Currently, for each `Disconnect()` call, we spawn a coroutine, but every
one of them is just usesless, except the first one. However, since all
`Disconnect()` usages share the same asio strand and cannot interfere
with each other, spawning another coroutine within `Disconnect()` isn't
even necessary. When a coroutine calls `Disconnect()` now, it will
immediately initiate an async shutdown of the socket, potentially causing
the coroutine to yield and allowing the others to resume. Therefore, the
`m_ShuttingDown` flag is still required by the coroutines to be checked
regularly.
For check_procs, both the Monitoring Plugins' implementation[0] and the
Nagios Plugin[1] are supporting the "-X" or "--exclude-process" flag to
exclude one or many processes by name. However, this flag is missing
here in the Icinga Template Library.
The Nagios Plugin implementation also comes with "-j" and "-g" for
FreeBSD jails and Linux cgroups, respectively. But, to keep it
compatible, I would ignore these for the moment.
Closes#10226.
[0]: https://www.monitoring-plugins.org/doc/man/check_procs.html
[1]: https://nagios-plugins.org/doc/man/check_procs.html
by not calling `std::atomic<T>::atomic(void)`.
After the latter the instance "does not contain a T object, and its only valid uses are destruction and initialization by std::atomic_init" which we don't call. So the only safe option is `std::atomic<T>::atomic(T)`.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/atomic/atomic
When the `Desconnect()` method is called, clients are not disconnected
immediately. Instead, a new coroutine is spawned using the same strand
as the other coroutines. This coroutine calls `async_shutdown` on the
TCP socket, which might be blocking. However, in order not to block
indefintely, the `Timeout` class cancels all operations on the socket
after `10` seconds. Though, the timeout does not trigger the handler
immediately; it creates spawns another coroutine using the same strand
as in the `JsonRpcConnection` class. This can cause unexpected delays if
e.g. `HandleIncomingMessages` gets resumed before the coroutine from the
timeout class. Apart from that, the coroutine for writing messages uses
the same condition, making the two symmetrical.
Something is definitely going wrong if a client tries to reconnect to
this endpoint while it still has an active connection to that client. So
we shouldn't hide this, but at least log it at info level. Apart from
that, I've added some additional information about the currently active
client, such as when the last message was sent and received.
This is a good alternative to `icinga2 feature enable debuglog`:
* Object creation/deletion via API happens immediately and requires no restart
* Hence, the debug log is enabled exactly as long as desired
Co-authored-by: alvar <8402811+oxzi@users.noreply.github.com>
The Redis ACL system was introduced with Redis 6.0. It introduced users
with precisely granular permissions. This change allows Icinga 2 to use
the Icinga DB feature against a Redis with an ACL user.
This was reflected in the documentation, next to the already
implemented, but undocumented Redis database.
Closes#9536.
Each configuration field of an IcingaDB Object was marked with
no_user_modify as modifications via the API would not result in an
actual change. While the Object would be updated, the internal Redis
connection would not be restarted, resulting in an unexpected behavior.
The missing db_index was added to the documentation.
The previous validation in set_verify_callback() could be bypassed, tricking
Icinga 2 into treating invalid certificates as valid. To fix this, the
validation checks were moved into the IsVerifyOK() function.
This is tracked as CVE-2024-49369, more details will be published at a later time.
This fixes an issue where recovery notifications get lost if they happen
outside of a notification time period.
Not all calls to `Checkable::NotificationReasonApplies()` need
`GetStateBeforeSuppression()` to be checked. In fact, for one caller,
`FireSuppressedNotifications()` in
`lib/notification/notificationcomponent.cpp`, the state before suppression may
not even be initialized properly, so that the default value of OK is used which
can lead to incorrect return values. Note the difference between suppressions
happening on the level of the `Checkable` object level and the `Notification`
object level. Only the first sets the state before suppression in the
`Checkable` object, but so far, also the latter used that value incorrectly.
This commit moves the check of `GetStateBeforeSuppression()` from
`Checkable::NotificationReasonApplies()` to the one place where it's actually
relevant: `Checkable::FireSuppressedNotifications()`. This made the existing
call to `NotificationReasonApplies()` unneccessary as it would always return
true: the `type` argument is computed based on the current check result, so
there's no need to check it against the current check result.
Yonas Habteab
Alexander A. Klimov
Alvar Penning
Julian Brost
Julian Brost