https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635
Currently, in order to test the supported attributes,
the PciTestSupportedAttribute() will set the command register
to 0x27 (EFI_PCI_COMMAND_IO_SPACE, EFI_PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY_SPACE,
EFI_PCI_COMMAND_BUS_MASTER, EFI_PCI_COMMAND_VGA_PALETTE_SNOOP) firstly,
and then read back to check whether these attributes are
set successfully in the device.
This will cause the other enabled bits
(other than EFI_PCI_COMMAND_IO_SPACE,EFI_PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY_SPACE,
EFI_PCI_COMMAND_BUS_MASTER,EFI_PCI_COMMAND_VGA_PALETTE_SNOOP)
be cleared for a short of time
This patch fixes this issue by keeping the origina
enabled bits when setting 0x27.
Signed-off-by: xueshengfeng <xueshengfeng@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2989
Long times spent on shadowing oprom from graphics card to system memory.
We are currently using 8 bit read cycles. This needs to be wider,
at least 32bit reads to reduce the time for oprom shadow.
Signed-off-by: Sumana Venur <sumana.venur@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
If the function gets invalid value for the `ResizableBarOp` parameter
and asserts are disabled, `Bit` can be used uninitialized.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Dmitrouk <sergei@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The ProcessOptionRomLight() assumes that OpRom has already been
processed in the previous full enumeration and updates
AllOpRomProcessed flag to TRUE by default. However, this may not
be applicable with other pre-stage boot firmwares.
This will update AllOpRomProcessed flag properly by checking
PciRomGetImageMapping().
Signed-off-by: Aiden Park <aiden.park@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3149
Address MEM64 BAR in type unknown if sizing fail in high 32bit.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zarcd Zhong <zarcd.zhong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313
Add PcdPcieResizableBarSupport to enable/disable PCIe Resizable
BAR Capability fearture.
Program the Resizable BAR Register if the device suports PCIe Resizable
BAR Capability and PcdPcieResizableBarSupport is TRUE.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Heng Luo <heng.luo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2515
Change the MdeModulePkg to match the ECC check rule
Signed-off-by: GuoMinJ <newexplorerj@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
Whenever a PCI device is discovered, PCI bus calls the
EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL to authenticate it.
If the function returns success, the PCI bus allocates
the resource and installs the PCI_IO for the device.
If the function returns fail, the PCI bus skips the device.
It is similar to EFI_SECURITY_ARCH_PROTOCOL, which
is used to verify an EFI image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Yun Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Unlike the InstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service, which takes
an (EFI_HANDLE*) as first parameter, the
UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service takes an EFI_HANDLE as
first parameter.
These are actual bugs. They must have remained hidden until now because
they are on error paths. Fix the UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces()
calls.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796
Bug fixed in PciBusDxe\PciLib.c.
Removed the redundant second call to PciSearchDevice sub-routine when the
PCD for the Hot-Plug support is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Ashraf Javeed <Ashraf.javeed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
When assigning a physical PCIe device to a QEMU/KVM guest, PciBusDxe may
find that the extended config space is not (fully) implemented. In
LocatePciExpressCapabilityRegBlock(), "CapabilityEntry" may be read as
0xFFFF_FFFF at a given config space offset, after which the loop gets
stuck spinning on offset 0xFFC (the read at offset 0xFFC returns
0xFFFF_FFFF most likely as well).
Another scenario (not related to virtualization) for triggering the above
is when a Conventional PCI bus -- exposed by a PCIe-to-PCI bridge in the
topology -- intervenes between a PCI Express Root Port and a PCI Express
Endpoint. The Conventional PCI bus limits the accessible config space of
the PCI Express Endpoint, even though the endpoint advertizes the PCI
Express capability. Here's a diagram, courtesy of Alex Williamson:
[PCIe Root Port]--[PCIe-to-PCI]--[PCI-to-PCIe]--[PCIe EP]
->| |<- Conventional PCI bus
Catch reads of 0xFFFF_FFFF in LocatePciExpressCapabilityRegBlock(), and
break out of the scan with a warning message. The function will return
EFI_NOT_FOUND.
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Delete the explicit machine type check for option ROM images, and instead,
rely on the LoadImage() boot service to decide whether an option ROM can
be dispatched or not. This permits platforms to ship with emulators to
execute option ROMs that are not native to the processor architecture.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505
When a device under PPB contains option ROM but doesn't require 32bit
MMIO, ProgrameUpstreamBridgeForRom() cannot correctly restore the
PPB MEM32 RANGE BAR. It causes the 32bit MMIO conflict which may
cause system hangs in boot.
The root cause is when ProgrameUpstreamBridgeForRom() calls
ProgramPpbApperture() to restore the PPB MEM32 RANGE BAR, the
ProgramPpbApperture() skips to program the BAR when the resource
length is 0.
This patch fixes this issue by not calling ProgramPpbApperture().
Instead, it directly programs the PPB MEM32 RANGE BAR.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Per PCI Spec, the option ROM BAR is 32bit so the maximum option ROM
size can be hold by UINT32 type.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1394
When there is no PCI option ROM exists, today's logic still creates
virtual BAR for option ROM using Length = 0, Alignment = (-1).
It causes the final MEM32 alignment requirement is as big as
0xFFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF.
The patch fixes this issue by only creating virtual BAR for option
ROM when there is PCI option ROM.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Chiu Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1376
Today's implementation reuses the 32bit MMIO resource requested by
all PCI devices MMIO BARs when shadowing the option ROM.
Take a simple example, a system has only one PCI device. It requires
8MB 32bit MMIO and contains a 4MB option ROM. Today's implementation
only requests 8MB (max of 4M and 8M) 32bit MMIO from
PciHostBridgeResourceAllocation protocol. Let's assume the MMIO range
[3GB, 3GB+8MB) is allocated. The 3GB base address is firstly
programmed to the option ROM BAR for option ROM shadow. Then the
option ROM decoding is turned off and 3GB base address is programmed
to the 32bit MMIO BAR.
It doesn't cause issues when the device doesn't request too much
MMIO.
But when the device contains a 64bit MMIO BAR which requests 4GB MMIO
and a 4MB option ROM. Let's assume [3GB, 3GB+8MB) 32bit MMIO range is
allocated for the option ROM. When the option ROM is being shadowed,
64bit MMIO BAR is programmed to value 0, which means [0, 4GB) MMIO is
given to the 64bit BAR.
The range overlaps with the option ROM range which may cause the
device malfunction (e.g.: option ROM cannot be read out) when the
device has two separate decoders: one for MMIO BAR, the other for
option ROM.
The patch requests dedicated MEM32 resource for Option ROMs and
moves the Option ROM shadow logic after all MMIO BARs are programmed.
The MMIO BAR setting to 0 when shadowing Option ROM is also skipped
because the MMIO BAR already contains the correct value.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109
Today's restriction of VGA device is to have only one VGA device
enabled per PCI segment. It's not correct because several segments
may share one IO / MMIO address space.
We should restrict to have one VGA per Host Bridge because each
Host Bridge has its only IO / MMIO address space.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109
The patch doesn't change any behavior of this function.
It just renames the function to LocateVgaDevice() and renames
some parameters and local variables.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The functions that are never called have been removed.
They are UpStreamBridgesAttributes and GetHpcPciAddressFromRootBridge.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
When cleaning the PciIoDevice, also free the BusNumberRange
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Per PCIE spec, Memory Write and Invalidate is hardwired to 0b so
PciBus driver shouldn't write 1b to it.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
CreatePciIoDevice() detects whether the PCI device is a PCI Express
device and remembers the device type in PciIoDevice->IsPciExp.
RegisterPciDevice() detects the device type again which is
unnecessary. The detection logic can be removed.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Current code assumes the max bus(0xFF) is under this P2P bridge and
temporarily set it as subordinate bus.
It may cause silicon hangs during PCI enumeration in some specific
case.
Instead, it should get the max bus number from the bus number
resources returned from
PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_ALLOCATION.StartBusEnumeration() and set it
as subordinate bus.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec 2.7, PciIo->GetBarAttributes should return host
address (CPU view ddress) rather than device address (PCI view
address), and
device address = host address + address translation offset,
so we subtract translation from device address before returning.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
According to UEFI spec 2.7, PciRootBridgeIo->Configuration() should
return host address (CPU view ddress) rather than device address
(PCI view address), so in function GetMmioAddressTranslationOffset we
need to convert the range to device address before comparing.
And device address = host address + translation offset.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Initialize local variable to suppress warning C4703:
potentially uninitialized local pointer variable.
Both reads (dereferences) of "PciRootBridgeIo" in
PciBusDriverBindingStart() are only reached if
"gFullEnumeration" is TRUE on entry *and* we successfully
open the EfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocol interface.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Per PI spec, the PciEnumerationComplete protocol installation
should be after PciIo installation.
Today's implementation installs the PciEnumerationComplete
after hardware enumeration is completed, but before PciIo
installation.
The change corrects the spec/implementation gap.
The change also benefits certain implementation that depends on
the PciIo handle in PciEnumerationComplete callback.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch is just a code cleanup with no functionality impact.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
EBC compiler doesn't treat EFI_xxx as constant due to these macros
are UINT64 type in 64bit env and UINT32 type in 32bit env.
So it reports error when "case EFI_xxx" is used.
The patch changes to use if-else to fix EBC build failure.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE is missing in the EFI_UNSUPPORTED
return status description.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
This reverts commit 5db417ed25.
"MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: Enable Bus Master on P2P bridges on demand"
We met some compatibility issues when doing Windows S4 resume.
Reverting the BME disabling patches to fix the S4 resume issue.
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <Ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Turner <michael.turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <Michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
This reverts commit 050763db07.
"MdeModulePkg/PciBus: Disable BME of all devices when entering RT"
We met some compatibility issues when doing Windows S4 resume.
Reverting the BME disabling patches to fix the S4 resume issue.
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <Ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Turner <michael.turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <Michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The patch ensures all DMA transactions are blocked after
ExitBootService.
If a platform enables IOMMU before and needs disable IOMMU after
ExitBootService, the IOMMU should be disabled after PCI bus driver
disables BME.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael Turner <michael.turner@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>
It's a regression of below commit:
SHA-1: 8be37a5cee
* MdeModulePkg/SecurityStubDxe: Defer 3rd party image before EndOfDxe
When PciBus driver fails to load the Option ROM, it doesn't produce
BusOverride protocol. It was a correct behavior before the above
commit. But due to the above commit, BusOverride protocol never is
produced by PciBus driver.
The patch fixes this issue using the following solution:
1. PciBus records the image device path when LoadImage fails.
2. Override.GetDriver() tries to look for the image handle using
the stored image device path.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch shouldn't impact functionality.
Original code records the ImageHandle of Option ROM by creating a
new entry. It's not necessary.
The patch updates the ImageHandle in the old entry.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch doesn't impact real functionality.
It only renames EFI_PCI_ROM_IMAGE_MAPPING to PCI_ROM_IMAGE,
and changes prototype of PciRomAddImageMapping so that
no explicit type cast is needed when calling this function.
It also removes unused field RomBase from PCI_IO_DEVICE structure.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The bug was caused by 728d74973c
"MdeModulePkg/PciBus: Count multiple hotplug resource paddings".
The patch firstly updated the Bridge->Alignment to the maximum
alignment of all devices under the bridge, then aligned the
Bridge->Length to Bridge->Alignment.
It caused too much resources were claimed.
The new patch firstly aligns Bridge->Length to Bridge->Alignment,
then updates the Bridge->Alignment to the maximum alignment of all
devices under the bridge.
Because the step to update the Bridge->Alignment is to make sure
the resource allocated to the bus under the Bridge meets all
devices alignment. But the Bridge->Length doesn't have to align
to the maximum alignment.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720
The current implementation assumes there is only one hotplug resource
padding for each resource type. It's not true considering
DegradeResource(): MEM64 resource could be degraded to MEM32
resource.
The patch treat the resource paddings using the same logic as
treating typical/actual resources and the total resource of a bridge
is set to the MAX of typical/actual resources and resource paddings.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The patch dynamically enables Bus Master on P2P bridges only
when requested by a device driver through PciIo.Attribute() to enable
the Bus Master.
Signed-off-by: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
PciScanBus() assumes the GetResourcePadding() puts BUS descriptor
in the very beginning, if it's not, the Descriptors will be updated
to point to middle of the pool buffer, which can cause
FreePool(Descriptors) hang in DEBUG image.
No functionality impact to RELEASE image.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
If IOMMU protocol is installed, PciBus need call IOMMU
to set access attribute for the PCI device in Map/Ummap.
Only after the access attribute is set, the PCI device can
access the DMA memory.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Previous patch Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Previous patch Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
xueshengfeng
Sumana Venur
Sergei Dmitrouk
Aiden Park
Zarcd Zhong
Luo, Heng
GuoMinJ
Jiewen Yao
Laszlo Ersek
Javeed, Ashraf
Ard Biesheuvel
Michael D Kinney
Ray Ni
Ruiyu Ni
Chen A Chen
shenglei
Thomas Palmer
Liming Gao
Heyi Guo
Dandan Bi
Star Zeng
Hao Wu