Note that this test currently unintentionally passes, because a
TypeError is thrown for failing to convert the undefined returned from
the getter to a BigInt. But since this test was intended to test
detaching, it's no longer valid and should still be removed.
See https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/3465#issuecomment-1098388916
The round() and toString() methods of Temporal.Instant, PlainDateTime, and
ZonedDateTime can round up or down. However, the instance must not be
treated as "negative" even when the time is before 1 BCE (years are
negative) or before the Unix epoch (epoch nanoseconds are negative). That
is, rounding down is always towards the Big Bang, and rounding up is
always away from it. Add tests that verify this.
This takes the tests of the rounding functionality of
Temporal.PlainTime.p.toString() and adds similar tests covering the
equivalent functionality to Duration, Instant, PlainDateTime, and
ZonedDateTime: all the types that have rounding and precision controls
for how they output their subsecond values.
It also takes the opportunity to improve the existing PlainTime tests:
- fractionalseconddigits-auto.js: More descriptive variable names. Added
assertion messages.
- fractionalseconddigits-number.js: Ditto.
- rounding-cross-midnight.js: Use constructor directly to remove coupling
with from().
- roundingmode-*.js: Add additional tests for specifying the precision
using fractionalSecondDigits.
- smallestunit-fractionalseconddigits.js: Add assertion messages.
This consolidates the few existing tests for options bags in Temporal
being of the wrong type, and adds them for every entry point in Temporal
that accepts an options bag.
These are mostly identical tests, but there is a variation for methods
like round() where either an options bag or string is accepted.
Add a consistent set of invalid strings for all of the
smallestunit-invalid-string.js and largestunit-invalid-string.js tests:
- "era" and "eraYear" in singular and plural
- all of the units that are disallowed for that particular method call, in
singular and plural
- an allowed unit with \0 at the end
- an allowed unit with an "i" replaced by a dotless i
- an allowed unit but with all-caps
- an unrelated string.
Of the toString() methods that have options for printing a time with
seconds and fractional seconds, PlainTime seems to have the most
comprehensive set of tests. Bring all the others (Duration, Instant,
PlainDateTime, and ZonedDateTime) in sync with PlainTime, and edit the
PlainTime ones where necessary to include improvements from the others.
Tests:
- fractionalseconddigits-invalid-string.js: copy and expand on
PlainTime's more comprehensive set of invalid strings. Add assertion
message. Fix front matter.
- fractionalseconddigits-non-integer.js: Fix front matter.
- fractionalseconddigits-out-of-range.js: make sure infinity is tested.
Add assertion messages. Fix front matter.
- fractionalseconddigits-undefined.js: copy PlainTime's more
comprehensive test with whole minutes, whole seconds, and subseconds.
Copy PlainTime's test of an empty function object. Add more
descriptive variable names and assertion messages. Fix front matter.
- fractionalseconddigits-wrong-type.js: inline and delete TemporalHelper
used here; it was only good for this test anyway. Improve assertion
messages.
- smallestunit-valid-units.js: copy PlainTime's test with a second value
with zero seconds even. Refactor repetitive tests into a loop. Copy
the invalid unit "era" from the Instant test. Add assertion messages.
A prior version of ECMA262 described invalid mathematical operations
with infinite values [1]. Update the test metadata to reflect the
corrected specification text, and add two assertions for the obsolete
conditions.
[1] ".bind on a function with infinite length has imprecise spec and
engine divergences"
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/2170
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2003 is a normative change
that reached consensus at the March 2022 TC39 plenary meeting. This adds
tests that verify the new spec text is implemented correctly, performing
arithmetic on a PlainYearMonth instance that would previously have thrown
an error if it was implemented as written.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2090 is a normative change
that reached consensus at the March 2022 TC39 plenary meeting. This adds
tests that verify the change made to the formatting of years between 0 and
999 inclusive in all toString and toJSON methods of Temporal types that
can output an ISO year number in their return value.
(Philip, March 2022: This was originally Frank's PR #3057. I did some
reformatting, removed duplicate tests, addressed the review comments that
I left the first time around, and added some cases that I felt were not
yet complete.)
(Philip, March 2022: This was originally Frank's PR #3060. I did some
reformatting, removed a test that didn't exercise the whole feature, and
combined some duplicate tests with some existing tests.)
Where possible, observable calls originating from within Temporal, that
require an options argument, should pass `undefined` as that options
argument, rather than `{}` or `Object.create(null)`.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#1685.
These tests check API entry points that convert strings to
Temporal.PlainDate, with a list of various strings that are all not valid
for that context according to ISO 8601.
I'd like to add basic functionality tests for string arguments, and these
tests are testing something more specific: that a Get of the "overflow"
property on the passed-in options object is observable. Rename
accordingly.
* Create a Temporal.PlainDateTime with all arguments supplied.
Migrates some tests that currently exist in the
proposal-temporal repo.
* Check all data in Temporal.PlainDateTimes, variously constructed
Enrich existing tests to check all basic data in the
instance of `Temporal.PlainDateTime`, not just a single
field.
These additional checks were motivated by the migration of
existing Demitasse tests in the proposal-temporal repo to
test262. The Demitasse tests check more than a single
field.
Here's a test I should have included in #3395. It's allowed to replace the
"T" in the middle of an ISO string with a space, but not when the "T" is a
time designator prefix. This assertion ensures that implementations make
this distinction correctly.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1910 found a bug in an
indentation level of a line in the Temporal proposal, which affected the
outcome of the PreparePartialTemporalFields abstract operation. This adds
tests for all entry points that use that abstract operation, to make sure
the behaviour is correct: only defined properties are copied in with()
methods.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1956 clarified that the
fractionalSecondDigits and smallestUnit options to
Temporal.Duration.p.toString() specified the exact number of digits after
the decimal point, no more and no less.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1952 added support for time
designator prefixes in PlainTime strings. This adds three tests to all
entry points that convert an ISO string to a PlainTime:
- no-implicit-midnight: ISO strings with only a date and no time are no
longer accepted. Previously they were implicitly interpreted as 00:00.
- with-time-designator: Tests that various forms of string with time
designator are correctly parsed.
- time-designator-required-for-disambiguation: Tests various cases where
a string without a time designator is ambiguous and therefore the time
designator is required, as well as various cases that implementations
might assume are ambiguous but in fact are not.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1907 was a bug that caused
negative Duration strings with fractional units to be rounded incorrectly.
Add tests that ensure the rounding mode is correct.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
A follow up to the previous commit, this rewrites some tests that relied
on the lack of brand checks for certain Temporal.TimeZone methods.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1693 added brand checks to
these methods.
We can no longer use a plain object time zone or even a Proxy with a real
branded Temporal.TimeZone object as its handler to do these tests, so we
instead create an instance of Temporal.TimeZone and define own accessor
properties on it in order to test the observable property accesses that we
need to see according to the spec text.
This requires an improvement to TemporalHelpers.observeProperty() in order
to be able to log property accesses to Symbol-valued properties.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1693 added checks for the
receiver of certain Temporal.Calendar and Temporal.TimeZone methods. Add
branding tests for these methods, similar to the already existing branding
tests.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
These tests already existed for PlainDate. Copy them to the other types
(and use the constructor instead of from() in order to be as simple as
possible)
I forgot to add these to PlainDate, testing what happens when we pass
undefined as the value for the largestUnit option. Similar tests already
exist for the other types.
Some of these (in PlainDate) had already been rewritten to test more
invalid strings that are otherwise valid units. This commit takes these
improvements and brings them to all of the similar tests for other types'
since() and until() methods.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/1753 records the
consensus reached at the October 2021 TC39 meeting to disallow "-000000"
as an extended year, both in Date.parse and Temporal. This adds tests for
the Temporal part of that.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1893 was a bug that caused
the 'offset' property to be ignored in ZonedDateTime property bags. Add
tests that ensure it is not ignored.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the October 2021
TC39 meeting.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1780 fixed a typo in the
UnbalanceDurationRelative abstract operation, which should affect the
entry points tested here.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the October 2021
TC39 meeting.
This requires a few adjustments of time zone names and offsets in some
places. The only named time zone that is required to be supported by an
implementation not supporting ECMA-402 is "UTC".
Includes key should use flow notation to be able parsed easier
as suggested in https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/1997
Added this check to the linting script and updated tests accordingly.
Prior to this patch, the tests for certain Array prototype methods
incorrectly expected all elements to be "visited" even when a given
property was not present according to HasProperty.
Update the tests to reflect the fact that under such conditions, the
removed element is not visited.
In order to test this functionality on hosts that don't have Intl, we have
to use "UTC" and offset-only time zones here, as the full set of IANA time
zone names are not required to be supported across all hosts.
This makes some progress on https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/3253
Nails down intended behavior of `PlainDate` and
`PlainDateTime`'s `since` that is already true in the
polyfill but which was specified in a buggy way (and hence
potentially not true in an implementation of Temporal).
Add similar tests for Instant, PlainTime, PlainYearMonth, and
ZonedDateTime.
Reference:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1881
Tests for the normative changes made to Temporal in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1873
This adds a new Temporal helper calendar that asserts that its dateAdd()
method is always called with a PlainDate instance. This allows testing
that relativeTo parameters are always converted to PlainDate if they are
not ZonedDateTime and not undefined. Prior to the normative PR, they
would be converted to PlainDateTime instead.
Additionally and optionally, the helper calendar can also assert that its
dateAdd() method is called with a specific PlainDate instance. This allows
testing that the instance is the same PlainDate passed as the relativeTo
parameter (in the case of Duration methods) or is the receiver (in the
case of PlainDate methods). For the PlainDateTime and PlainYearMonth
methods the PlainDate instance is synthesized internally so there is no
need to assert that dateAdd() is called with a specific instance.
A number of tests were found to be duplicative based on an analysis of
file contents (included below). Eliminate the duplication by removing
the version of each test with less precise metadata. In cases where this
removal could technically be considered a reduction in coverage,
preserve the verification of additional semantics in the remaining test.
$ git grep -El 'new\s+\w+.prototype' | sed 's/[^\/]\+$//g' | sort | uniq -c | grep -vE '^\s+1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | xargs grep -Elr 'new\s+\w+.prototype'
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/join/S15.4.4.5_A6.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/join/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/pop/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/pop/S15.4.4.6_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/push/S15.4.4.7_A6.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/push/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/shift/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/shift/S15.4.4.9_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/slice/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/slice/S15.4.4.10_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/sort/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/sort/S15.4.4.11_A7.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/splice/S15.4.4.12_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/splice/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toLocaleString/S15.4.4.3_A4.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toLocaleString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toString/S15.4.4.2_A4.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/unshift/S15.4.4.13_A5.7.js
test/built-ins/Array/prototype/unshift/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/S15.3.4.3_A8_T1.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/S15.3.4.3_A8_T2.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/apply/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/S15.3.4.4_A7_T2.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/call/S15.3.4.4_A7_T1.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/toString/S15.3.4.2_A7.js
test/built-ins/Function/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/hasOwnProperty/S15.2.4.5_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/hasOwnProperty/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/propertyIsEnumerable/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/propertyIsEnumerable/S15.2.4.7_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toLocaleString/S15.2.4.3_A7.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toLocaleString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toString/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/toString/not-ctor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/valueOf/not-a-constructor.js
test/built-ins/Object/prototype/valueOf/S15.2.4.4_A7.js
Move part of the test of toLocaleString which depends on
15 Amendments to the ECMAScript® 2021 Internationalization API Specification
to intl402. Keep behavior specified in earlier chapters in built-ins
IANA TimeZone name other than "UTC" is only required if the implementation " includes the ECMA-402 Internationalization API"
https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/#sec-isvalidtimezonename
Therefore, we need to split the test and keep this one without checking "America/Vancouver"
Add a case to test withtout the ":"
Unfortunately, in #3304 I made a last-minute mistake when I added the
uncallable value to the assertion message, and neglected to test it;
Symbols can't be converted to strings like that, so these tests would
fail. This fixes the assertion messages.
Tests for the normative changes made to Temporal in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1875
For convenience, adds some functions to TemporalHelpers to assert that two
Temporal objects are equal, for Duration, Instant, PlainDateTime,
PlainTime, and ZonedDateTime.
Tests for the normative changes made to Temporal in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1829
In a previous version of the specification, there was a fallback to the
intrinsic getOffsetNanosecondsFor when it was undefined.
The Resizable ArrayBuffer proposal allows implementations to reject any
resize operation, so the tests must accommodate that possibility.
Mitigate the complexity this entails by minimizing branches and by
deferring assertions to locations with shallow call stacks.
The `arrayContains` function has a number of deficiencies which make it
inappropriate for Test262:
- It apparently isn't very useful: despite being available for over 7
years, fewer than ten tests use it
- It's misleading: its documentation reads, "Verify that a subArray is
contained within an array." In reality, it only verifies that all the
elements of one array are present in another--order does not matter.
- It's not ergonomic for test authors: it has been misused to create
tests that were prone to false positives [1]
- It's not ergonomic for implementers: ostensibly designed for use with
`assert`, the failure messages produced by tests that use it do not
necessarily have very much context
All code in the "harness" directory adds to the total amount of
project-specific information which contributors are expected to to
learn. In light of the above deficiencies, the burden of this particular
harness file is unjustified.
Remove the harness file and its associated tests. Update the tests which
depend on it to express their expectations using alternate methods, and
strengthen the tests to assert element order wherever appropriate.
[1] https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/3289
Prior to this patch, the modified test invoked the `arrayContains`
utility function without referencing its return value. Unlike Test262's
assertion functions, `arrayContains` does not throw an error when the
expectation is violated, so the prior usage did not influence test
results.
Additionally, the prior version of this test documented incorrect
expectations regarding the expected value produced by the method under
test. Due to the above, these expectations were not enforced.
Correct the test's expectations and enforce those expectations with a
function that will reliably produce an exception if violated.
Jesse Alama
Ms2ger
Shu-yu Guo
Philip Chimento
Jesse Alama
rwaldron
Mike Pennisi
Richard Gibson
Frank Tang
Iban Eguia Moraza
legendecas
Alexey Shvayka
Jesse Alama
Linus Groh
James Wright
Philip Chimento
Marko Lahma
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Csaba Osztrogonác
Kevin Gibbons
Mathias Bynens
Ms2ger
Joseph Griego
Justin Grant
Nicolò Ribaudo
Sarah GHP
Rick Waldron
Leo Balter
Neil Dhar
Phillip Mates