When the Pcd defined in components section, its value's size is larger
than the value's size in [pcd] section, it cause build error, because
original code use the size get in [pcd] section as max size.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
when multiple driver link same library, and the drivers override the pcd
to different value in the DSC component section, it cause the pcd size
incorrect.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
when driver link library and there have pcd override in DSC component
section, in the library autogen file, the pcd's size is incorrect, the
size value is from DSC [pcd] section, but not from the override pcd
value that in the [component] section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The case is a FixedAtBuild VOID* PCD is used from a lib, but is set to a
different sized value in a module INF scope <PcdsFixedAtBuild> section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
FDF format as below:
FILE APPLICATION = PCD(PcdToken.PcdCName) {
}
when parse PCD, need get all PCDs from Platform and Packages,
use self.BuildObject[self.Platform, Arch] get some modules is wrong.
so use self.BuildObject[self.Platform, Arch, TargetName, ToolChainTag]
get all modules.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yunhua Feng <yunhuax.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
some were populated, but never used after.
some were never used.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
As we never use the values, just keep the keys in a set.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
switch list to set:
1)we dont care about order
2)we only check for membership.
then remove ".keys()" from dict looping:
allow generators opportunity to optimize
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
The Pcd used in [Components] section, the PCD value is displayed
incorrect in the build report because the PCD default value was not
override.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Pcds in Conditional Directives and Pcds not used are Platform Level
info, it should not display in Module PCD Section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
It is caused by 0c9f2cb10b
and false positive.
Initialize CpuArchAttributes to suppress incorrect
compiler/analyzer warnings.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
by changing from list to set(), we can skip all the preprocessing
to prevent duplication and we dont need to convert to a set() later
on for each use
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
make it easy to import and use by others
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
The RegEx matches begining and end of the string, dont then check length.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
since we need order and a default entry, use collections dicts to
auto generate.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
we initialize this dict and then check it's contents, but never add items.
we can remove it without any effect.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
This patch fixes an issue with VlvTbltDevicePkg introduced
by commit 5b91bf82c6.
The history is as below.
To support heap guard feature, 14dde9e903
added support for SetMemorySpaceAttributes() to handle page attributes,
but after that, a combination of CPU arch attributes and other attributes
was not allowed anymore, for example, UC + RUNTIME. It is a regression.
Then 5b91bf82c6 was to fix the regression,
and we thought 0 CPU arch attributes may be used to clear CPU arch
attributes, so 0 CPU arch attributes was allowed to be sent to
gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
But some implementation of CPU driver may return error for 0 CPU arch
attributes. That fails the case that caller just calls
SetMemorySpaceAttributes() with none CPU arch attributes (for example,
RUNTIME), and the purpose of the case is not to clear CPU arch attributes.
This patch filters the call to gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes()
if the requested attributes is 0. It also removes the #define
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES that is no longer used.
Cc: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Cc: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
NASM introduced FXSAVE / FXRSTOR support in commit 900fa5b26b8f ("NASM
0.98p3-hpa", 2002-04-30), which commit stands for the nasm-0.98p3-hpa
release.
NASM introduced FXSAVE64 / FXRSTOR64 support in commit 3a014348ca15
("insns: add FXSAVE64/FXRSTOR64, drop np prefix", 2010-07-07), which was
part of the "nasm-2.09" release.
Edk2 requires nasm-2.10 or later for use with the GCC toolchain family,
and nasm-2.12.01 or later for use with all other toolchain families.
Replace the binary encoding of the FXSAVE(64)/FXRSTOR(64) instructions
with mnemonics.
I verified that the "Ia32/SmiException.obj", "X64/SmiEntry.obj" and
"X64/SmiException.obj" files are rebuilt after this patch, without any
change in content.
This patch removes the last instructions encoded with DBs from
PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
(1) SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete32() runs in 32-bit mode, so wrap it in
a (BITS 32 ... BITS 64) bracket.
(2) SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete32() currently compiles to:
> 000002AE C6050000000001 mov byte [dword 0x0],0x1
> 000002B5 FF2500000000 jmp dword [dword 0x0]
where the first instruction is patched with the contents of
"mRebasedFlag" (so that (*mRebasedFlag) is set to 1), and the second
instruction is patched with the address of
"mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress" (so that we jump to
"mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress").
In its current form the first instruction could not be patched with
PatchInstructionX86(), given that the operand to patch is not encoded
in the trailing bytes of the instruction. Therefore, adopt an
EAX-based version, inspired by both the IA32 and X64 variants of
SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete():
> 000002AE 50 push eax
> 000002AF B800000000 mov eax,0x0
> 000002B4 C60001 mov byte [eax],0x1
> 000002B7 58 pop eax
> 000002B8 FF2500000000 jmp dword [dword 0x0]
Here both instructions can be patched with PatchInstructionX86(), and
the DBs can be replaced with native NASM syntax.
(3) Turn the "mRebasedFlagAddr32" and "mSmmRelocationOriginalAddressPtr32"
variables into markers that suit PatchInstructionX86().
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmmInitStack" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmmInit.nasm".
The size of the patched source operand is (sizeof (UINTN)).
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The IA32 version of "SmmInit.nasm" does not need "gSmmJmpAddr" at all (its
PiSmmCpuSmmInitFixupAddress() variant doesn't do anything either). We can
simply use the NASM syntax for the following Mixed-Size Jump:
> jmp PROTECT_MODE_CS : dword @32bit
The generated object code for the instruction is unchanged:
> 00000182 66EA5A0000000800 jmp dword 0x8:0x5a
(The NASM manual explains that putting the DWORD prefix after the colon
":" reflects the intent better, since it is the offset that is a DWORD.
Thus, that's what I used. However, both syntaxes are interchangeable,
hence the ndisasm output.)
The X64 version of "SmmInit.nasm" appears to require "gSmmJmpAddr";
however that's accidental, not inherent:
- Bring LONG_MODE_CODE_SEGMENT from
"UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h" to "SmmInit.nasm" as
LONG_MODE_CS, same as PROTECT_MODE_CODE_SEGMENT was brought to the IA32
version as PROTECT_MODE_CS earlier.
- Apply the NASM-native Mixed-Size Jump syntax again, but jump to the
fixed zero offset in LONG_MODE_CS. This will produce no relocation
record at all. Add a label after the instruction.
- Modify PiSmmCpuSmmInitFixupAddress() to patch the jump target backwards
from the label. Because we modify the DWORD offset with a DWORD access,
the segment selector is unharmed in the instruction, and we need not set
it from PiCpuSmmEntry().
According to "objdump --reloc", the X64 version undergoes only the
following relocations, after this patch:
> RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]:
> OFFSET TYPE VALUE
> 0000000000000095 R_X86_64_PC32 SmmInitHandler-0x0000000000000004
> 00000000000000e0 R_X86_64_PC32 mRebasedFlag-0x0000000000000004
> 00000000000000ea R_X86_64_PC32 mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress-0x0000000000000004
Therefore the patch does not regress
<https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=849> ("Enable XCODE5 tool
chain for UefiCpuPkg with nasm source code").
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Like "gSmmCr4" in the previous patch, "gSmmCr0" is not only used for
machine code patching, but also as a means to communicate the initial CR0
value from SmmRelocateBases() to InitSmmS3ResumeState(). In other words,
the last four bytes of the "mov eax, Cr0Value" instruction's binary
representation are utilized as normal data too.
In order to get rid of the DB for "mov eax, Cr0Value", we have to split
both roles, patching and data flow. Introduce the "mSmmCr0" global (SMRAM)
variable for the data flow purpose. Rename the "gSmmCr0" variable to
"gPatchSmmCr0" so that its association with PatchInstructionX86() is clear
from the declaration, change its type to X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and
patch it with PatchInstructionX86(), to the value now contained in
"mSmmCr0".
This lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of "mov eax, Cr0Value" in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Unlike "gSmmCr3" in the previous patch, "gSmmCr4" is not only used for
machine code patching, but also as a means to communicate the initial CR4
value from SmmRelocateBases() to InitSmmS3ResumeState(). In other words,
the last four bytes of the "mov eax, Cr4Value" instruction's binary
representation are utilized as normal data too.
In order to get rid of the DB for "mov eax, Cr4Value", we have to split
both roles, patching and data flow. Introduce the "mSmmCr4" global (SMRAM)
variable for the data flow purpose. Rename the "gSmmCr4" variable to
"gPatchSmmCr4" so that its association with PatchInstructionX86() is clear
from the declaration, change its type to X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and
patch it with PatchInstructionX86(), to the value now contained in
"mSmmCr4".
This lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of "mov eax, Cr4Value" in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmmCr3" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Yonghong Zhu
Yunhua Feng
Carsey, Jaben
Feng, YunhuaX
Star Zeng
Kinney, Michael D
Laszlo Ersek