DEPEX from PEI storage stack.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777
BootInRecoveryMode Ppi dependency should be removed from PEI storage stack
drivers. Besides recovery, more features are using the storage stack.
Platform can apply Ppi dependency in Recovery FV which contains full
storage driver stack. Platform storage stack modules, such as host
controller init PEI module, should also remove this dependency.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
Currently Framework compatibility is not needed and
PcdFrameworkCompatibilitySupport will be removed from edk2.
So remove the usage of this PCD firstly.
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134
Originally, the block size of created Ram disks is hard-coded to 512
bytes. However, if the total size of the Ram disk is not a multiple of 512
bytes, there will be potential memory access issues when dealing with the
last block of the Ram disk.
This commit will adjust the block size of the Ram disks to ensure that the
total size is a multiple of the block size.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1134
The commit adds checks for detecting GPT and MBR partitions.
These checks will ensure that the device block size is big enough to hold
an MBR (512 bytes).
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1279
For function ResolveSymlink(), the below codes:
if (CompareMem ((VOID *)&PreviousFile, (VOID *)Parent,
sizeof (UDF_FILE_INFO)) != 0) {
CleanupFileInformation (&PreviousFile);
}
CopyMem ((VOID *)&PreviousFile, (VOID *)File, sizeof (UDF_FILE_INFO));
If the contents in 'PreviousFile' and 'File' are the same, call to
"CleanupFileInformation (&PreviousFile);" will free the buffers in 'File'
as well. This will lead to potential memory double free/use after free
issues.
This commit will add additional check to address the above issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1279
The content within 'File' is the output data for ResolveSymlink(). This
commit will add checks to ensure the content in 'File' is valid.
Otherwise, possible null pointer dereference issue will occur during the
subsequent usage of the data returned by ResolveSymlink().
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1279
According to the ECMA-167 standard (3rd Edition - June 1997), Section
14.16.1.1, valid values are 1 to 5. All other values will be treated as a
corrupted volume.
This commit will add such check within function ResolveSymlink().
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255
For function ReadFile():
If the line
Status = GetAedAdsData (
...
);
is reached multiple times during the 'for' loop, freeing the data pointed
by variable 'Data' may potentially lead to variable 'Ad' referencing the
already-freed data.
After calling function GetAllocationDescriptor(), 'Data' and 'Ad' may
point to the same memory (with some possible offset). Hence, this commit
will move the FreePool() call backwards to ensure the data will no longer
be used.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1254
This commit will add an additional check within function GetPdFromLongAd()
when getting a Partition Descriptor from given a Long Allocation
Descriptor.
According to UDF 2.60 Spec, Section 2.2.13:
> The partition reference numbers used are determined by the order of the
> Partition Maps in the LVD.
(Also the picture comes before the above contents)
And a more detailed explanation of the partition reference numbers is at
https://sites.google.com/site/udfintro/ (seems not a formal documentation
though), Section 5.3.6.
Based on the above findings, the 'PartitionReferenceNumber' field in a
Long Allocation Descriptor is used as an index to access the Partition
Maps data within a Logical Volume Descriptor.
Hence, the new check focuses on the validity of this
'PartitionReferenceNumber' field in a Long Allocation Descriptor. Since
the current implementation of UdfDxe driver supports only one partition on
a Logical Volume, so the value of 'PartitionReferenceNumber' should be 0.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175
This commit will update the UdfGetInfo() function with the support of
EFI_FILE_SYSTEM_VOLUME_LABEL data information request.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253
Within function SetFileInfo():
This commit will fix a typo where 'Minute' should be used instead of
'Second'.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252
Calling the 'SetPosition' service of the EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL with 'Position'
equals to 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF for a file is to set the current position to
the end of the file. But the current implementation of function
UdfSetPosition() is to set it to the last byte (not EOF).
This commit will resolve this issue.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
Within GetVolumeSize():
The boundary check will validate the 'NumberOfPartitions' field of a
Logical Volume Integrity Descriptor matches the data within the relating
Logical Volume Descriptor.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
Within ResolveSymlink():
The boundary check will validate the 'LengthofComponentIdentifier' field
of a Path Component matches the data within the relating (Extended) File
Entry.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
Within ReadFile():
Add checks to ensure that when getting the raw data or the Allocation
Descriptors' data from a FE/EFE, it will not consume data beyond the
size of a FE/EFE.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
The commit refines the boundary checks for file/path name string to
prevent possible buffer overrun.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828
Within FindAnchorVolumeDescriptorPointer():
Add a check for the underlying device block size to ensure it is greater
than the size of an Anchor Volume Descriptor Pointer.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Acked-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1249
We found potential dead codes within File.c during the code coverage test.
After manual review, we think the below ones are positive reports:
A. For function GetAllocationDescriptor():
Due to the all the calling places for this function, the input parameter
'RecordingFlags' can only with value 'LongAdsSequence' or
'ShortAdsSequence'. Moreover, this is also mentioned in the function
description comments for GetAllocationDescriptor().
So the below code will never be reached:
return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
This commit will add "ASSERT (FALSE);" before the above line to indicate
this and thus matching the function description comments.
B. For function GetAllocationDescriptorLsn():
Due to the all the calling places for this function, the input parameter
'RecordingFlags' can only with value 'LongAdsSequence' or
'ShortAdsSequence'. Moreover, this is also mentioned in the function
description comments for GetAllocationDescriptorLsn().
So the below code will never be reached:
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
This commit will add "ASSERT (FALSE);" before the above line to indicate
this and thus matching the function description comments.
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <paulo@paulo.ac>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1249
We found potential dead codes within File.c during the code coverage test.
After manual review, we think the below ones are positive reports:
A. In function UdfRead():
else if (IS_FID_DELETED_FILE (Parent->FileIdentifierDesc)) {
Status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
}
A File Identifier Descriptor will be get from the UDF media only by
function ReadDirectoryEntry(). And within this function, all the File
Identifier Descriptor with 'DELETED_FILE' characteristics will be skipped
and will not be returned. Hence, the above codes in function UdfRead()
will never be hit.
This commit will add "ASSERT (FALSE);" before the above line to indicate
this.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248
Within function UdfOpen():
This commit will use debug messages instead of using ASSERT when an error
occurs after calling GetFileSize().
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248
This commit will refine the ASSERTs in function GetLongAdLsn() and
GetAllocationDescriptorLsn() when the logical sector number cannot be
returned due to unrecognized media format.
Error handling logic will be used for those ASSERTs.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This commit adds ASSERTs to address false positive reports of NULL
pointer dereference issues raised from static analysis with regard to
function ReadDirectoryEntry().
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247
For functions DuplicateFid() and DuplicateFe(), this commit will use error
handling logic instead of ASSERTs for memory allocation failure.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Replace the OpenFileByDevicePath() function with EfiOpenFileByDevicePath()
from UefiLib, correcting the following issues:
- imprecise comments on OpenFileByDevicePath(),
- code duplication between this module and other modules,
- local variable name "EfiSimpleFileSystemProtocol" starting with "Efi"
prefix,
- bogus "FileHandle = NULL" assignments,
- passing a potentially unaligned "FILEPATH_DEVICE_PATH.PathName" field to
a protocol member function (forbidden by the UEFI spec),
- leaking "Handle1" when the device path type/subtype check fails in the
loop,
- stale SHELL_FILE_HANDLE reference in a comment.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Add the partition type GUID for every partition to the installed handle,
this is required per the UEFI specification.
"The firmware must add the PartitionTypeGuid to the handle of every
active GPT partition using EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.InstallProtocolInterface()."
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen.qdt@qualcommdatacenter.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The commit places the check for MediaId at the beginning of Block IO
services:
RamDiskBlkIoReadBlocks and
RamDiskBlkIoWriteBlocks
This aligns with the Block IO protocol implementations for other
devices.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The call in ProbeMediaStatusEx() to the ReadDisk() function of the
EFI_DISK_IO_PROTOCOL interface implemented in DiskIoDxe/DiskIo.c
crashed in DiskIo2ReadWriteDisk() because of the NULL value of
the destination buffer pointer.
Pass the address of a buffer in the stack instead of a NULL
pointer.
The similar fix was applied to ProbeMediaStatus in commit
df473cc1fc
* MdeModulePkg/PartitionDxe: Fix media probe
Somehow ProbeMediaStatusEx() wasn't changed together.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
This commit removes unnecessary parentheses in 'if' statements to
resolve the build failures by the XCODE5 tool chain.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In function FindFileEntry():
Instead of using the function parameter 'FileEntry', use a local
variable to store the buffer allocated for disk read operation.
For the below calling stack:
UdfOpenVolume() -> FindRootDirectory() -> FindFileEntry()
In FindFileEntry(), the call to 'DiskIo->ReadDisk()' is possible (e.g.
media change for a CD/DVD ROM device) to trigger a re-install of the
BlockIO(2) protocol which will further lead to a call of the BindingStop()
& BingdingStart() of the UdfDxe driver.
Meanwhile, for the above listed calling stack, the '**FileEntry'
parameter passed into FindFileEntry() is '&PrivFsData->Root'. 'PrivFsData'
is a driver-managed private data, it will be freed in BindingStop() and
re-allocate in BingdingStart().
In such case, if '*FileEntry' is used to store the allocated buffer, the
information will be lost if 'DiskIo->ReadDisk()' triggers a re-install of
the BlockIO(2) protocol. The subsequent call of the FreePool API:
FreePool (*FileEntry);
will cause issues.
This commit uses a local variable to store the allocated buffer.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
In order to create all of the children (El Torito standard and UDF) for
a CD/DVD media in an entry of the PartitionDriverBindingStart(), this
commit merges the discovery of the El Torito feature
(PartitionInstallElToritoChildHandles) into function
PartitionInstallUdfChildHandles.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725
Historically many drives or medias do not correctly return their value
for block N - which is also referred as last addressable/recorded block.
When they do so, there is still a problem when relying on last recorded
block number returned by SCSI commands READ CAPACITY and READ TRACK
INFORMATION - that is, between block 0 and block N there may be
unwritten blocks which are located outside any track.
That said, the Partition driver was unable to find AVDP at block N on
certain medias that do not either return or report their last recorded
block number correctly.
Apparently there is no official or correct way to find the correct block
number, however tools like the Philips UDF Conformance Tool (udf_test)
apply a correction by searching for an AVDP or VAT in blocks N through
N-456 -- this can be observed by looking at the log reported by udf_test
on those CD/DVD medias. So, if the AVDP or VAT is found, then it sets
the last recorded block number to where AVDP or VAT was located.
With the below setence in UDF 2.60, 6.13.2.2 Background Physical
Formatting:
"... the second AVDP must be recorded after the Background physical
Formatting has been finished..."
Implies that the last recorded block is the one where second AVDP was
recorded.
This patch implements a similar way to correct the last recorded block
number by searching for last AVDP in blocks N-1 through N-512 on those
certain medias, as well as ensure a minimum number of 2 AVDPs found as
specified by ECMA 167 and UDF 2.60 specifications.
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reported-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Within function GetAllocationDescriptorLsn():
The call to GetPdFromLongAd() may return NULL and it will be later
dereferenced in GetShortAdLsn().
This commit adds ASSERT to resolve the potential NULL pointer
dereference.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Do not reserve entire block device size for an UDF file system -
instead, reserve the appropriate space (UDF logical volume space) for
it.
Additionally, only create a logical partition for UDF logical volumes
that are currently supported by EDK2 UDF file system implementation. For
instance, an UDF volume with a single LVD and a single Physical (Type 1)
Partition will be supported.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Tested-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Build-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Build-tested-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Build-tested-by: Paulo Alcantara <paulo@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Similar to the naming style for variables, it's better for the name of
members in a enum type to avoid using only upper-case letters.
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The local GUID variable 'UdfDevPathGuid', it has been initialized during
its declaration.
For better coding style, this commit uses a global variable instead.
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
In ResolveSymlink(), replace the following variable:
CHAR16 *C;
with:
CHAR16 *Char;
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Case 1 - Within DuplicateFid() & DuplicateFe():
The call to AllocateCopyPool() may return NULL.
Add ASSERTs as checks.
Case 2 - Within UdfRead():
Add ASSERT to ensure 'NewFileEntryData' returned from FindFileEntry()
will not be NULL pointer.
Case 3 - Within GetAllocationDescriptorLsn():
The return value of 'GetPdFromLongAd (Volume, ParentIcb)' may be NULL,
and it will be passed into function GetShortAdLsn() which will
dereference it.
Add ASSERT in GetShortAdLsn() as check.
Case 4 - Within ReadFile():
Add ASSERT to ensure 'Data' returned from GetAedAdsData() will not be NULL
pointer.
Case 5 - Within InternalFindFile():
If both 'Parent->FileIdentifierDesc' and 'Icb' are NULL, then possible
NULL pointer dereference will happen in ReadDirectoryEntry().
Add additional check to resolve.
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
For root directory, the FID (File Identifier Descriptor) pointer is
accessible through PRIVATE_UDF_FILE_DATA.Root, whereas non-root
directory and regular files, their FIDs are accessible through
PRIVATE_UDF_FILE_DATA.File.
In UdfSetPosition(), the FID was retrieved through
PRIVATE_UDF_FILE_DATA.File, hence when calling it with a root directory,
PRIVATE_UDF_FILE_DATA.File.FileIdentifierDescriptor would be NULL and
then dereferenced.
This patch fixes the NULL pointer dereference by calling _FILE() to
transparently return the correct UDF_FILE_INFO * which points to a valid
FID descriptor of a specific file.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reported-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
VS2010/VS2012 build failure with below info:
warning C4701:
potentially uninitialized local variable 'DataOffset' used
potentially uninitialized local variable 'FilePosition' used
potentially uninitialized local variable 'FinishedSeeking' used
potentially uninitialized local variable 'Data' used
warning C4703:
potentially uninitialized local pointer variable 'Data' used
In fact, DataOffset, FilePosition and FinishedSeeking are initialized
and then used if (ReadFileInfo->Flags == READ_FILE_SEEK_AND_READ).
DoFreeAed will be set to TRUE when Data is allocated and returned from
GetAedAdsData(), and Data will be freed if (DoFreeAed) when exiting.
Use same method at 5afa5b8159 to fix
the build failure.
There is related discussion at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-September/014641.html
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
When building the driver for DEBUG/RELEASE, GCC48/GCC49 warn about
ReadFile() possibly using "BytesLeft" without initializing it first.
This is not the case. The reads of "BytesLeft" are only reachable if
(ReadFileInfo->Flags == READ_FILE_SEEK_AND_READ). But, in that case, we
also set "BytesLeft" to "ReadFileInfo->FileDataSize", near the top of the
function.
Assign "BytesLeft" zero at the top, and add a comment that conforms to the
pending Coding Style Spec feature request at
<https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607>.
This issue was reported by Ard's and Gerd's CI systems independently.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
The ECMA-167 standard (3rd Edition, June 1997) reserves values 4 through 7
in the ICB.Flags[2:0] bit-field for future standardization; see "14.6 ICB
Tag" / "14.6.8 Flags (RBP 18)".
https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-167.htm
The
switch (RecordingFlags)
statement in the ReadFile() function handles all the standard values,
using the constants of the UDF_FE_RECORDING_FLAGS enum type. However, the
reserved values are not caught with a "default" case label, which both
breaks the edk2 Coding Style Spec, and leaves the Status variable
un-initialized, before we return Status under the Done label.
Set Status to EFI_UNSUPPORTED if we encounter a reserved value.
This issue was reported by Ard's and Gerd's CI systems independently
(through build failures with GCC48/GCC49, DEBUG/RELEASE targets).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
This patch gets rid of a negative comparison of an UINT64 type (Offset)
as it'll never evaluate to true.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reported-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
In the expression
(RemainderByMediaBlockSize != 0 ||
Media->BlockSize > UDF_LOGICAL_SECTOR_SIZE)
the second expression is only evaluated if the first expression is false.
If the first expression is false, i.e.,
RemainderByMediaBlockSize == 0
then UDF_LOGICAL_SECTOR_SIZE is a whole multiple of "Media->BlockSize",
which implies
UDF_LOGICAL_SECTOR_SIZE >= Media->BlockSize.
Therefore whenever
Media->BlockSize > UDF_LOGICAL_SECTOR_SIZE
is evaluated, it is false.
The expression
((expression) || FALSE)
is equivalent to
(expression).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>