If we get back an error that wasn't an APIError, it was causing the
thread to hang. This catch all, while I appreciate feels risky to
have a catch all, is better than not catching and silently failing,
with a never ending thread.
If something worse than an APIError has gone wrong, we want to stop
the incredible journey of what we're doing.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
In order to validate a service name that has been specified as an
integer we need to run that as a pre-process validation step
*before* we pass the config to be validated against the schema.
It is not possible to validate it *in* the schema, it causes a
type error. Even though a number is a valid service name, it
must be a cast as a string within the yaml to avoid type error.
Taken this opportunity to move the code design in a direction
towards:
1. pre-process
2. validate
3. construct
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
We use $ref in the schema to allow us to specify multiple type, eg
command, it can be a string or a list of strings.
It required some extra parsing to retrieve a helpful type to display
in our error message rather than 'string or string'. Which while
correct, is not helpful. We value helpful.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
When a schema type is set as unique, we should display the validation
error to indicate that non-unique values have been provided for a key.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
The validation message was confusing by displaying only 1 level of
property of the service, even if the error was another level down.
Eg. if the 'files' property of 'extends' was the incorrect format,
it was displaying 'an invalid value for 'extends'', rather than
correctly retrieving 'files'.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Unfortunately the way that jsonschema is calling %r on its property
and then encoding the complete message means I've had to do this
manual way of removing the literal string prefix, u'.
eg:
key = 'extends'
message = "Invalid value for %r" % key
error.message = message.encode("utf-8")"
results in:
"Invalid value for u'extends'"
Performing a replace to strip out the extra "u'", does not change the
encoding of the string, it is at this point the character u followed
by a '.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
While it was intended as a positive to be stricter in validation
it would in fact break backwards compatibility, which we do not
want to be doing.
Consider re-visiting this later and include a deprecation warning if
we want to be stricter.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
