In edit or hexedit, the mouse cursor doesn't move when moving
the mouse.
The root cause is 5563281fa2
* ShellPkg/[hex]edit: use SimpleTextInEx to read console
wrongly uses WaitForEvent() to listen keyboard input.
It blocks the code execution when there is no keyboard input.
While the same function also polls the mouse move status,
the mouse movement cannot be reflected to the screen when
there is no keyboard input.
The patch fixes the issue by use CheckEvent() instead of
WaitForEvent().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Neither the EFI_PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_IO_PROTOCOL nor the EFI_CPU_IO2_PROTOCOL
impose any restrictions when it comes to the range of valid I/O
addresses. Even so, the 'mm' command in -IO mode refuses to perform
accesses to addresses >= 0xffff.
It is not up to 'mm' to impose this restriction, so remove it.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
After commit 20ddbc133f
* MdeModulePkg/ConSplitter: ReadKeyStrokeEx always return key state
When one physical console supports to report the shift key state,
the key data returned from ConSplitter driver at least carries
the shift key valid bit.
The patch fixes the edit/hexedit to accept Unicode (1) when
the no shift key is pressed or reported.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682
Edit and HexEdit commands assume that SimpleTxtIn translates
Ctrl+<Alpha-Key> key combinations into Unicode control characters
(0x1-0x1A).
Such translation does not seem to be required by the UEFI spec.
Shell should not rely on implementation specific behavior.
It should instead use SimpleTextInEx to read Ctrl+<Alpha-Key> key
combinations.
The patch changes edit and hexedit to only consumes SimpleTextInEx
so that the implementation specific behavior dependency is removed.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reported-by: Felix <felixp@mail.ru>
Cc: Felix <felixp@mail.ru>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
HDiskImageSetDiskNameOffsetSize() and HFileImageSetFileName()
may be called using the current disk name or file name.
When this happens, today's implementation firstly frees the memory
and then accesses the just-freed memory.
The patch fixes this issue by doing nothing when the disk or file
name is the current one.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
"Compress.h" declares the Compress() function as EFIAPI, but the
definition in "Compress.c" lacks EFIAPI.
GCC toolchains without LTO do not catch this error because "Compress.c"
does not include "Compress.h"; i.e. the declaration used by callers such
as "EfiCompress.c" is not actually matched against the function definition
at build time.
With LTO enabled, the mismatch is found -- however, as a warning only, due
to commit f8d0b96629 ("BaseTools GCC5: disable warnings-as-errors for
now", 2016-08-03).
Include the header in the C file (which turns the issue into a hard build
error on all GCC toolchains), plus sync the declaration from the header
file to the C file. Finally, remove EFIAPI from both declaration and
definition -- this was the original intent of commit c4e74e9b81
("ShellPkg/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib: Remove unnecessary EFIAPI",
2016-10-09), but it missed the header file.
(Gary meant to address that omission in Oct 2017:
[edk2] [PATCH] ShellPkg/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib: Remove EFIAPI from
Compress()
http://mid.mail-archive.com/20171026065329.32311-1-glin@suse.com
and Ray reviewed the patch, but then the patch was never committed.)
So do the sync and drop EFIAPI now.
This happens to fix the EFICOMPRESS shell command, when built with GCC for
X64.
Cc: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Fixes: c4e74e9b81
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
EfiCpuIoWidthUint8 should be used in HMemImageRead and HMemImageSave.
Because CpuIo protocol is now used for memory access.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The original code uses PciRootBridgeIo for memory access.
It worked before MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe driver was checked in.
But MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe adds checks to ensure the MMIO
access request is in the scope of the current RootBridgeIo instance.
It causes "hexeditor -m 0 2" reports error because memory address 0
surely is not in the scope of any RootBridgeIo instance.
In fact only accessing the MMIO space occupied by the RootBridgeIo
can work.
The patch changes hexeditor to use CpuIo for memory access.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The original code as below intend to set the character
before last column to CHAR_NULL.
Line[(LastCol % (ARRAY_SIZE (Line) - 1)) - 1] = CHAR_NULL;
But when LastCol % (ARRAY_SIZE (Line) - 1)) equals to 0,
Line[-1] is modified.
We should change to code as below:
Line[(LastCol - 1) % (ARRAY_SIZE (Line) - 1)] = CHAR_NULL;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
EditorClearLine() assumes the console max column is less than 200.
When the max column is bigger than 200, the code incorrectly
modifies the content out side of Line buffer.
It may cause system hang or reset.
The patch changes the function to print several times when
the max column is bigger than 200.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/DmpStore.c:525:66: error:
> passing argument 2 of 'gEfiShellProtocol->GetGuidName' from incompatible
> pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>
> Status = gEfiShellProtocol->GetGuidName(&FoundVarGuid, &GuidName);
> ^
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/DmpStore.c:525:66: note:
> expected 'const CHAR16 ** {aka const short unsigned int **}' but
> argument is of type 'CHAR16 ** {aka short unsigned int **}'
Pointer-to-(pointer-to-CHAR16) and pointer-to-(pointer-to-const-CHAR16)
are incompatible types; GCC and CLANG are right to complain.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Reported-by: Jenkins Build Host <jenkins@kraxel.org>
Reported-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716
Fixes: 09e8678380
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Change "dmpstore" to show name of known variable vendor GUID.
The name is got from ShellProtocol.GetGuidName().
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Huajing Li <huajing.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Current code will allocate pool to hold the null char for name buffer
when PrevName==NULL, but the NameSize is still 0.
For this case, GetNextVariableName will return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER
to follow UEFI 2.7 spec.
UEFI 2.7 spec:
The VariableNameSize must not be smaller the size of the variable
name string passed to GetNextVariableName() on input in the
VariableName buffer.
EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER
Null-terminator is not found in the first VariableNameSize bytes of
the input VariableName buffer.
This patch is to make NameSize to be consistent with name buffer.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The patch dumps memory map information for all memory types.
But to follow the SFO format of "memmap" defined in Shell 2.2 spec,
the patch doesn't dump the memory map information for OEM/OS
memory types. But it does include the OEM/OS memory in the total
size in SFO format.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The patch changes Buffer to Descriptors, changes
(UINT8 *Walker) to (EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *Walker).
The change makes lots of type conversion unnecessary.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The SMBIOS Type 0 BIOS segment field is currently displayed in decimal.
Since this field is likely to have a value like 0xE800 or 0xF000, using
hexadecimal seems like a better choice.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@ni.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
It is to align to the original behavior before "-ec" option was
added.
The patch also refines the code to make it more readable.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Dailey <Jim.Dailey@dell.com>
Shell 2.2 spec defines =0x/=0X, =H/=h, =S, =L and =P for
hex number, hex array, ascii string, unicode string and
device path data.
The patch adds such support.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
The patch doesn't impact the functionality.
The rename also fixes the inconsistency between function
header comments and function parameters.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Type 0: Update "EDD Enhanced Disk Driver)..." to
"EDD (Enhanced Disk Driver)..." for
STR_SMBIOSVIEW_PRINTINFO_EDD_ENHANCED_DRIVER
Type 3: Use L" Laptop" instead of L" LapTop" in
SystemEnclosureTypeTable to match SMBIOS spec.
Type 10: The BIT7 of Device Type is representing the
status of device whether it is enabled or disabled.
But current code is not considering the BIT7 and will
print "Undefined Value" for enabled device. Type 41
has same definition of Device Type, the code is
correct and will be applied to Type 10 by this patch.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Current PrintBitsInfo() will always print an additional trailing
" | " for the bit flags, for example,
Base Board Feature Flags: Hosting board | Replaceable |
Th patch is to eliminate trailing " | " in PrintBitsInfo(), then
the output will be like below
Base Board Feature Flags: Hosting board | Replaceable
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
The implementation was already there but through a private flag
"-_e". The patch removes "-_e" support and add "-ec" support.
Removing old "-_e" support makes the pci command more clean.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354
The patch removes the local PCI definitions and uses the definitions
defined in MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard folder.
There is no functionality impact.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jarben.carsey@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
The decoding of TPM Device (Type 43) has been added at
e9f0be021b.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345
When I am adding SMBIOS spec 3.1.0 support, I found the decoding
of SMBIOS spec 3.0.0 for some definitions is missing.
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344
SlotType AGP8X was added in SMBIOS spec 2.3.4, but the decoding
of it is missing. I found it when I am adding SMBIOS spec 3.1.0
support.
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Added decoding of the new SMBIOS Type 43 record.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Augustine Linson P <linson.augustine@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The smbiosview command was not displaying SMBIOS Type 3 Height, NumberofPowerCords, or SKU Number.
Added handling to display these values.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chris Phillips <chrisp@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch adds the "-sfo" support to "dmpstore" command.
When -l or -d is specified, -sfo is not supported.
When the variable specified by name and GUID cannot be found,
an error message is displayed; Otherwise, the SFO is displayed.
E.g.: "dmpstore -guid GuidThatDoesntExist -sfo" produces output
as:
ShellCommand,"dmpstore"
VariableInfo,"","GuidThatDoesntExist","","",""
"dmpstore NameThatDoesntExist -guid GuidThatDoesntExist -sfo"
produces output as:
ShellCommand,"dmpstore"
dmpstore: No matching variables found. Guid GuidThatDoesntExist, Name
NameThatDoesntExist
The difference between the above 2 cases is that former one only
specifies the GUID, but the latter one specifies both name and GUID.
Since not specifying GUID means to use GlobalVariableGuid,
"dmpstore NameThatDoesntExist -sfo" produces the similar output as
latter one.
I personally prefer to always produce SFO output for both cases.
But the above behavior is the discussion result between HPE engineers.
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapan Shah <tapandshah@hpe.com>