REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
This issue originates from following patch which allows to enable
paging if PcdImageProtectionPolicy and PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
(in addition to PcdSetNxForStack) are set to enable related features.
5267926134
Due to above change, PcdImageProtectionPolicy will be set to 0 by
default in many platforms, which, in turn, cause following code in
MdeModulePkg\Core\Dxe\Misc\MemoryProtection.c fail the creation of
notify event of CpuArchProtocol.
1138: if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 ||
PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
1139: Status = CoreCreateEvent (
...
1142: MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
...
1145: );
Then following call flow won't be done and Guard pages will not be
set as not-present in SetAllGuardPages() eventually.
MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> HeapGuardCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> SetAllGuardPages()
The solution is removing the if(...) statement so that the notify
event will always be created and registered. This won't cause
unnecessary code execution because, in the notify event handler,
the related PCDs like
PcdImageProtectionPolicy and
PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
will be checked again before doing related jobs.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
At the end of of MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify there's cleanup
code to free resource. But at line 978, 994, 1005 the function returns
directly. This patch use "goto" to replace "return" to make sure the
resource is freed before exit.
1029: CoreCloseEvent (Event);
1030: return;
There's another memory leak after calling gBS->LocateHandleBuffer() in
the same function:
Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
ByProtocol,
&gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid,
NULL,
&NoHandles,
&HandleBuffer
);
HandleBuffer is allocated in above call but never freed. This patch
will also add code to free it.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Freed-memory guard is used to detect UAF (Use-After-Free) memory issue
which is illegal access to memory which has been freed. The principle
behind is similar to pool guard feature, that is we'll turn all pool
memory allocation to page allocation and mark them to be not-present
once they are freed.
This also implies that, once a page is allocated and freed, it cannot
be re-allocated. This will bring another issue, which is that there's
risk that memory space will be used out. To address it, the memory
service add logic to put part (at most 64 pages a time) of freed pages
back into page pool, so that the memory service can still have memory
to allocate, when all memory space have been allocated once. This is
called memory promotion. The promoted pages are always from the eldest
pages which haven been freed.
This feature brings another problem is that memory map descriptors will
be increased enormously (200+ -> 2000+). One of change in this patch
is to update MergeMemoryMap() in file PropertiesTable.c to allow merge
freed pages back into the memory map. Now the number can stay at around
510.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Now that Itanium support has been dropped, we can remove the various
occurrences of the ELILO on Itanium PE/COFF header workaround.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=816
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
We want to provide precise info in MemAttribTable
to both OS and SMM, and SMM only gets the info at EndOfDxe.
So we do not update RtCode entry in EndOfDxe.
The impact is that if 3rd part OPROM is runtime, it cannot be executed
at UEFI runtime phase.
Currently, we do not see compatibility issue, because the only runtime
OPROM we found before in UNDI, and UEFI OS will not use UNDI interface
in OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
So that the SMM can consume it to set page protection for
the UEFI runtime page with EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Due to the fact that HeapGuard needs CpuArchProtocol to update page
attributes, the feature is normally enabled after CpuArchProtocol is
installed. Since there're some drivers are loaded before CpuArchProtocl,
they cannot make use HeapGuard feature to detect potential issues.
This patch fixes above situation by updating the DXE core to skip the
NULL check against global gCpu in the IsMemoryTypeToGuard(), and adding
NULL check against gCpu in SetGuardPage() and UnsetGuardPage() to make
sure that they can be called but do nothing. This will allow HeapGuard to
record all guarded memory without setting the related Guard pages to not-
present.
Once the CpuArchProtocol is installed, a protocol notify will be called
to complete the work of setting Guard pages to not-present.
Please note that above changes will cause a #PF in GCD code during cleanup
of map entries, which is initiated by CpuDxe driver to update real mtrr
and paging attributes back to GCD. During that time, CpuDxe doesn't allow
GCD to update memory attributes and then any Guard page cannot be unset.
As a result, this will prevent Guarded memory from freeing during memory
map cleanup.
The solution is to avoid allocating guarded memory as memory map entries
in GCD code. It's done by setting global mOnGuarding to TRUE before memory
allocation and setting it back to FALSE afterwards in GCD function
CoreAllocateGcdMapEntry().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
If enabled, NX memory protection feature will mark some types of active
memory as NX (non-executable), which includes the first page of the stack.
This will overwrite the attributes of the first page of the stack if the
stack guard feature is also enabled.
The solution is to override the attributes setting to the first page of
the stack by adding back the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute when the stack
guard feature is enabled.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The commit rewrites the logic in function
InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy() for handling the first page
(page 0) when NULL pointer detection feature is enabled.
Instead of skip setting the page 0, the codes will now override the
attribute setting of page 0 by adding the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute.
The purpose is to make it easy for other special handling of pages
(e.g. the first page of the stack when stack guard feature is enabled).
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Considering following scenario (both NX memory protection and heap guard
are enabled):
1. Allocate 3 pages. The attributes of adjacent memory pages will be
|NOT-PRESENT| present | present | present |NOT-PRESENT|
2. Free the middle page. The attributes of adjacent memory pages should be
|NOT-PRESENT| present |NOT-PRESENT| present |NOT-PRESENT|
But the NX feature will overwrite the attributes of middle page. So it
looks still like below, which is wrong.
|NOT-PRESENT| present | PRESENT | present |NOT-PRESENT|
The solution is checking the first and/or last page of a memory block to be
marked as NX, and skipping them if they are Guard pages.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
If enabled, NX memory protection feature will mark all free memory as
NX (non-executable), including page 0. This will overwrite the attributes
of page 0 if NULL pointer detection feature is also enabled and then
compromise the functionality of it. The solution is skipping the NX
attributes setting to page 0 if NULL pointer detection feature is enabled.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Three issues addressed here:
a. Make NX memory protection and heap guard to be compatible
The solution is to check PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy in Heap Guard to
see if the free memory should be set to NX, and set the Guard page to NX
before it's freed back to memory pool. This can solve the issue which NX
setting would be overwritten by Heap Guard feature in certain
configuration.
b. Returned pool address was not 8-byte aligned sometimes
This happened only when BIT7 is not set in PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask. Since
8-byte alignment is UEFI spec required, letting allocated pool adjacent to
tail guard page cannot be guaranteed.
c. NULL address handling due to allocation failure
When allocation failure, normally a NULL will be returned. But Heap Guard
code will still try to adjust the starting address of it, which will cause
a non-NULL pointer returned.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The root cause is that mImagePropertiesPrivateData.CodeSegmentCountMax was
not updated with correct value due to the fact that SortImageRecord() called
before might change the content of current ImageRecord. This will in turn
cause incorrect memory map entries generated in SplitTable().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
In commit 7eb927db3e ("MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: implement memory protection
policy", 2017-02-24), we added two informative messages with the
InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy() function:
> InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy: applying strict permissions to
> active memory regions
and
> InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy: applying strict permissions to
> inactive memory regions
The messages don't report errors or warnings, thus downgrade their log
masks from DEBUG_ERROR to DEBUG_INFO.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520485
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Once the paging capabilities were filtered out, there might be some adjacent entries
sharing the same capabilities. It's recommended to merge those entries for the OS
compatibility purpose.
This patch makes use of existing method MergeMemoryMap() to do it. This is done by
simply turning this method from static to extern, and call it after filter code.
This patch is related to an issue described at
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753
This patch is also passed test of booting follow OSs:
Windows 10
Windows Server 2016
Fedora 26
Fedora 25
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
This feature makes use of paging mechanism to add a hidden (not present)
page just before and after the allocated memory block. If the code tries
to access memory outside of the allocated part, page fault exception will
be triggered.
This feature is controlled by three PCDs:
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdHeapGuardPoolType
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdHeapGuardPageType
BIT0 and BIT1 of PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask can be used to enable or disable
memory guard for page and pool respectively. PcdHeapGuardPoolType and/or
PcdHeapGuardPageType are used to enable or disable guard for specific type
of memory. For example, we can turn on guard only for EfiBootServicesData
and EfiRuntimeServicesData by setting the PCD with value 0x50.
Pool memory is not ususally integer multiple of one page, and is more likely
less than a page. There's no way to monitor the overflow at both top and
bottom of pool memory. BIT7 of PcdHeapGuardPropertyMask is used to control
how to position the head of pool memory so that it's easier to catch memory
overflow in memory growing direction or in decreasing direction.
Note1: Turning on heap guard, especially pool guard, will introduce too many
memory fragments. Windows 10 has a limitation in its boot loader, which
accepts at most 512 memory descriptors passed from BIOS. This will prevent
Windows 10 from booting if heap guard is enabled. The latest Linux
distribution with grub boot loader has no such issue. Normally it's not
recommended to enable this feature in production build of BIOS.
Note2: Don't enable this feature for NT32 emulation platform which doesn't
support paging.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Ayellet Wolman <ayellet.wolman@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
One of issue caused by enabling NULL pointer detection is that some PCI
device OptionROM, binary drivers and binary OS boot loaders may have NULL
pointer access bugs, which will prevent BIOS from booting and is almost
impossible to fix. BIT7 of PCD PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask is used
as a workaround to indicate BIOS to disable NULL pointer detection right
after event gEfiEndOfDxeEventGroupGuid, and then let boot continue.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Ayellet Wolman <ayellet.wolman@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ayellet Wolman <ayellet.wolman@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601
When installing configuration table and the original
gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer happen to be not big enough to
add a new table, the CoreInstallConfigurationTable() enter the branch
of line 113 in InstallConfigurationTable.c to free the old
gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer and allocate a new bigger one.
The problem happens at line 139 CoreFreePool(), which is to free the
old gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer. The CoreFreePool()'s
behavior is to free the buffer firstly, then call the
InstallMemoryAttributesTableOnMemoryAllocation (PoolType) to update
the EfiRuntimeServices type memory info, the
CoreInstallConfigurationTable() will be re-entered by CoreFreePool()
in its calling stack, then use-after-free read error will happen at
line 59 of InstallConfigurationTable.c and use-after-free write error
will happen at line 151 and 152 of InstallConfigurationTable.c.
The patch is to update System table to the new table pointer before
calling CoreFreePool() to free the old table.
The case above is in DxeCore, but not in PiSmmCore.
The change in PiSmmCore is to be consistent with DxeCore.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
For function SplitRecord() in file PropertiesTable.c, there is a
potential subtract underflow case for line:
return TotalNewRecordCount - 1;
However, such case will not happen since the logic in function
SplitTable() ensure that when calling SplitRecord(), the variable
'TotalNewRecordCount' will not be zero when performing the subtraction.
It will be handled in the previous if statement:
if (MaxSplitRecordCount == 0) {
CopyMem (NewRecord, OldRecord, DescriptorSize);
return 0;
}
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Currently, the PE/COFF image memory protection code uses the same code
paths for protecting and unprotecting an image. This is strange, since
unprotecting an image involves a single call into the CPU arch protocol
to clear the permission attributes of the entire range, and there is no
need to parse the PE/COFF headers again.
So let's store the ImageRecord entries in a linked list, so we can find
it again at unprotect time, and simply clear the permissions.
Note that this fixes a DEBUG hang on an ASSERT() that occurs when the
PE/COFF image fails to load, which causes UnprotectUefiImage() to be
invoked before the image is fully loaded.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
UEFI executables that consist of a single read+write+exec PE/COFF section
trigger this message, but such a binary layout isn't actually an error.
The image can be launched alright, only image protection cannot be applied
to it fully.
One example that elicits the message is (some) Linux kernels (with the EFI
stub of course).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Remove the local definitions for the default and runtime page allocation
granularity macros, and switch to the new MdePkg versions.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
This implements a DXE memory protection policy that ensures that regions
that don't require executable permissions are mapped with the non-exec
attribute set.
First of all, it iterates over all entries in the UEFI memory map, and
removes executable permissions according to the configured DXE memory
protection policy, as recorded in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy.
Secondly, it sets or clears the non-executable attribute when allocating
or freeing pages, both for page based or pool based allocations.
Note that this complements the image protection facility, which applies
strict permissions to BootServicesCode/RuntimeServicesCode regions when
the section alignment allows it. The memory protection configured by this
patch operates on non-code regions only.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Instead of assuming that a PE/COFF section of type EFI_IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE
can always be mapped read-only, classify a section as a code section only
if it has the executable attribute set and the writable attribute cleared.
This adheres more closely to the PE/COFF spec, and avoids issues with
Linux OS loaders that may consist of a single read/write/execute section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
If the UEFI image is page aligned, the image code section is set to read
only and the image data section is set to non-executable.
1) This policy is applied for all UEFI image including boot service driver,
runtime driver or application.
2) This policy is applied only if the UEFI image meets the page alignment
requirement.
3) This policy is applied only if the Source UEFI image matches the
PcdImageProtectionPolicy definition.
4) This policy is not applied to the non-PE image region.
The DxeCore calls CpuArchProtocol->SetMemoryAttributes() to protect
the image. If the CpuArch protocol is not installed yet, the DxeCore
enqueues the protection request. Once the CpuArch is installed, the
DxeCore dequeues the protection request and applies policy.
Once the image is unloaded, the protection is removed automatically.
The UEFI runtime image protection is teared down at ExitBootServices(),
the runtime image code relocation need write code segment at
SetVirtualAddressMap(). We cannot assume OS/Loader has taken over
page table at that time.
NOTE: It is per-requisite that code section and data section
should not be not merged. That is same criteria for SMM/runtime driver.
We are not able to detect during BIOS boot, because
we can only get LINK warning below:
"LINK : warning LNK4254: section '.data' (C0000040) merged into
'.text' (60000020) with different attributes"
But final attribute in PE code section is same.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
This patches rename CoreGetMemoryMapPropertiesTable to
CoreGetMemoryMapWithSeparatedImageSection.
The reason is that CoreGetMemoryMapPropertiesTable is called
by MemoryAttributesTable.c to get separated PE image section
information.
It is confusing to use *PropertiesTable, because it is NOT
related to PropertiesTable.c
We rename it to avoid confusing.
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Current MemoryAttributesTable will be installed on ReadyToBoot event
at TPL_NOTIFY level, it maybe incorrect when PcdHiiOsRuntimeSupport
= TRUE as HiiDatabaseDxe will have runtime memory allocation for HII
OS runtime support on and after ReadyToBoot. The issue was exposed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/10125.
To make sure the correctness of MemoryAttributesTable, this patch is
to enhance MemoryAttributesTable installation to install
MemoryAttributesTable on ReadyToBoot event at TPL_CALLBACK - 1 level
to make sure it is at the last of ReadyToBoot event, and also hook
runtime memory allocation after ReadyToBoot.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
If 'CoreGetMemoryMap' return success the 'MemoryMap' shouldn't be NULL.
Add code to make sure this.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Qiu Shumin <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
According to the spec, each entry in the Memory
Attributes table shall have the same type as
the region it was carved out of in the UEFI memory map.
The current attribute uses RTData for PE Data, but
it should be RTCode.
This patch fixed the issue. It is validated with or
without PropertiesTable.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
MemoryAttributesTable generation need information in
PropertiesTable.
In memory attributes table generation path,
PropertiesTable need record original memory map and do
not merge the new memory map entry cross original
memory map boundary.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Add MemoryAttributesTable generation in DxeCore.
We leverage the information collected by original
PropertiesTable, and publish runtime code/data to
another standalone table. So that this is a
compatible solution to report more PE Code/Data
information.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
In DxeCore, use warning message for Runtime driver that doesn't satisfy
section alignment requirement. This check is required when PropertiesTable
is installed. So, add error message if PropertiesTable can't be installed
successfully.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19312 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The splitting of memory regions into code and data regions violates
architecture specific alignment rules by using a fixed alignment
of 4 KB. Replace it with EFI_ACPI_RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT,
which is defined appropriately on each architecture.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Jaben Carsey" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17812 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This removes the functions RevertRuntimeMemoryMap () and
DumpMemoryMap () which are not referenced anywhere in the code.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17808 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The correct logic should be:
- The SectionAlignment is got from Magic number.
- The Magic number is got from PE header and machine type.
The original code mix them.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17603 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Michael D Kinney
Jian J Wang
Ard Biesheuvel
shenglei
Jiewen Yao
Liming Gao
Hao Wu
Laszlo Ersek
Shi, Steven
Dandan Bi
Fu Siyuan
Star Zeng
Qiu Shumin