BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3223
In the current design, memory protection is not available till CpuDxe
is loaded. To resolve this, introduce CpuArchLib to move the
CPU Architectural initialization to DxeCore.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@posteo.de>
Comments out a redundant call to RestoreTpl(). While this does not
technically violate spec on raise/restore TPL, TPL should already be at
the specified level. This extra call introduces an asymmetry between
RaiseTpl and RestoreTpl calls, which makes analysis of TPL correctness
more difficult and hampers certain non-standard TPL usages that some
platforms require. Additionally, the two TPL variables were renamed to
provide context for each of them.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lautner <kenlautner3@gmail.com>
Update the DxeMain initialization order to initialize GCD
services before any runtime allocations are performed. This
is required to prevent runtime data fragmentation when the
UEFI System Table and UEFI Runtime Service Table are allocated
before both the memory and GCD services are initialized.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yun <yun.y.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Add PCD to control if modules with start addresses in PE/COFF > 0x100000
attempt to load at specified address.
If a module has an address in this range and there is untested memory
DxeCore will attempt to promote all memory to tested which bypasses any
memory testing that would occur later in boot.
There are several existing AARCH64 option roms that have base addresses
of 0x180000000.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Singhal <ashishsingha@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <bd36c9c24158590db2226ede05cb8c2f50c93a37.1684194452.git.jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4405
The memory attributes table has been extended with a flag that indicates
whether or not the OS is permitted to map the EFI runtime code regions
with strict enforcement for IBT/BTI landing pad instructions.
Given that the PE/COFF spec now defines a DllCharacteristicsEx flag that
indicates whether or not a loaded image is compatible with this, we can
wire this up to the flag in the memory attributes table, and set it if
all loaded runtime image are compatible with it.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
This fixes messages like:
"Image type AARCH64 can't be loaded on <Unknown> UEFI system"
Cc: Daniel Schaefer <git@danielschaefer.me>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@intel.com>
Updates debug macros in the package that have an imbalanced number
of print specifiers to arguments. These changes try to preserve
what was likely intended by the author. In cases information was
missing due to the bug, the specifier may be removed since it was
not previously accurately printing the expected value.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdeModulePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
Update all use of EFI_D_* defines in DEBUG() macros to DEBUG_* defines.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Fix various typos throughout MdeModulePkg.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
EDK2's implementation of the LoadImage() boot service permits non-native
binaries to be loaded (i.e., X64 images on IA32 firmware), but any
attempts to start such an image using StartImage() will return
EFI_UNSUPPORTED.
The integration of the PE/COFF emulator protocol into the DXE core
deviates slightly from this paradigm, given that its IsImageSupported
hook as well as its RegisterImage hook are invoked from LoadImage,
and by the time StartImage is called, no opportunity is given to the
provider of the PE/COFF emulator protocol to prevent an image from
being started if it only supports loading it.
To address this disparity, let's move the invocation of RegisterImage()
to the implementation of the StartImage() boot service, allowing the
emulator to permit LoadImage() but reject StartImage() on images that
turn out not to meet the requirements of the emulator as it is being
started.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2564
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
Currently Framework compatibility is not needed and
PcdFrameworkCompatibilitySupport will be removed from edk2.
So remove the usage of this PCD firstly.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
After commit 57df17fe26, some static check reports suspicious NULL pointer
deference at line:
Entry->MachineType = Entry->Emulator->MachineType;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
within function PeCoffEmuProtocolNotify().
However, 'Entry->Emulator' is guaranteed to have a non-NULL value when
previous call to the CoreHandleProtocol() returns EFI_SUCCESS.
This commit will re-write the return status check for CoreHandleProtocol()
to add explicit NULL pointer check for protocol instance pointer.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Now that the EBC machine type is no longer classified as a
natively supported machine type on the architectures that can
support it via the EBC interpreter, the EBC specific handling
in DXE core is no longer used and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
When encountering PE/COFF images that cannot be supported natively,
attempt to locate an instance of the PE/COFF image emulator protocol,
and if it supports the image, proceed with loading it and register it
with the emulator.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Replace old Perf macros with the new added ones.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765
The UEFI Specification Boot Services chapter, StartImage() service,
EFF 1.10 Extension requires extra calls to ConnectController()
if a UEFI Driver produces handles. The DXE Core is performing these
extra calls to ConnectController() without evaluating the ImageType.
A filter is added to not make extra calls to ConnectController()
if the ImageType is EFI_IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_EFI_APPLICATION.
Without this filter, extra calls to ConnectController() may be
performed by UEFI Applications or a UEFI Shell Applications that
also call ConnectController().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667
reported there is double free pages on LoadImage failure path.
CoreLoadPeImage()
...
return EFI_SUCCESS;
Done:
//
// Free memory.
//
if (DstBufAlocated) {
CoreFreePages (Image->ImageContext.ImageAddress, Image->NumberOfPages);
}
...
CoreUnloadAndCloseImage()
...
if ((Image->ImageBasePage != 0) && FreePage) {
CoreFreePages (Image->ImageBasePage, Image->NumberOfPages);
}
...
This patch is to follow the suggestion at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-August/013112.html
to set Image->ImageContext.ImageAddress and Image->ImageBasePage to 0
after the free in CoreLoadPeImage().
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This commit makes sure that in function CoreStartImage(), module
variable 'mCurrentImage' is restored to the current start image context
on all code paths.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
