BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3223
In the current design, memory protection is not available till CpuDxe
is loaded. To resolve this, introduce CpuArchLib to move the
CPU Architectural initialization to DxeCore.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED has been officially defined in the PI
1.8 specification. So all temporary solutions have been replaced with
the actual definition.
Cc: Felix Polyudov <felixp@ami.com>
Cc: Dhanaraj V <vdhanaraj@ami.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Ganesh <sachinganesh@ami.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
This patch fix a use-after-free issue where unregistering an
SMI handler could lead to the deletion of the SMI_HANDLER while it is
still in use by SmiManage(). The fix involves modifying
SmiHandlerUnRegister() to detect whether it is being called from
within the SmiManage() stack. If so, the removal of the SMI_HANDLER
is deferred until SmiManage() has finished executing.
Additionally, due to the possibility of recursive SmiManage() calls,
the unregistration and subsequent removal of the SMI_HANDLER are
ensured to occur only after the outermost SmiManage() invocation has
completed.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
The functionality to create and delete Image Records has been
consolidated in a library and ensured that MemoryProtection.c's
usage is encapsulated there.
This patch moves MemoryProtection.c to reuse the code in the lib
and to prevent issues in the future where code is updated in one
place but not the other.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Currently, there are multiple issues when page or pool guards are
allocated for runtime memory regions that are aligned to
non-EFI_PAGE_SIZE alignments. Multiple other issues have been fixed for
these same systems (notably ARM64 which has a 64k runtime page
allocation granularity) recently. The heap guard system is only built to
support 4k guard pages and 4k alignment.
Today, the address returned to a caller of AllocatePages will not be
aligned correctly to the runtime page allocation granularity, because
the heap guard system does not take non-4k alignment requirements into
consideration.
However, even with this bug fixed, the Memory Allocation Table cannot be
produced and an OS with a larger than 4k page granularity will not have
aligned memory regions because the guard pages are reported as part of
the same memory allocation. So what would have been, on an ARM64 system,
a 64k runtime memory allocation is actually a 72k memory allocation as
tracked by the Page.c code because the guard pages are tracked as part
of the same allocation. This is a core function of the current heap
guard architecture.
This could also be fixed with rearchitecting the heap guard system to
respect alignment requirements and shift the guard pages inside of the
outer rounded allocation or by having guard pages be the runtime
granularity. Both of these approaches have issues. In the former case,
we break UEFI spec 2.10 section 2.3.6 for AARCH64, which states that
each 64k page for runtime memory regions may not have mixed memory
attributes, which pushing the guard pages inside would create. In the
latter case, an immense amount of memory is wasted to support such large
guard pages, and with pool guard many systems could not support an
additional 128k allocation for all runtime memory.
The simpler and safer solution is to disallow page and pool guards for
runtime memory allocations for systems that have a runtime granularity
greater than the EFI_PAGE_SIZE (4k). The usefulness of such guards is
limited, as OSes do not map guard pages today, so there is only boot
time protection of these ranges. This also prevents other bugs from
being exposed by using guards for regions that have a non-4k alignment
requirement, as again, multiple have cropped up because the heap guard
system was not built to support it.
This patch adds both a static assert to ensure that either the runtime
granularity is the EFI_PAGE_SIZE or that the PCD bits are not set to
enable heap guard for runtime memory regions. It also adds a check in
the page and pool allocation system to ensure that at runtime we are not
allocating a runtime region and attempt to guard it (the PCDs are close
to being removed in favor of dynamic heap guard configurations).
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4674
Github PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5382
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Per the UEFI spec 2.10, section 2.3.6 (for the AARCH64 arch, other
architectures in section two confirm the same) the memory types that
need runtime page allocation granularity are EfiReservedMemoryType,
EfiACPIMemoryNVS, EfiRuntimeServicesCode, and EfiRuntimeServicesData.
However, legacy code was setting runtime page allocation granularity for
EfiACPIReclaimMemory and not EfiReservedMemoryType. This patch fixes
that error.
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
CodeQL flags the Free Pages logic for not ensuring that
Entry is non-null before using it. Add a check for this
and appropriately bail out if we hit this case.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4697
EvacuateTempRam function will copy the temporary memory context to the rebased
pages and the raw pages. Migrations of rebased PEIMs is from cache to memory,
while raw PEIMs is from memory to memory. So the migrations of raw PEIMs
is slower than rebased PEIMs. Experimental data indicates that changing the source
address of raw PEIMs migration will improve performance by 35%.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Li <zhihao.li@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20240301071147.519-1-zhihao.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
In last patch, we add code support to unregister SMI handler inside
itself. However, the code doesn't support unregister SMI handler
insider other SMI handler. While this is not a must-have usage.
So add check to disallow unregister SMI handler in other SMI handler.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20240301030133.628-3-zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To support unregister SMI handler inside SMI handler itself,
get next node before SMI handler is executed, since LIST_ENTRY that
Link points to may be freed if unregister SMI handler in SMI handler
itself.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20240301030133.628-2-zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
Rename Page5LevelSupported to Page5LevelEnabled.
The variable is set to true in case 5-paging level is enabled (64-bit
PEI) or will be enabled (32-bit PEI), it does *not* tell whenever the
5-level paging is supported by the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20240222105407.75735-3-kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
[lersek@redhat.com: turn the "Cc:" message headers from Gerd's on-list
posting into "Cc:" tags in the commit message, in order to pacify
"PatchCheck.py"]
PcdUse5LevelPageTable documentation says:
Indicates if 5-Level Paging will be enabled in long mode. 5-Level
Paging will not be enabled when the PCD is TRUE but CPU doesn't support
5-Level Paging.
So running in 4-level paging mode with PcdUse5LevelPageTable=TRUE is
possible. The only invalid combination is 5-level paging being active
with PcdUse5LevelPageTable=FALSE.
Fix the ASSERT accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20240222105407.75735-2-kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
[lersek@redhat.com: turn the "Cc:" message headers from Gerd's on-list
posting into "Cc:" tags in the commit message, in order to pacify
"PatchCheck.py"]
RuntimeDxe is used to back the runtime services time functions,
so align the description of the function return values with the
defined values for these services as described in UEFI Spec 2.10.
REF: UEFI spec 2.10 section 8 Services ? Runtime Services
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suqiang Ren <suqiangx.ren@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
CoreConnectSingleController() searches for the Driver Family Override
Protocol drivers by looping and checking each Driver Binding Handles.
This loop can be skipped by checking if any Driver Family Override
Protocol installed in the platform first, to improve the performance.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
CoreGetProtocolInterface() is called by CoreOpenProtocol(),
CoreCloseProtocol() and CoreOpenProtocolInformation().
Before CoreOpenProtocol() calls CoreGetProtocolInterface(), the input
parameter UserHandle has been already checked for validation. So does
CoreCloseProtocol().
Removing the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface()
could improve the performance, as CoreOpenProtocol() is called very
frequently.
To ensure the assumption that the caller of CoreGetProtocolInterface()
must pass in a valid UserHandle that is checked with CoreValidateHandle(),
add the parameter check in CoreOpenProtocolInformation(), and declare
CoreGetProtocolInterface() as static.
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
Provide an optional method for PEI to declare a specific address
range to use for the Memory Type Information bins. The current
algorithm uses heuristics that tends to place the Memory Type
Information bins in the same location, but memory configuration
changes across boots or algorithm changes across a firmware
updates could potentially change the Memory Type Information bin
location. If the bin locations move across an S4 save/resume
cycle, then the S4 resume may fail. Enabling this feature
increases the number of scenarios that an S4 resume operation
may succeed.
If the HOB List contains a Resource Descriptor HOB that
describes tested system memory and has an Owner GUID of
gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid, then use the address range
described by the Resource Descriptor HOB as the preferred
location of the Memory Type Information bins. If this HOB is
not detected, then the current behavior is preserved.
The HOB with an Owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid
is ignored for the following conditions:
* The HOB with an Owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid
is smaller than the Memory Type Information bins.
* The HOB list contains more than one Resource Descriptor HOB
with an owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid.
* The Resource Descriptor HOB with an Owner GUID of
gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid is the same Resource Descriptor
HOB that that describes the PHIT memory range.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yun <yun.y.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Update the DxeMain initialization order to initialize GCD
services before any runtime allocations are performed. This
is required to prevent runtime data fragmentation when the
UEFI System Table and UEFI Runtime Service Table are allocated
before both the memory and GCD services are initialized.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yun <yun.y.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4533
There are use cases which not all FVs need be migrated from TempRam to
permanent memory before TempRam tears down. This new guid is introduced
to avoid unnecessary FV migration to improve boot performance. Platform
can publish MigrationInfo hob with this guid to customize FV migration
info, and PeiCore will only migrate FVs indicated by this Hob info.
This is a backwards compatible change, PeiCore will check MigrationInfo
hob before migration. If MigrationInfo hobs exists, only migrate FVs
recorded by hobs. If MigrationInfo hobs not exists, migrate all FVs to
permanent memory.
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng Sun <chengx.sun@intel.com>
CoreLocateDevicePath is used in CoreInstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces to
check if a Device Path Protocol instance with the same device path is
alreay installed.
CoreLocateDevicePath is a generic API, and would introduce some
unnecessary overhead for such usage.
The optimization is:
1. Implement IsDevicePathInstalled to loop all the Device Path
Protocols installed and check if any of them matchs the given device
path.
2. Replace CoreLocateDevicePath with IsDevicePathInstalled in
CoreInstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces.
This optimization could save several seconds in PCI enumeration on a
system with many PCI devices.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Update DumpImageRecord() to be DumpImageRecords(), and improve
the debug output. The function will output at DEBUG_INFO instead,
and the function will be run in DXE and SMM
MAT logic when the MAT is installed at EndOfDxe on DEBUG builds.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Add logic to create and delete image properties records. Where
applicable, redirect existing code to use the new library.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Now that the bugs are fixed in the MAT logic, we can remove the
duplicate logic from PiSmmCore/MemoryAttributesTable.c and use
ImagePropertiesRecordLib instead.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
