A faulty PCI device has the Option ROM image size set to 0. UEFI reads
two headers PCI_EXPANSION_ROM_HEADER and PCI_DATA_STRUCTURE to get the
Option ROM information. Because the image size is 0, the Option ROM
header address never changes. As a result, UEFI keeps reading the same
two headers definitely. This patch is intended to fix it.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdeModulePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989
Long times spent on shadowing oprom from graphics card to system memory.
We are currently using 8 bit read cycles. This needs to be wider,
at least 32bit reads to reduce the time for oprom shadow.
Signed-off-by: Sumana Venur <sumana.venur@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Delete the explicit machine type check for option ROM images, and instead,
rely on the LoadImage() boot service to decide whether an option ROM can
be dispatched or not. This permits platforms to ship with emulators to
execute option ROMs that are not native to the processor architecture.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1376
Today's implementation reuses the 32bit MMIO resource requested by
all PCI devices MMIO BARs when shadowing the option ROM.
Take a simple example, a system has only one PCI device. It requires
8MB 32bit MMIO and contains a 4MB option ROM. Today's implementation
only requests 8MB (max of 4M and 8M) 32bit MMIO from
PciHostBridgeResourceAllocation protocol. Let's assume the MMIO range
[3GB, 3GB+8MB) is allocated. The 3GB base address is firstly
programmed to the option ROM BAR for option ROM shadow. Then the
option ROM decoding is turned off and 3GB base address is programmed
to the 32bit MMIO BAR.
It doesn't cause issues when the device doesn't request too much
MMIO.
But when the device contains a 64bit MMIO BAR which requests 4GB MMIO
and a 4MB option ROM. Let's assume [3GB, 3GB+8MB) 32bit MMIO range is
allocated for the option ROM. When the option ROM is being shadowed,
64bit MMIO BAR is programmed to value 0, which means [0, 4GB) MMIO is
given to the 64bit BAR.
The range overlaps with the option ROM range which may cause the
device malfunction (e.g.: option ROM cannot be read out) when the
device has two separate decoders: one for MMIO BAR, the other for
option ROM.
The patch requests dedicated MEM32 resource for Option ROMs and
moves the Option ROM shadow logic after all MMIO BARs are programmed.
The MMIO BAR setting to 0 when shadowing Option ROM is also skipped
because the MMIO BAR already contains the correct value.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
It's a regression of below commit:
SHA-1: 8be37a5cee
* MdeModulePkg/SecurityStubDxe: Defer 3rd party image before EndOfDxe
When PciBus driver fails to load the Option ROM, it doesn't produce
BusOverride protocol. It was a correct behavior before the above
commit. But due to the above commit, BusOverride protocol never is
produced by PciBus driver.
The patch fixes this issue using the following solution:
1. PciBus records the image device path when LoadImage fails.
2. Override.GetDriver() tries to look for the image handle using
the stored image device path.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch doesn't impact real functionality.
It only renames EFI_PCI_ROM_IMAGE_MAPPING to PCI_ROM_IMAGE,
and changes prototype of PciRomAddImageMapping so that
no explicit type cast is needed when calling this function.
It also removes unused field RomBase from PCI_IO_DEVICE structure.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
* Check if the machine type of the image is supported by the current UEFI system.
* Ignore the image if it is an EFI application as required by the UEFI spec.
Signed-off-by: rsun3
Reviewed-by: li-elvin
git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@12465 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
a. Update PciBusDxe module, and move it from IntelFrameworkModulePkg to MdeModulePkg
b. Move IncompatiblePciDeviceSupportDxe module from IntelFrameworkModulePkg to MdeModulePkg
c. Update the related consumes in inf/dsc/fdf
git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@9347 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Nhi Pham
Michael Kubacki
Sumana Venur
Ard Biesheuvel
Michael D Kinney
Ray Ni
Ruiyu Ni
Liming Gao
Hao Wu
niruiyu
rsun3
hhtian
davidhuang