Previously in a few cases (calendar units in Duration) the value for the
roundingIncrement option had no upper limit, other than having to be
finite. These tests cover a normative change limiting it to 1e9.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2480
The with() methods, as well as PlainYearMonth's since() and until(), were
adjusted to read the receiver's fields before the fields of any objects
provided as arguments. This change is observable, so affects several tests
that test the observed order of operations.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2478
I used a script to "unroll" some of the calls to
TemporalHelpers.checkToTemporalCalendarFastPath(), and rewrite it slightly
not to use a specific Calendar instance. This is in preparation for a
future refactor, but also allows testing the PlainTime path which was not
previously covered.
(I didn't unroll all the calls and remove the helper yet, because the
remaining calls have custom assertions that I haven't gotten the script to
work with yet. For the same reason, I didn't yet convert these to use the
test generation facility. These will follow in a future PR.)
For each entry point where a string calendar name is accepted, we should
have a test that ensures the calendar name is case-insensitive. These
tests existed but several were incomplete as they didn't take nested
properties into account, and several entry points were missing this test.
Fix a minor copy-paste issue with double semicolons.
I overlooked the fact that passing an imported module object to $DONE will
correctly fail the test.
I still think this way of writing the test is unclear, though.
This proposes a `harness/asyncHelpers.js` file with two helpers in it,
`asyncTest()` and `assert.throwsAsync()`. See the RFC for further
motivation and details.
Note the draft RFC process in https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/3525.
My idea for this pull request is that besides being an RFC in its own
right, we use it as a test case for the process. That is, we follow the
draft RFC process and hopefully either validate it, or surface changes
that need to be made, after which we can land the RFC process in our
documentation.
Following up on #3751 and #3762, this commit makes a few tests
work on both CLDR 42 and CLDR 41. Previously these tests were
tied to a specific CLDR 42 format.
Adapt to the following changes in CLDR 42 in Node 19:
- Some spaces in formats replaced by other whitespace unicode characters
- German format changes, which may be bugs (see
https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-16243)
This commit makes affected tests more resilient to Intl.DTF output
changes between Node versions.
A good idea for a future PR would be to change these tests to rely less
on CLDR formats while still testing that Temporal and Intl are behaving
as expected.
Here are some of the standard tests for property metadata of the
Array.fromAsync property and for the built-in function object. These don't
require doing anything asynchronously, so can be considered separately
from the Async Helpers RFC.
* Reject exceptional input to `isConstructor`
Prior to this commit, the `isConstructor` harness function would return
`false` when invoked with a value that lacked a [[Call]] internal
method. While it's true that such values are not constructors, there are
no tests which benefit from using `isConstructor` to make such an
assertion.
Extend `isConstructor` to throw an error when invoked with a
non-function object. Update a test which was misleadingly invoking the
function with the value `undefined`.
* fixup! Reject exceptional input to `isConstructor`
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2437, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes the observable order of property accesses to be alphabetical where
possible.
1. String.prototype.toWellFormed's name is "toWellFormed".
2. "asserts" does not exist in the test harness, and "assert.throws"
expects the error type first.
This reconciles changes made in two normative PRs to the Temporal proposal
which each had their own separate PRs for tests. The yearOfWeek tests were
written before the changes to the ISO 8601 grammar which disallowed the
YYYY-MM-DD+UU format. This brings the yearOfWeek tests in line with the
tests for the other calendar methods.
This test template shared the same "path" as its sibling,
cls-decl-decorators-valid-syntax.template. That meant that these two
templates would race to generate the same test files with different
contents.
This prefixes the generated tests for class element decorators (as opposed
to class decorators) with "class-element-".
