See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825.
Various edits to existing tests so that they make more sense with the
removal of relativeTo.
New tests specifically testing that calendar units cannot be added or
subtracted directly.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825. This is a mass removal of tests that use
this functionality, in a separate commit for ease of review. Further
adjustments will be made in the following commit.
This covers an edge case that we hit, where 24 hours would not balance up
to one day in a 25-hour day if only largestUnit was specified, but would
erroneously balance up if rounding was also performed by specifying
smallestUnit.
In ZonedDateTime.p.since/until, it's possible for AddDateTime to hit the
limit if the rounding increment is very high, even if the resulting
rounded duration isn't outside of the limit. Add a test covering this
case.
This should produce all the same results (except for a change to weeks
balancing in round(), which is now more consistent with since()/until())
but leads to different observable user code calls.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2742
It was previously not tested what options value a custom calendar's
dateFromFields() method would be called with, when called from the
toPlainDate() method of PlainYearMonth/PlainMonthDay.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2803
These tests were supposed to test an invalid ISO string being used as the
`calendar` property in a property bag. Instead they were testing being
used as an invalid ISO string directly where a PlainDate input was needed.
(That is also already covered elsewhere.)
Due to overlooked copy-paste errors we were creating the wrong type of
instance in these tests, and therefore testing the wrong method.
(Add blank line for consistency with the other instances of these tests.)
After rounding relative to a ZonedDateTime, we have to potentially adjust
for DST. With a time zone providing nonsensical values, the duration may
go out of range.
See: tc39/proposal-temporal#2801
This test isn't testing what the assertion message previously said it was
testing. The integer is allowed to be unsafe, but in this case its
float64-representation is out of range.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2785
With test cases kindly provided by Anba, this adds test coverage for the
abrupt completion in the last step of DifferenceTemporalPlainDateTime,
where the resulting Duration components have mixed signs.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2783
normalized-time-duration-to-days-range-errors.js tests for several error
cases in the AO NormalizedTimeDurationToDays. Adding assertion messages
helps to know which one you are debugging.
As per IETF, annotation keys may only consist of lowercase letters,
dashes, and digits, and an optional leading underscore. Uppercase letters
are non-syntactical. Add tests covering this.
These test cases ensure that DST disambiguation does not take place on
intermediate values that are not the start or the end of the calculation.
Note that NormalizedTimeDurationToDays is no longer called inside
Temporal.Duration.prototype.add/subtract, so a few tests can be deleted.
Other tests need to be adjusted because NormalizedTimeDurationToDays is
no longer called inside Temporal.ZonedDateTime.prototype.since/until via
DifferenceZonedDateTime, although it is still called as part of rounding.
In addition, new tests for the now-fixed edge case are added, and for the
day corrections that can happen to intermediates.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2760
This adds tests specifically for every kind of case that changes due to
the tweak to the date difference algorithm: differences from a longer
month to a shorter month, when the months are adjacent, in the same year
but not adjacent, and in different years.
Also adds tests for a case that does *not* change, but would trip on an
incorrectly implemented algorithm: when the intermediate months value
falls at the end of February.
There was incidental coverage of the change to the date difference
algorithm in other tests. Those are adjusted, as well.
Normative change: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2759
Consensus in February 2024
Adapts the tests that checked arbitrarily long loops, to now check that an
exception is thrown if the loop would happen.
Adds tests that exercise the newly added checks on return values of
getPossibleInstantsFor and getOffsetNanosecondsFor that limit UTC offset
shifts to 24 hours or less.
Also updates some step numbers in related tests.
The existing tests didn't cover some edge cases where implementations
have to compute the exact result of `numerator / denominator`, where at
least one of `numerator` and `denominator` can't be exactly represented
by an IEEE-754 double precision floating point value.
"precision-exact-mathematical-values-5.js" gets added in #3961, so the
new tests from this commit start at "precision-exact-mathematical-values-6.js".
NormalizedTimeDurationToDays can no longer loop indefinitely, because at
a certain point we will hit the upper bound of MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, so rename
the test to reflect that it can loop an arbitrary but limited number of
times.
Add a test for the RangeError condition in NormalizedTimeDurationToDays
when the time zone calculates a day length that is not a safe integer
number of nanoseconds.
While editing these tests, rename them to match the current name of the AO
and make sure the step numbers are up to date. (Normally I wouldn't care
so much about that, but these tests can be pretty confusing so it's good
to be able to refer to the spec text.)
Adapts or removes tests that relied on creating durations that are now out
of range. Adds new tests for maximum in-range and minimum out-of-range
durations.
A few results change because the algorithm previously used for rounding
didn't always add duration units to dates in RFC 5545 order, and we also
introduce a special case for rounding with largestUnit years or months and
smallestUnit weeks.
Philip Chimento
André Bargull
Adam Shaw
Timothy Leverett
Aditi
Nicolò Ribaudo