and after ReadyToBoot. The issue was exposed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/10125.
To make sure the correctness of MemoryAttributesTable, this patch is
to enhance MemoryAttributesTable installation to install
MemoryAttributesTable on ReadyToBoot event at TPL_CALLBACK - 1 level
to make sure it is at the last of ReadyToBoot event, and also hook
runtime memory allocation after ReadyToBoot.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The following patch for MemoryAttributesTable will need the memory type.
And CoreUpdateProfile() can also use the memory type for check.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Originally, the code block for "Report DXE Core image information to the PE/COFF
Extra Action Library" was after ProcessLibraryConstructorList(). To fix an issue,
ProcessLibraryConstructorList() was moved to be right after CoreInitializeGcdServices()
at c5d5379937, but the code block was left.
As there maybe PeCoffExtraActionLib implementation need Constructor executed first,
the patch is to move the code block for "Report DXE Core image information to the PE/COFF
Extra Action Library" to be after ProcessLibraryConstructorList.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Check for Type AllocateAddress,
if NumberOfPages is 0 or
if (NumberOfPages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) is above MAX_ADDRESS or
if (Start + NumberOfBytes) rolls over 0 or
if Start is above MAX_ADDRESS or
if End is above MAX_ADDRESS,
return EFI_NOT_FOUND.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
When the DXE core is loaded, it invokes the PeCoffExtraActionLib library
function 'PeCoffLoaderRelocateImageExtraAction' explicitly, which may be
in addition to the same function having been called by the DxeIpl PE/COFF
loader instance.
The ImageContext that DXE core presents to this function is only partially
initialized, which may result in the following output on AArch64 systems:
add-symbol-file ..MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain/DEBUG/DxeCore.dll 0x5F226240
<some intermediate output>
add-symbol-file ..MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain/DEBUG/DxeCore.dll 0x5F226000
This is caused by incorrect data in the ImageContext structure, which means
the start of the .text section is calculated incorrectly. In general, it is
the duty of the caller to present a valid ImageContext structure, so let's
add the missing values before invoking PeCoffLoaderRelocateImageExtraAction().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
If 'CoreGetMemoryMap' return success the 'MemoryMap' shouldn't be NULL.
Add code to make sure this.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Qiu Shumin <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
According to the spec, each entry in the Memory
Attributes table shall have the same type as
the region it was carved out of in the UEFI memory map.
The current attribute uses RTData for PE Data, but
it should be RTCode.
This patch fixed the issue. It is validated with or
without PropertiesTable.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
MemoryAttributesTable generation need information in
PropertiesTable.
In memory attributes table generation path,
PropertiesTable need record original memory map and do
not merge the new memory map entry cross original
memory map boundary.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Add MemoryAttributesTable generation in DxeCore.
We leverage the information collected by original
PropertiesTable, and publish runtime code/data to
another standalone table. So that this is a
compatible solution to report more PE Code/Data
information.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
At the end of CoreFreePoolI(), the check to see if it is a specific
memory type should also cover OEM reserved memory type.
It was missed when adding OEM reserved memory type support at R17460.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
If FV image without DXE depex, it will be dispatched by DxeCore.
If FV image with SMM depex, it is the invalid image. ASSERT will be trig.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signal a closed event will still invoke the event notification function,
it could only be exposed when no the DEBUG_PROPERTY_CLEAR_MEMORY_ENABLED
bit set in PcdDebugPropertyMask.
For example:
gBS->CreateEvent (
EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
TPL_CALLBACK,
CallbackFun,
NULL,
&Event
);
gBS->CloseEvent (Event);
gBS->SignalEvent (Event); <- CallbackFun still be invoked
Although the case to signal a closed event is abnormal, the code could
still be enhanced to avoid it.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19754 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
In DxeCore, use warning message for Runtime driver that doesn't satisfy
section alignment requirement. This check is required when PropertiesTable
is installed. So, add error message if PropertiesTable can't be installed
successfully.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19312 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
In a CloseEvent, an UnregisterProtocolNotify is done unconditionally.
There is a penalty associated with searching the protocol database on
every CloseEvent and impacts performance, especially during Network IO.
Unregister needs to be done only if the Event is for a RegisterProtocolNotify.
So extend the ExFlag in IEVENT to a UINT8 and define new flags that can
be set to indicate if the Event is part of a group, or registered on a
protocol notify. Then in CloseEvent, call UnregisterProtocolNotify only
if the register protocol notify flag is set.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <samer.el-haj-mahmoud@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18517 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Take the range in the resource descriptor HOB for the memory region described
by the PHIT as higher priority if it is big enough. It can make the memory bin
allocated to be at the same memory region with PHIT that has more better compatibility
to avoid memory fragmentation for some code practices assume and allocate <4G ACPI memory.
Also let the minimal memory size needed include the total memory bin size needed to
make sure memory bin could be allocated successfully.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18503 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The HOB List relocation should be at after all the tested memory resources added
(except the memory space that covers HOB List) to the memory services,
because the memory resource found in CoreInitializeMemoryServices()
may have not enough remaining resource for HOB List.
And the memory space that covers HOB List should be processed
after HOB List relocation to avoid the resources allocated by others
to corrupt HOB List before its relocation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18499 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
to right after CoreInitializeGcdServices().
Why?
Some platforms maybe report both below 4G and above 4G memory resource hob as tested,
then CoreInitializeMemoryServices() will find and add the tested above 4G memory resource hob to memory descriptor for early memory allocation services,
then if ProcessLibraryConstructorList() that has library constructor tries to allocate below 4G memory and will fail.
In fact, the following CoreInitializeGcdServices() will add all the memory resource hob to GCD map,
and add the tested below 4G memory resource hob to memory descriptor,
but it has been too late for ProcessLibraryConstructorList().
Also move below two lines as they are needed to be after
the constructor of DxeCorePerfomanceLib.
PERF_END (NULL,"PEI", NULL, 0) ;
PERF_START (NULL,"DXE", NULL, 0) ;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18146 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
GCD Range is byte address. EFI memory range is page address. To make sure
GCD range is converted to EFI memory range, the following things are added:
1. Merge adjacent GCD range first.
2. Add ASSERT check on GCD range alignment.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17813 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The splitting of memory regions into code and data regions violates
architecture specific alignment rules by using a fixed alignment
of 4 KB. Replace it with EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT,
which is defined appropriately on each architecture.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Jaben Carsey" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17812 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Move the definitions of EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT and
DEFAULT_PAGE_ALLOCATION to DxeMain.h to make them available explicitly
to all parts of DxeCore.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17811 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This removes the functions RevertRuntimeMemoryMap () and
DumpMemoryMap () which are not referenced anywhere in the code.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17808 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
UEFI Spec HTTP Boot Device Path, after retrieving the boot resource
information, the BootURI device path node will be updated to include
the BootURI information. It means the device path on the child handle
will be updated after the LoadFile() service is called.
To handle this case, DxeCore LoadImage() service is updated as the below:
1) Get Device handle based on Device Path
2) Call LoadFile() service (GetFileBufferByFilePath() API) to get Load File Buffer.
3) Retrieve DevicePath from Device handle
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17799 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
UEFI2.5 spec, GetMemoryMap(), says:
Attribute: Attributes of the memory region that describe the bit mask
of capabilities for that memory region, and not necessarily the current
settings for that memory region.
But, GetMemoryMap() implementation doesn't append memory capabilities
for MMIO and Reserved memory range. This will break UEFI2.5 Properties
Table feature, because Properties Table need return EFI_MEMORY_RO or
EFI_MEMORY_XP capabilities for OS.
This patch appends memory capabilities for those memory range.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17703 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The correct logic should be:
- The SectionAlignment is got from Magic number.
- The Magic number is got from PE header and machine type.
The original code mix them.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17603 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Use if (Image->Started) condition judgement before call to
UnregisterMemoryProfileImage() in CoreUnloadAndCloseImage().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17597 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
DescEnd will be clipped for alignment in CoreFindFreePagesI, and it
may fall below DescStart, when alignment is more than 16KB (included)
and both DescStart and original DescEnd fall into a single range of
such alignment. This results in a huge size (Negative number in
unsigned type) for this descriptor, fulfilling the allocation
requirement but failing to run ConvertPages; at last it causes
occasional failure of AllocatePages.
A simple comparison is added to ensure we would never get a negative
number.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17575 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The debug message is to print the current TPL and requested TPL value.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17543 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
ARM toolchain raises the build error: "enumerated type mixed with
another type".
To fix the issue, typecase can be used like below.
- return EfiMaxMemoryType + 1;
+ return (EFI_MEMORY_TYPE)(EfiMaxMemoryType + 1);
But to eliminate the confusion, update the return type of
GetProfileMemoryIndex() from EFI_MEMORY_TYPE to UINTN.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17535 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This change will make DEBUG information be aligned with DEBUG_GCD enabled.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17470 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
On AArch64, the OS can choose to run with a page size of 64 KB,
making it cumbersome to deal with UEFI reserved memory regions
whose boundaries are not 64 KB aligned.
So increase the allocation granularity for runtime regions to
64 KB.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17016 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This patch changes the allocation logic for the pool allocator to only
allocate additional pages if the requested allocation cannot be fulfilled
from the current bin or any of the larger ones. If there are larger blocks
available, they will be used to serve the allocation, and the remainder will
be carved up into smaller blocks using the existing carving up logic.
Note that all pool sizes are a multiple of the smallest pool size, so it is
guaranteed that the remainder will be carved up without spilling. Due to the
exponential nature of the pool sizes, the amount of work is logarithmic in
the size of the available block.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17015 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
In preparation of the next patch, that serves allocations from higher-up
bins if the current bin is depleted, this patch updates the carving up
strategy to populate the largest bins first. To ensure that there will
always be an allocation of the appropriate size made, the current allocation
request is served first from the newly allocated memory region.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17014 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
In preparation of making the pool code capable of serving allocations
from higher-up bins, update the free path to traverse a candidate page
by following the index of POOL_FREE header instead of duplicating the
carving logic that was used at page allocation time. This allows chunks
to be split into smaller ones, where one can be returned to serve the
allocation, and the other stored in a smaller bin for later use.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17013 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The existing linear mapping between allocation size and pool index
does not scale when moving to a 64 KB granularity or beyond. With
a granularity of 64 KB, 2048 (!) bins will be created for each
memory type, each differing 32 bytes in size with the next one.
Instead, introduce an exponential scheme where each bin size is
the sum of the two previous ones.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17012 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
After fixing the sanity check on the alignment of the runtime regions
in SVN revision #16630 ("MdeModulePkg/DxeMain: Fix wrong sanity check
in CoreTerminateMemoryMap()"), it is no longer possible to define a
runtime allocation alignment that is different from the boot time
allocation alignment.
For instance, #defining the following in MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Imem.h
will hit the ASSERT () in MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c:1798
#define EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT (SIZE_64KB)
#define DEFAULT_PAGE_ALLOCATION (EFI_PAGE_SIZE)
(which is needed for 64-bit ARM to adhere to the Server Base Boot
Requirements [SBBR], which stipulates that all runtime memory regions
should be naturally aligned multiples of 64 KB)
This patch fixes this use case by ensuring that the backing for the memory
pools is allocated in appropriate chunks for the memory type.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17011 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Modify DxeMain.c which displays incorrect debug message regarding FV Hob.
Specifically, the BaseAddress and Length are not related to the same FV.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16660 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The function CoreTerminateMemoryMap() performs some final sanity checks on the runtime regions in the memory map before allowing ExitBootServices() to complete.
Unfortunately, it does so by testing the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME bit in the Attribute field, which is never set anywhere in the code.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16630 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The traversing of a Memory Mapped FV can overflow the 4GB limit on a 32bit system
during the setting up a Linked List of FFS file inside the FV.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16527 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Hao Wu
Liming Gao
Ard Biesheuvel
Dandan Bi
Laszlo Ersek
Star Zeng
Fu Siyuan
Jiewen Yao
Michael Kinney
Gary Lin
Giri P Mudusuru
Marvin H?user
Ruiyu Ni
Qiu Shumin
Jordan Justen
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
Heyi Guo
Hot Tian