mirror of https://github.com/acidanthera/audk.git
1fceaddb12
In OVMF we currently get the upper (>=4GB) memory size with the
GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() function.
The GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() function is used in two places:
(1) It is the starting point of the calculations in GetFirstNonAddress().
GetFirstNonAddress() in turn
- determines the placement of the 64-bit PCI MMIO aperture,
- provides input for the GCD memory space map's sizing (see
AddressWidthInitialization(), and the CPU HOB in
MiscInitialization()),
- influences the permanent PEI RAM cap (the DXE core's page tables,
built in permanent PEI RAM, grow as the RAM to map grows).
(2) In QemuInitializeRam(), GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb() determines the
single memory descriptor HOB that we produce for the upper memory.
Respectively, there are two problems with GetSystemMemorySizeAbove4gb():
(1) It reads a 24-bit count of 64KB RAM chunks from the CMOS, and
therefore cannot return a larger value than one terabyte.
(2) It cannot express discontiguous high RAM.
Starting with version 1.7.0, QEMU has provided the fw_cfg file called
"etc/e820". Refer to the following QEMU commits:
- 0624c7f916b4 ("e820: pass high memory too.", 2013-10-10),
- 7d67110f2d9a ("pc: add etc/e820 fw_cfg file", 2013-10-18)
- 7db16f2480db ("pc: register e820 entries for ram", 2013-10-10)
Ever since these commits in v1.7.0 -- with the last QEMU release being
v2.9.0, and v2.10.0 under development --, the only two RAM entries added
to this E820 map correspond to the below-4GB RAM range, and the above-4GB
RAM range. And, the above-4GB range exactly matches the CMOS registers in
question; see the use of "pcms->above_4g_mem_size":
pc_q35_init() | pc_init1()
pc_memory_init()
e820_add_entry(0x100000000ULL, pcms->above_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM);
pc_cmos_init()
val = pcms->above_4g_mem_size / 65536;
rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5b, val);
rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5c, val >> 8);
rtc_set_memory(s, 0x5d, val >> 16);
Therefore, remedy the above OVMF limitations as follows:
(1) Start off GetFirstNonAddress() by scanning the E820 map for the
highest exclusive >=4GB RAM address. Fall back to the CMOS if the E820
map is unavailable. Base all further calculations (such as 64-bit PCI
MMIO aperture placement, GCD sizing etc) on this value.
At the moment, the only difference this change makes is that we can
have more than 1TB above 4GB -- given that the sole "high RAM" entry
in the E820 map matches the CMOS exactly, modulo the most significant
bits (see above).
However, Igor plans to add discontiguous (cold-plugged) high RAM to
the fw_cfg E820 RAM map later on, and then this scanning will adapt
automatically.
(2) In QemuInitializeRam(), describe the high RAM regions from the E820
map one by one with memory HOBs. Fall back to the CMOS only if the
E820 map is missing.
Again, right now this change only makes a difference if there is at
least 1TB high RAM. Later on it will adapt to discontiguous high RAM
(regardless of its size) automatically.
-*-
Implementation details: introduce the ScanOrAdd64BitE820Ram() function,
which reads the E820 entries from fw_cfg, and finds the highest exclusive
>=4GB RAM address, or produces memory resource descriptor HOBs for RAM
entries that start at or above 4GB. The RAM map is not read in a single
go, because its size can vary, and in PlatformPei we should stay away from
dynamic memory allocation, for the following reasons:
- "Pool" allocations are limited to ~64KB, are served from HOBs, and
cannot be released ever.
- "Page" allocations are seriously limited before PlatformPei installs the
permanent PEI RAM. Furthermore, page allocations can only be released in
DXE, with dedicated code (so the address would have to be passed on with
a HOB or PCD).
- Raw memory allocation HOBs would require the same freeing in DXE.
Therefore we process each E820 entry as soon as it is read from fw_cfg.
-*-
Considering the impact of high RAM on the DXE core:
A few years ago, installing high RAM as *tested* would cause the DXE core
to inhabit such ranges rather than carving out its home from the permanent
PEI RAM. Fortunately, this was fixed in the following edk2 commit:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| AmdSev.c | ||
| Cmos.c | ||
| Cmos.h | ||
| FeatureControl.c | ||
| Fv.c | ||
| MemDetect.c | ||
| Platform.c | ||
| Platform.h | ||
| PlatformPei.inf | ||
| Xen.c | ||
| Xen.h | ||