Adds new tests to order-of-operations.js in Duration.round and
Duration.total, to exercise the code path where previous to this normative
change, relativeTo would have been converted to PlainDate 3x and 2x,
respectively.
This shortcut path now exists in all round(), since(), and until()
operations.
In Instant, PlainDate, PlainDateTime, and PlainTime, the change isn't
observable, so no tests could be added. This adds test coverage for
- Duration.p.round()
- PlainYearMonth.p.since()
- PlainYearMonth.p.until()
- ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- ZonedDateTime.p.since()
- ZonedDateTime.p.until()
As well as a few cases where we are testing that certain calendar methods
get called during a round operation, but previously were doing so with
options that now become a no-op and no longer call those calendar methods.
In those cases, round to 2 ns, rather than 1 ns.
These two can be combined into one test, since they are very similar. This
will allow testing the sample DST time zone as well, which is not yet
tested.
This toString() call would observably get the `id` property of the
plainDateTime's calendar object. Not good for the tests that I am writing
that verify observable calls!
The behavior of `/\p{RGI_Emoji}/v` and other properties of strings depends on the Unicode & Emoji version being used in the JavaScript engine. This patch adds tests verifying new additions to `RGI_Emoji` for each release of the Unicode Emoji standard are correctly matched.
Adds tests that verify that Instant strings cannot include offset time
zone annotations with sub-minute units.
Also removes a few staging test cases that, due to a polyfill bug, were
incorrectly passing.
There was one remaining Temporal test that was parsing an ISO string
with a sub-minute offset into a Temporal.TimeZone. A polyfill bug was
allowing this test case to pass, even though after
tc39/proposal-temporal#2607 it should have failed.
This commit removes the bad test case.
This commit verifies that ISO strings with sub-minute offsets cannot
be parsed into time zone identifiers. This was a change introduced in
the recently-merged tc39/proposal-temporal#2607, but tests for this case
were missing from #3862 (the tests for that PR).
I noticed in codecov results on an unrelated PR that this case wasn't
being tested, so fixing that mistake now.
