Reland https://crrev.com/c/4913993
This CL adds three tests from test methods tests to staging
directory with correct format.
Bug: v8:13556
Change-Id: I93817eb84e077436071dbae98bc800dd58851f91
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4983674
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Liviu Rau <liviurau@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#90645}
These tests were incorrect, in checking for a RangeError when only one of
the era/eraYear fields were given. From CalendarResolveFields:
"The operation throws a *TypeError* exception if the properties of
_fields_ are internally inconsistent within the calendar or insufficient
to identify a unique instance of _type_ in the calendar."
Built-in non-ISO calendars require either monthCode/day, or month/day plus
some form of year specification.
This adds test coverage for each of the categories listed in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2664, of which some must
currently reside in the test/intl402/ folders.
We'll do this for now, then separately work on migrating all of the tests
that require a non-ISO8601 calendar but aren't dependent on it being any
particular calendar.
The circleci/ images are deprecated and replaced by cimg/. Hopefully this
will have a glibc that is new enough for XS's versioned symbols to link
against.
Rename 'node_latest' to 'node_image' since the image is the LTS, not the
latest. The name would otherwise be confusing.
Closes: #3891
In the AO DisambiguatePossibleInstants, a PlainDateTime instance is passed
to user code. This instance should have the built-in ISO 8601 calendar.
Here are some tests that ensure it does.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2671.
In PlainYearMonth arithmetic, we need to find the end of the month when
adding a negative duration or subtracting a positive one. This end of the
month can be out of range.
Test case based on one provided by Anba. See issue:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2700
Two issues:
1. There was a typo, the first `gen` should have been `genFn`.
2. And the last `toString` result should be `'[object Generator]'`,
because `Object.getPrototypeOf(gen) == genFn.prototype`. And the
`@@toStringTag` property of `genFn.prototype` is inherited from
`Generator.prototype[@@toStringTag]`.
That also means the "iterator-helpers" flag isn't needed for this test.
For the statement level test, the inner class name is not initialized
at the time the decorators evaluate, resulting in a ReferenceError
that the declaration can not be accessed prior to initialization.
Similar, non-decorator code, like:
class C {
static dec() {}
static {
this.x = C.dec();
class C {}
}
}
also results in a ReferenceError.
For the expression level test, the var C is undefined at the time the
decorators are evaluated, resulting in TypeError while trying to access
a member of undefined.
Similar, non-decorator code, like:
var C = class {
static f() {};
static {
this.x = C.f();
}
}
also results in a TypeError.
This removes several loopholes where it was possible to return particular
values from user calls that would cause infinite loops, or calculate
zero-length days.
This allows removing several tests, as calendar.dateAdd() is no longer
called in several places, and it's no longer possible to create a
situation where BigInt arithmetic is observable in NanosecondsToDays.