REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498
Commit fd30b00707 updated the logic in function MicrocodeDetect() that
will directly use the CPUID and PlatformID information from the 'CpuData'
field in the CPU_MP_DATA structure, instead of collecting these
information for each processor via AsmCpuid() and AsmReadMsr64() calls
respectively.
At that moment, this approach worked fine for APs. Since:
a) When the APs are waken up for the 1st time (1st MpInitLibInitialize()
entry at PEI phase), the function InitializeApData() will be called for
each AP and the CPUID and PlatformID information will be collected.
b) During the 2nd entry of MpInitLibInitialize() at DXE phase, when the
APs are waken up again, the function InitializeApData() will not be
called, which means the CPUID and PlatformID information will not be
collected. However, the below logics in MicrocodeDetect() function:
CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();
IsBspCallIn = (ProcessorNumber == (UINTN)CpuMpData->BspNumber) ? TRUE : FALSE;
if (CurrentRevision != 0 && !IsBspCallIn) {
//
// Skip loading microcode if it has been loaded successfully
//
return;
}
will ensure that the microcode detection and application will be
skipped due to the fact that such process has already been done in the
PEI phase.
But after commit 396e791059, which removes the above skip loading logic,
the CPUID and PlatformID information on APs will be used upon the 2nd
entry of the MpInitLibInitialize(). But since the CPUID and PlatformID
information has not been collected, it will bring issue to the microcode
detection process.
This commit will update the logic in MicrocodeDetect() back to always
collecting the CPUID and PlatformID information explicitly.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The existing MpInitLib will shadow the microcode update patches from
flash to memory and this is done by searching microcode region specified
by PCD PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize.
This brings a limition to platform FW that all the microcode patches must
be placed in one continuous flash space.
This patch shadows microcode update according to FIT microcode entries if
it's present, otherwise it will fallback to original logic (by PCD).
A new featured PCD gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuShadowMicrocodeByFit
is added for enabling/disabling this support.
TEST: Tested on FIT enabled platform.
BZ: https://tianocore.acgmultimedia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
This patch updates the microcode loader to always perform a microcode
detect and load on both BSP and AP processor. This is to fix a potential
microcode revision mismatch issue in below situation:
1. Assume there are two microcode co-exists in flash: one production
version and one debug version microcode.
2. FIT loads production microcode to BSP and all AP.
3. UefiCpuPkg loader loads debug microcode to BSP, and skip the loading
on AP.
As a result, different microcode patches are loaded to BSP and AP, and
trigger microcode mismatch error during OS boot.
BZ link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2431
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
This patch removes the unnecessary alignment check on microcode patch
TotalSize introduced by commit d786a172. The TotalSize has already been
checked with 1K alignment and MAX_ADDRESS in previous code as below:
if ( (UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize) ||
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd ||
(DataSize & 0x3) != 0 ||
(TotalSize & (SIZE_1KB - 1)) != 0 ||
TotalSize < DataSize
) {
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Previous commits have introduced below fields in structure CPU_AP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT8 PlatformId;
UINT64 MicrocodeEntryAddr;
which store the information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. Detected microcode patch entry address (including the microcode patch
header)
for each processor within system.
Therefore, the below fields in structure CPU_MP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT32 ProcessorFlags;
UINT64 MicrocodeDataAddress;
UINT32 MicrocodeRevision;
which store the BSP's information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. The address and revision of detected microcode patch
are redundant and can be removed.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2430
This commit will update the MpInitLib to:
A. Collect the base address and size information after microcode patches
being loaded into memory;
B. Collect the detected microcode patch for each processor within system;
C. Based on the collected information, produce the EDKII microcode patch
HOB.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429
This commit will attempt to reduce the copy size when loading the
microcode patches data from flash into memory.
Such optimization is done by a pre-process of the microcode patch headers
(on flash). A microcode patch will be loaded into memory only when the
below 3 criteria are met:
A. With a microcode patch header (which means the data is not padding data
between microcode patches);
B. The 'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlags' fields in the header match
at least one processor within system;
C. If the Extended Signature Table exists in a microcode patch, the
'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlag' fields in the table entries
match at least one processor within system.
Criterion B and C will require all the processors to be woken up once to
collect their CPUID and Platform ID information. Hence, this commit will
move the copy, detect and apply of microcode patch on BSP and APs after
all the processors have been woken up.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934
0x0 MicrocodeBegin MicrocodeEntry MicrocodeEnd 0xffffffff
|--------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
valid TotalSize
TotalSize is only valid between 0 and (MicrocodeEnd - MicrocodeEntry).
So add '(UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize)' before
'((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd' to make sure
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) wouldn't overflow.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
Should make sure the TotalSize of Microcode is aligned with 4 bytes
before calling CalculateSum32 function.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The Microcode region indicated by MicrocodePatchAddress PCD may contain
more than one Microcode entry. We should save InCompleteCheckSum32 value
for each payload. Move the logic for calculate InCompleteCheckSum32 from
the outsize of the do-while loop to the inside.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The following Microcode payload format is define in SDM spec.
Payload: |MicrocodeHeader|MicrocodeBinary|ExtendedHeader|ExtendedTable|.
When we verify the CheckSum32 with ExtendedTable, we should use the fields
of ExtendedTable to replace corresponding fields in MicrocodeHeader,
and then calculate the CheckSum32 with MicrocodeHeader+MicrocodeBinary.
This patch already verified on ICL platform.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The SDM requires only one thread per core to load the
microcode.
This change enables this solution.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Search uCode costs much time, if AP has same processor type
with BSP, AP can use BSP saved uCode info to get better performance.
This change enables this solution.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
MicrocodeDetect function will run by every threads, and it will
use PcdGet to get PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and
PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize, if change both PCD default to dynamic,
system will in non-deterministic behavior.
By design, UEFI/PI services are single threaded and not re-entrant
so Multi processor code should not use UEFI/PI services. Here, Pcd
protocol/PPI is used to access dynamic PCDs so it would result in
non-deterministic behavior.
This code get PCD value in BSP and save them in CPU_MP_DATA for Ap.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726
Cc: Crystal Lee <CrystalLee@ami.com.tw>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Hao A Wu
Siyuan Fu
Zhichao Gao
Michael D Kinney
Chen A Chen
Eric Dong
Star Zeng
Jeff Fan