REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1391
FSP on-going enhancement for stack utilization required
to know bootloader stack pointer and this pointer can be
retrieved by first input parameter address when FSP-M
entry API invoked by bootloader.
Test: Verified on internal platform and booting successfully
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Added FspMemoryInitDone2, FspTempRamExitDone2, FspSiliconInitDone2
to return error status to Boot Loader for FSP API calls.
To maintain backward compatibility existing functions
(FspMemoryInitDone, FspTempRamExitDone, FspSiliconInitDone)
declaration left untouched.
Cc: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Richard Thomaiyar <richard.marian.thomaiyar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
CarBase and CarSize in Fsp Global data structure are no longer needed as
Boot loader doesn't pass them to FSP even in case that BL chooses to skip calling
the FspTempRamInit API. In case of FspTempramInit is called, we can use the PCDs
to identify the CarBase and Size. Hence we remove the relevant code.
Cc: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Satya Yarlagadda <satya.p.yarlagadda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
In FSP2.0, Boot loader should migrate its temp ram before
calling the tempramexit API to tear down the tempram. so, we don't need the
function to migrate the BL TempRam in the IntelFsp2Pkg.
Cc: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Satya Yarlagadda <satya.p.yarlagadda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Added new funtion in FSPCommonLib to update the FSP API return status with
the requested return status and return the control to the boot loader.
Cc: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Satya Yarlagadda <satya.p.yarlagadda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Add FSP2.0 support.
This series of patch is to support FSP2.0 specification at
https://firmware.intel.com/sites/default/files/FSP_EAS_v2.0_Draft%20External.pdf
Some major updates include:
1) One FSP binary is separated to multiple components:
FSP-T, FSP-M, FSP-S, and optional FSP-O.
Each component has its own configuration data region.
2) All FSP-APIs use same UPD format - FSP_UPD_HEADER.
3) Add EnumInitPhaseEndOfFirmware notifyphase.
4) FSP1.1/FSP1.0 compatibility is NOT maintained.
5) We also add rename Fsp* to FspWrapper* in IntelFsp2WrapperPkg,
to indicate that it is for FspWrapper only.
IntelFspPkg and IntelFspWrapperPkg will be deprecated.
The new Intel platform will follow FSP2.0 and use IntelFsp2Pkg
and IntelFsp2WrapperPkg.
The old platform can still use IntelFspPkg and IntelFspWrapperPkg
for compatibility consideration.
Cc: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Cc: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Ravi P Rangarajan <ravi.p.rangarajan@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ravi P Rangarajan <ravi.p.rangarajan@intel.com>