__FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among
others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99.
Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout
UefiCpuPkg.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the UefiCpuPkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
MpInitLib contains a function MicrocodeDetect() which is called by
all threads as an AP procedure.
Today this function contains below code:
if (CurrentRevision != LatestRevision) {
AcquireSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
DEBUG ((
EFI_D_ERROR,
"Updated microcode signature [0x%08x] does not match \
loaded microcode signature [0x%08x]\n",
CurrentRevision, LatestRevision
));
ReleaseSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
}
When the if-check is passed, the code may call into PEI services:
1. AcquireSpinLock
When the PcdSpinTimeout is not 0, TimerLib
GetPerformanceCounterProperties() is called. And some of the
TimerLib implementations would get the information cached in
HOB. But AP procedure cannot call PEI services to retrieve the
HOB list.
2. DEBUG
Certain DebugLib relies on ReportStatusCode services and the
ReportStatusCode PPI is retrieved through the PEI services.
DebugLibSerialPort should be used.
But when SerialPortLib is implemented to depend on PEI services,
even using DebugLibSerialPort can still cause AP calls PEI
services resulting hang.
It causes a lot of debugging effort on the platform side.
There are 2 options to fix the problem:
1. make sure platform DSC chooses the proper DebugLib and set the
PcdSpinTimeout to 0. So that AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG don't call
PEI services.
2. remove the AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG call from the procedure.
Option #2 is preferred because it's not practical to ask every
platform DSC to be written properly.
Following option #2, there are two sub-options:
2.A. Just remove the if-check.
2.B. Capture the CurrentRevision and ExpectedRevision in the memory
for each AP and print them together from BSP.
The patch follows option 2.B.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Commit c7c964b and dd01704 add header file for FIT table and update
MpInitLib to support FIT based microcode shadow operation. There are
comments that FIT is Intel specific specification instead of industry
standard, which should not be placed in EDK2 MdePkg and UefiCpuPkg.
So this patch adds a platform PPI for the microcode shadow logic, and
remove the FIT related code from EDK2.
The FIT based microcode shadow support will be implemented as a new
platform PEIM in IntelSiliconPkg in edk2-platforms.
This patch doesn't provide a DXE version shadow microcode protocol,
a platform which only uses DxeMpInitLib instance only supports PCD
based microcode shadowing.
A detailed design doc can be found here:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2020/0214/Support%20
the%202nd%20Microcode%20FV%20Flash%20Region.pdf
TEST: Tested on FIT enabled platform.
BZ: https://tianocore.acgmultimedia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465
Commit 89164babec:
UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: don't shadow the microcode patch twice.
attempted to use 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' and 'MicrocodePatchAddress'
fields to avoid loading the microcode patches data into memory again in
the DXE phase.
However, the CPU_MP_DATA structure has members with type 'UINTN' or
pointer before the microcode patch related fields. This may cause issues
when PEI and DXE are of different archs (e.g. PEI - IA32, DXE - x64),
since the microcode patch related fields will have different offsets in
the CPU_MP_DATA structure.
Commit 88bd066166:
UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA
tried to resolve the above-mentioned issue by relocating the fields
'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' and 'MicrocodePatchAddress' before members with
different size between different archs. But it failed to take the case of
pre-built binaries (e.g. FSP) into consideration.
Binaries can be built when the code base had a different version of the
CPU_MP_DATA structure definition. This may cause issues when accessing
these microcode patch related fields, since their offsets are different
(between PEI phase in the binaries and DXE phase in current code
implementation).
This commit will use the newly introduced EDKII microcode patch HOB
instead for the DXE phase to get the information of the loaded microcode
patches data done in the PEI phase. And the 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' and
'MicrocodePatchAddress' fields in CPU_MP_DATA will not be used to pass
information between phases.
For pre-built binaries, they can be classified into 3 types with regard to
the time when they are being built:
A. Before commit 89164babec
(In other words, 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' and 'MicrocodePatchAddress'
were not being used to skip microcode load in DXE)
For this case, the EDKII microcode patch HOB will not be produced. This
commit will load the microcode patches data again in DXE. Such behavior is
the same with the code base back then.
B. After commit 89164babec, before commit e1ed55738e
(In other words, 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' and 'MicrocodePatchAddress'
being used to skip microcode load in DXE, but failed to work properly
between differnt archs.)
For this case, the EDKII microcode patch HOB will not be produced as well.
This commit will also load the microcode patches data again in DXE.
But since commit 89164babec failed to keep the detection and application
of microcode patches working properly in DXE after skipping the load, we
fall back to the origin behavior (that is to load the microcode patches
data again in DXE).
C. After commit e1ed55738e
(In other words, EDKII microcode patch HOB will be produced.)
For this case, it will have the same behavior with the BIOS built from
the current source codes.
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2498
Commit fd30b00707 updated the logic in function MicrocodeDetect() that
will directly use the CPUID and PlatformID information from the 'CpuData'
field in the CPU_MP_DATA structure, instead of collecting these
information for each processor via AsmCpuid() and AsmReadMsr64() calls
respectively.
At that moment, this approach worked fine for APs. Since:
a) When the APs are waken up for the 1st time (1st MpInitLibInitialize()
entry at PEI phase), the function InitializeApData() will be called for
each AP and the CPUID and PlatformID information will be collected.
b) During the 2nd entry of MpInitLibInitialize() at DXE phase, when the
APs are waken up again, the function InitializeApData() will not be
called, which means the CPUID and PlatformID information will not be
collected. However, the below logics in MicrocodeDetect() function:
CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();
IsBspCallIn = (ProcessorNumber == (UINTN)CpuMpData->BspNumber) ? TRUE : FALSE;
if (CurrentRevision != 0 && !IsBspCallIn) {
//
// Skip loading microcode if it has been loaded successfully
//
return;
}
will ensure that the microcode detection and application will be
skipped due to the fact that such process has already been done in the
PEI phase.
But after commit 396e791059, which removes the above skip loading logic,
the CPUID and PlatformID information on APs will be used upon the 2nd
entry of the MpInitLibInitialize(). But since the CPUID and PlatformID
information has not been collected, it will bring issue to the microcode
detection process.
This commit will update the logic in MicrocodeDetect() back to always
collecting the CPUID and PlatformID information explicitly.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The existing MpInitLib will shadow the microcode update patches from
flash to memory and this is done by searching microcode region specified
by PCD PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize.
This brings a limition to platform FW that all the microcode patches must
be placed in one continuous flash space.
This patch shadows microcode update according to FIT microcode entries if
it's present, otherwise it will fallback to original logic (by PCD).
A new featured PCD gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuShadowMicrocodeByFit
is added for enabling/disabling this support.
TEST: Tested on FIT enabled platform.
BZ: https://tianocore.acgmultimedia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
This patch updates the microcode loader to always perform a microcode
detect and load on both BSP and AP processor. This is to fix a potential
microcode revision mismatch issue in below situation:
1. Assume there are two microcode co-exists in flash: one production
version and one debug version microcode.
2. FIT loads production microcode to BSP and all AP.
3. UefiCpuPkg loader loads debug microcode to BSP, and skip the loading
on AP.
As a result, different microcode patches are loaded to BSP and AP, and
trigger microcode mismatch error during OS boot.
BZ link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2431
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
This patch removes the unnecessary alignment check on microcode patch
TotalSize introduced by commit d786a172. The TotalSize has already been
checked with 1K alignment and MAX_ADDRESS in previous code as below:
if ( (UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize) ||
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd ||
(DataSize & 0x3) != 0 ||
(TotalSize & (SIZE_1KB - 1)) != 0 ||
TotalSize < DataSize
) {
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Previous commits have introduced below fields in structure CPU_AP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT8 PlatformId;
UINT64 MicrocodeEntryAddr;
which store the information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. Detected microcode patch entry address (including the microcode patch
header)
for each processor within system.
Therefore, the below fields in structure CPU_MP_DATA:
UINT32 ProcessorSignature;
UINT32 ProcessorFlags;
UINT64 MicrocodeDataAddress;
UINT32 MicrocodeRevision;
which store the BSP's information of:
A. CPUID
B. Platform ID
C. The address and revision of detected microcode patch
are redundant and can be removed.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2430
This commit will update the MpInitLib to:
A. Collect the base address and size information after microcode patches
being loaded into memory;
B. Collect the detected microcode patch for each processor within system;
C. Based on the collected information, produce the EDKII microcode patch
HOB.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429
This commit will attempt to reduce the copy size when loading the
microcode patches data from flash into memory.
Such optimization is done by a pre-process of the microcode patch headers
(on flash). A microcode patch will be loaded into memory only when the
below 3 criteria are met:
A. With a microcode patch header (which means the data is not padding data
between microcode patches);
B. The 'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlags' fields in the header match
at least one processor within system;
C. If the Extended Signature Table exists in a microcode patch, the
'ProcessorSignature' & 'ProcessorFlag' fields in the table entries
match at least one processor within system.
Criterion B and C will require all the processors to be woken up once to
collect their CPUID and Platform ID information. Hence, this commit will
move the copy, detect and apply of microcode patch on BSP and APs after
all the processors have been woken up.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1934
0x0 MicrocodeBegin MicrocodeEntry MicrocodeEnd 0xffffffff
|--------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
valid TotalSize
TotalSize is only valid between 0 and (MicrocodeEnd - MicrocodeEntry).
So add '(UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint > (MAX_ADDRESS - TotalSize)' before
'((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) > MicrocodeEnd' to make sure
((UINTN)MicrocodeEntryPoint + TotalSize) wouldn't overflow.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
Should make sure the TotalSize of Microcode is aligned with 4 bytes
before calling CalculateSum32 function.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The Microcode region indicated by MicrocodePatchAddress PCD may contain
more than one Microcode entry. We should save InCompleteCheckSum32 value
for each payload. Move the logic for calculate InCompleteCheckSum32 from
the outsize of the do-while loop to the inside.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
The following Microcode payload format is define in SDM spec.
Payload: |MicrocodeHeader|MicrocodeBinary|ExtendedHeader|ExtendedTable|.
When we verify the CheckSum32 with ExtendedTable, we should use the fields
of ExtendedTable to replace corresponding fields in MicrocodeHeader,
and then calculate the CheckSum32 with MicrocodeHeader+MicrocodeBinary.
This patch already verified on ICL platform.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The SDM requires only one thread per core to load the
microcode.
This change enables this solution.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Search uCode costs much time, if AP has same processor type
with BSP, AP can use BSP saved uCode info to get better performance.
This change enables this solution.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
MicrocodeDetect function will run by every threads, and it will
use PcdGet to get PcdCpuMicrocodePatchAddress and
PcdCpuMicrocodePatchRegionSize, if change both PCD default to dynamic,
system will in non-deterministic behavior.
By design, UEFI/PI services are single threaded and not re-entrant
so Multi processor code should not use UEFI/PI services. Here, Pcd
protocol/PPI is used to access dynamic PCDs so it would result in
non-deterministic behavior.
This code get PCD value in BSP and save them in CPU_MP_DATA for Ap.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726
Cc: Crystal Lee <CrystalLee@ami.com.tw>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Rebecca Cran
Michael Kubacki
Ray Ni
Siyuan Fu
Hao A Wu
Zhichao Gao
Michael D Kinney
Chen A Chen
Eric Dong
Star Zeng
Jeff Fan