As we never use the values, just keep the keys in a set.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
switch list to set:
1)we dont care about order
2)we only check for membership.
then remove ".keys()" from dict looping:
allow generators opportunity to optimize
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
The Pcd used in [Components] section, the PCD value is displayed
incorrect in the build report because the PCD default value was not
override.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Pcds in Conditional Directives and Pcds not used are Platform Level
info, it should not display in Module PCD Section.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
It is caused by 0c9f2cb10b
and false positive.
Initialize CpuArchAttributes to suppress incorrect
compiler/analyzer warnings.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
by changing from list to set(), we can skip all the preprocessing
to prevent duplication and we dont need to convert to a set() later
on for each use
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
make it easy to import and use by others
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
The RegEx matches begining and end of the string, dont then check length.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
since we need order and a default entry, use collections dicts to
auto generate.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
we initialize this dict and then check it's contents, but never add items.
we can remove it without any effect.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
This patch fixes an issue with VlvTbltDevicePkg introduced
by commit 5b91bf82c6.
The history is as below.
To support heap guard feature, 14dde9e903
added support for SetMemorySpaceAttributes() to handle page attributes,
but after that, a combination of CPU arch attributes and other attributes
was not allowed anymore, for example, UC + RUNTIME. It is a regression.
Then 5b91bf82c6 was to fix the regression,
and we thought 0 CPU arch attributes may be used to clear CPU arch
attributes, so 0 CPU arch attributes was allowed to be sent to
gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
But some implementation of CPU driver may return error for 0 CPU arch
attributes. That fails the case that caller just calls
SetMemorySpaceAttributes() with none CPU arch attributes (for example,
RUNTIME), and the purpose of the case is not to clear CPU arch attributes.
This patch filters the call to gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes()
if the requested attributes is 0. It also removes the #define
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES that is no longer used.
Cc: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Cc: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
NASM introduced FXSAVE / FXRSTOR support in commit 900fa5b26b8f ("NASM
0.98p3-hpa", 2002-04-30), which commit stands for the nasm-0.98p3-hpa
release.
NASM introduced FXSAVE64 / FXRSTOR64 support in commit 3a014348ca15
("insns: add FXSAVE64/FXRSTOR64, drop np prefix", 2010-07-07), which was
part of the "nasm-2.09" release.
Edk2 requires nasm-2.10 or later for use with the GCC toolchain family,
and nasm-2.12.01 or later for use with all other toolchain families.
Replace the binary encoding of the FXSAVE(64)/FXRSTOR(64) instructions
with mnemonics.
I verified that the "Ia32/SmiException.obj", "X64/SmiEntry.obj" and
"X64/SmiException.obj" files are rebuilt after this patch, without any
change in content.
This patch removes the last instructions encoded with DBs from
PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
(1) SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete32() runs in 32-bit mode, so wrap it in
a (BITS 32 ... BITS 64) bracket.
(2) SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete32() currently compiles to:
> 000002AE C6050000000001 mov byte [dword 0x0],0x1
> 000002B5 FF2500000000 jmp dword [dword 0x0]
where the first instruction is patched with the contents of
"mRebasedFlag" (so that (*mRebasedFlag) is set to 1), and the second
instruction is patched with the address of
"mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress" (so that we jump to
"mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress").
In its current form the first instruction could not be patched with
PatchInstructionX86(), given that the operand to patch is not encoded
in the trailing bytes of the instruction. Therefore, adopt an
EAX-based version, inspired by both the IA32 and X64 variants of
SmmRelocationSemaphoreComplete():
> 000002AE 50 push eax
> 000002AF B800000000 mov eax,0x0
> 000002B4 C60001 mov byte [eax],0x1
> 000002B7 58 pop eax
> 000002B8 FF2500000000 jmp dword [dword 0x0]
Here both instructions can be patched with PatchInstructionX86(), and
the DBs can be replaced with native NASM syntax.
(3) Turn the "mRebasedFlagAddr32" and "mSmmRelocationOriginalAddressPtr32"
variables into markers that suit PatchInstructionX86().
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmmInitStack" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmmInit.nasm".
The size of the patched source operand is (sizeof (UINTN)).
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The IA32 version of "SmmInit.nasm" does not need "gSmmJmpAddr" at all (its
PiSmmCpuSmmInitFixupAddress() variant doesn't do anything either). We can
simply use the NASM syntax for the following Mixed-Size Jump:
> jmp PROTECT_MODE_CS : dword @32bit
The generated object code for the instruction is unchanged:
> 00000182 66EA5A0000000800 jmp dword 0x8:0x5a
(The NASM manual explains that putting the DWORD prefix after the colon
":" reflects the intent better, since it is the offset that is a DWORD.
Thus, that's what I used. However, both syntaxes are interchangeable,
hence the ndisasm output.)
The X64 version of "SmmInit.nasm" appears to require "gSmmJmpAddr";
however that's accidental, not inherent:
- Bring LONG_MODE_CODE_SEGMENT from
"UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h" to "SmmInit.nasm" as
LONG_MODE_CS, same as PROTECT_MODE_CODE_SEGMENT was brought to the IA32
version as PROTECT_MODE_CS earlier.
- Apply the NASM-native Mixed-Size Jump syntax again, but jump to the
fixed zero offset in LONG_MODE_CS. This will produce no relocation
record at all. Add a label after the instruction.
- Modify PiSmmCpuSmmInitFixupAddress() to patch the jump target backwards
from the label. Because we modify the DWORD offset with a DWORD access,
the segment selector is unharmed in the instruction, and we need not set
it from PiCpuSmmEntry().
According to "objdump --reloc", the X64 version undergoes only the
following relocations, after this patch:
> RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]:
> OFFSET TYPE VALUE
> 0000000000000095 R_X86_64_PC32 SmmInitHandler-0x0000000000000004
> 00000000000000e0 R_X86_64_PC32 mRebasedFlag-0x0000000000000004
> 00000000000000ea R_X86_64_PC32 mSmmRelocationOriginalAddress-0x0000000000000004
Therefore the patch does not regress
<https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=849> ("Enable XCODE5 tool
chain for UefiCpuPkg with nasm source code").
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Like "gSmmCr4" in the previous patch, "gSmmCr0" is not only used for
machine code patching, but also as a means to communicate the initial CR0
value from SmmRelocateBases() to InitSmmS3ResumeState(). In other words,
the last four bytes of the "mov eax, Cr0Value" instruction's binary
representation are utilized as normal data too.
In order to get rid of the DB for "mov eax, Cr0Value", we have to split
both roles, patching and data flow. Introduce the "mSmmCr0" global (SMRAM)
variable for the data flow purpose. Rename the "gSmmCr0" variable to
"gPatchSmmCr0" so that its association with PatchInstructionX86() is clear
from the declaration, change its type to X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and
patch it with PatchInstructionX86(), to the value now contained in
"mSmmCr0".
This lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of "mov eax, Cr0Value" in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Unlike "gSmmCr3" in the previous patch, "gSmmCr4" is not only used for
machine code patching, but also as a means to communicate the initial CR4
value from SmmRelocateBases() to InitSmmS3ResumeState(). In other words,
the last four bytes of the "mov eax, Cr4Value" instruction's binary
representation are utilized as normal data too.
In order to get rid of the DB for "mov eax, Cr4Value", we have to split
both roles, patching and data flow. Introduce the "mSmmCr4" global (SMRAM)
variable for the data flow purpose. Rename the "gSmmCr4" variable to
"gPatchSmmCr4" so that its association with PatchInstructionX86() is clear
from the declaration, change its type to X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and
patch it with PatchInstructionX86(), to the value now contained in
"mSmmCr4".
This lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of "mov eax, Cr4Value" in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmmCr3" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmmInit.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
(This patch is the 64-bit variant of commit e75ee97224,
"UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: remove unneeded DBs from IA32 SmmStartup()",
2018-01-31.)
The SmmStartup() function executes in SMM, which is very similar to real
mode. Add "BITS 16" before it and "BITS 64" after it (just before the
@LongMode label).
Remove the manual 0x66 operand-size override prefixes, for selecting
32-bit operands -- the sizes of our operands trigger NASM to insert the
prefixes automatically in almost every spot. The one place where we have
to add it back manually is the LGDT instruction. In the LGDT instruction
we also replace the binary 0x2E prefix with the normal NASM syntax for CS
segment override.
The stores to the Control Registers were always 32-bit wide; the source
code only used RAX as source operand because it generated the expected
object code (with NASM compiling the source as if in BITS 64). With BITS
16 added, we can use the actual register width in the source operands
(EAX).
This patch causes NASM to generate byte-identical object code (determined
by disassembling both the pre-patch and post-patch versions, and comparing
the listings), except:
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
> 000001D2 6689D3 mov ebx,edx
> 000001D5 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0
> 000001DB 0F22D8 mov cr3,eax
> -000001DE 662E670F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa]
> +000001DE 2E66670F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa]
> 000001E5 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0
> 000001EB 80CC02 or ah,0x2
> 000001EE 0F22E0 mov cr4,eax
The only difference is the prefix list order, it changes from:
- 0x66, 0x2E, 0x67
to
- 0x2E, 0x66, 0x67
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
"mXdSupported" is a global BOOLEAN variable, initialized to TRUE. The
CheckFeatureSupported() function is executed on all processors (not
concurrently though), called from SmmInitHandler(). If XD support is found
to be missing on any CPU, then "mXdSupported" is set to FALSE, and further
processors omit the check. Afterwards, "mXdSupported" is read by several
assembly and C code locations.
The tricky part is *where* "mXdSupported" is allocated (defined):
- Before commit 717fb60443 ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add paging
protection.", 2016-11-17), it used to be a normal global variable,
defined (allocated) in "SmmProfile.c".
- With said commit, we moved the definition (allocation) of "mXdSupported"
into "SmiEntry.nasm". The variable was defined over the last byte of a
"mov al, 1" instruction, so that setting it to FALSE in
CheckFeatureSupported() would patch the instruction to "mov al, 0". The
subsequent conditional jump would change behavior, plus all further read
references to "mXdSupported" (in C and assembly code) would read back
the source (imm8) operand of the patched MOV instruction as data.
This trick required that the MOV instruction be encoded with DB.
In order to get rid of the DB, we have to split both roles: we need a
label for the code patching, and "mXdSupported" has to be defined
(allocated) independently of the code patching. Of course, their values
must always remain in sync.
(1) Reinstate the "mXdSupported" definition and initialization in
"SmmProfile.c" from before commit 717fb60443. Change the assembly
language definition ("global") to a declaration ("extern").
(2) Define the "gPatchXdSupported" label (type X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL)
in "SmiEntry.nasm", and add the C-language declaration to
"SmmProfileInternal.h". Replace the DB with the MOV mnemonic (keeping
the imm8 source operand with value 1).
(3) In CheckFeatureSupported(), whenever "mXdSupported" is set to FALSE,
patch the assembly code in sync, with PatchInstructionX86().
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmiCr3" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmiEntry.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmiStack" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration. Also change its type
to X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL.
Unlike "gSmbase" in the previous patch, "gSmiStack"'s patched value is
also de-referenced by C code (in other words, it is read back after
patching): the InstallSmiHandler() function stores "CpuIndex" to the given
CPU's SMI stack through "gSmiStack". Introduce the local variable
"CpuSmiStack" in InstallSmiHandler() for calculating the stack location
separately, then use this variable for both patching into the assembly
code, and for storing "CpuIndex" through it.
It's assumed that "volatile" stood in the declaration of "gSmiStack"
because we used to read "gSmiStack" back for de-referencing; with that use
gone, we can remove "volatile" too. (Note that the *target* of the pointer
was never volatile-qualified.)
Finally, replace the binary (DB) encoding of "mov esp, imm32" in
"SmiEntry.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Rename the variable to "gPatchSmbase" so that its association with
PatchInstructionX86() is clear from the declaration, change its type to
X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL, and patch it with PatchInstructionX86(). This
lets us remove the binary (DB) encoding of some instructions in
"SmiEntry.nasm".
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
"#endif" preprocessing directives near the top of "BaseLib.h" helpfully
repeat the preprocessing conditions from their matching "#if", "#ifdef",
and "#ifndef" directives. This practice has been less followed recently;
supplement the missing comments.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
1. Fix some "support" to "supported".
2. Fix some "set" to "clear" in ClearMemoryAttributes interface.
3. Remove redundant comments for GetMemoryAttributes interface.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
this same function in 2 classes is never called.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Carsey, Jaben
Yonghong Zhu
Feng, YunhuaX
Star Zeng
Kinney, Michael D
Laszlo Ersek