The motivation of this change is to simplify the logic in
StandaloneMmIpl when allocating the memory for SMM profile data.
IPL does not need to detect the CPU feature regarding MSR DS
Area. That change requires the PCD value contains the MSR DS
Area. So, the size of SmmProfileData will be simplified to the
PcdCpuSmmProfileSize directly.
mMsrDsAreaSize will be within the PcdCpuSmmProfileSize if
mBtsSupported is TRUE.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
For MM, gMmProfileDataHobGuid Memory Allocation HOB is defined to
indicate SMM profile feature enabled or not. If the HOB exist, SMM
profile base address and size will be returned in the HOB, so no need
to consume the PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable feature PCD to check enable or
disable.
To achieve above purpose, Add the IsSmmProfileEnabled () function.
With this change, Both MM and SMM can use the new function for
SMM profile feature check.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
This patch is to refine the updatePageTable logic for DxeSmm.
For DxeSmm, PageTable will be updated in the first SMI when SMM
ready to lock happen:
IF SMM Profile is TRUE:
1. Mark mProtectionMemRange attribute: SmrrBase:Present, SMM
profile base:Present&Nx, MMRAM ranges:Present, MMIO ranges:
Present&Nx.
2. Mark the ranges not in mProtectionMemRange as RP (non-present).
IF SMM Profile is FALSE:
1. Mark Non-MMRAM ranges as NX.
2. IF RestrictedMemoryAccess is TRUE:
Forbidden Address mark as RP (IsUefiPageNotPresent is TRUE).
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
SMM Profile start can be started early in SMM CPU EntryPoint
since page table for SMM profile is ready.
No need wait smm ready to lock.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
For MM:
CodeAccessCheck is designed to enable in the MM CPU Driver Entry
Point.
For SMM:
CodeAccessCheck is still enabled in the first SMI when SMM ready
to lock happen.
This patch enables the CodeAccessCheck in MM CPU Driver Entry
Point for MM support.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
For MM:
Since all accessible NON-MMRAM memory and attribute shall be in
ResourceDescriptor HOBs for MM, the page table for MM can be finalized
and created in the default Page.
For SMM:
There are still 2 steps for the finalized default Page:
1. Create default Page
2. update the page table in the first SMI when SMM ready to lock
happen
This patch to refactor the GenSmmPageTable() function to create the
default Page Table for Both SMM and MM:
1. Create NonMmram MemoryRegion
2. Gen NonMmram MemoryRegion PageTable
3. Gen MMRAM Range PageTable
4. Consider PcdCpuSmmStackGuard & PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask
cases.
Meanwhile, mXdSupported needs to be initialized before GenSmmPageTable since
it's required by GenSmmPageTable function. So, move the mXdSupported init
from CheckFeatureSupported to the common EntryPoint function.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
According Standalone MM design, all accessible NON-MMRAM memory shall
be in ResourceDescriptor HOBs. So, This patch consumes the Resource
HOBs to create extended protection MemoryRegion and add them into
protected memory ranges.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
MM can not call the EfiLocateFirstAcpiTable(), so, move the
function into DxeSmm Code. This will make InitSmmProfileCallBack()
to be common function for both SMM and MM.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
MM can not use the gDS service, so move the extended protection
MemRegion creation into function. This can make InitProtectedMemRange()
to be a common function for both SMM and MM.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
MM can not use the gBS service, so move SMM profile data allocation
into function. This can make InitSmmProfileInternal() to a common
function for both SMM and MM.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
MM can not use the gRT service, so use SMM Variable protocol to
set SmmProfileBase instead of gRT->SetVariable for both SMM and
MM.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
Rename the file PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h to PiSmmCpuCommon.h to facilitate
common usage in both SMM and MM. The renamed file PiSmmCpuCommon.h
will be utilized for both modes in subsequent patches.
No function impact.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
This patch update the gSmst to gMmst for SMM and MM common
usage.
No function impact.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Hongbin1 Zhang <hongbin1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Yuanhao Xie <yuanhao.xie@intel.com>
In this commit, we rename IsAddressValid function to
IsSmmProfilePFAddressAbove4GValid and remove unneeded
code logic in it.
Currently, IsAddressValid is only used in the function
RestorePageTableAbove4G. It's used to identify if a SMM
profile PF address above 4G is inside mProtectionMemRange
or not. So we can remove the PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable FALSE
condition related code logic in it. Also the function name
is change to be more detailed and specific.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Remove unneeded calling of SmmProfileMapPFAddress () in
SmmProfileMapPFAddress if SMM profile is not started.
Previously, before SMM profile is started at ReadyToLock,
SMM page table only covers [0, 4G]. The access to the range
above 4G will cause PF. SmmProfileMapPFAddress is needed
here to map the PF address before SMM profile is started.
Now we always create full mapping SMM page table in the
SmmInitPageTable(). When SMM profile is enabled, before
SMM profile is started at ReadyToLock, SMM page table
covers [0, MaxSupportedPhysicalAddress]. So the case that
access to the range above 4G causes PF won't happen
anymore.
Then we can remove the calling of SmmProfileMapPFAddress
before SMM profile is started.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Rename SmiDefaultPFHandler to SmiProfileMapPFAddress
and move the implementation to SmmProfileArch.c since
it only will be used when SMM profile is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
In this commit, we always create full mapping SMM page
table in SmmInitPageTable regardless the value of the
PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess.
Previously, when PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess is false,
only [0, 4G] is mapped in smm page table in SmmInitPageTable.
If the range above 4G is accessed in SMM, SmiPFHandler will
create new paging entry for the accessed range. To simplify
the code logic, we also create full mapping SMM page table
in SmmInitPageTable when PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess is
false. Then we don't need to dynamic create paging entry for
range above 4G except SMM profile is enabled.
The comparison of SMM page table before and after the change
under different configuration are listed here:
1.PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess is TRUE
No change
2.PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess is FALSE and
PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable is TRUE
Before: the SMM page table when ReadyToLock covers
1. SMRAM range 2.SMM profile range
3. MMIO range below 4G
After: the SMM page table when ReadyToLock covers
1. SMRAM range 2.SMM profile range
3. MMIO range below 4G and above 4G
3.PcdCpuSmmRestrictedMemoryAccess is FALSE and
PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable is FALSE
Before: the SMM page table when ReadyToLock covers
[0, 4G]
After: the SMM page table when ReadyToLock covers
[0, MaxSupportPhysicalAddress]
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
This reverts commit bef0d333dc "UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm:
Fix system hang when SmmProfile enable".
The commit bef0d333dc was added to modify the code logic in
InitPaging() to fix a code assert issue. Previously, the root
cause of this issue is that we try to only set NX attribute
for not-present MMIO range above 4G when SMM profile feature
is enabled, which is not allowed by CpuPageTableLib.
But after we always create full mapping initial SMM page
table in the next commit, this code assert issue won't happen
anymore since MMIO range above 4g will also be present in SMM
page table before InitPaging().
Meanwhile another issue was introduced by commit bef0d333dc:
In the entrypoint of PiSmmCpuDxe driver, we will set some
pages in stack range as not-present in SMM page table if
PcdCpuSmmStackGuard or PcdControlFlowEnforcementPropertyMask
is TRUE. But in commit bef0d333dc, all SMRAM range are set
to present in InitPaging() if SMM profile is enabled. Then
the stack guard and shadow stack features do not work anymore.
So let's revert the commit "UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix
system hang when SmmProfile enable"
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Before the commit 701b5797 & 4ceefd6d, 2MB-page will be created to
cover [0: 4G] by default if SmmProfile enabled, and it will be go
through to change 2MB-page into 4KB-page during page table update
(InitPaging). If so, there was no problem to assert PDE entry exist
in the RestorePageTableBelow4G.
But after above commits, PageTableMap API is used to create/update
the page table, 1G-page will be the default page table mode, and
only covers the limited address range. Those not covered ranges
will be marked as non-present in 1g-page level address. If so,
2M-page address might not exist, it's incorrect to assert PDE
entry exist in the RestorePageTableBelow4G.
The correct behavior should check PDE entry exist or not, if not,
PDE should be allocated and assigned to PDPTE.
Note:
RestorePageTableBelow4G () does not use 1G page size entries
for the creation of new pages, maintaining consistency with the
behavior of the original code.
The purpose of this patch is to ensure that a Page Directory Entry
(PDE) exists prior to its usage.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
There is a bug in the existing code: the single step is always enabled
once the Page Fault (#PF) occurs, but it is only disabled when the SMM
Profile feature actually starts (see DebugExceptionHandler).
If the SMM Profile feature has not been started, this will result in
the single-step mode remaining enabled if a Page Fault occurs.
This patch is to enable the single-step debugging mode by setting the
Trap Flag only after SmmProfile feature starts.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
This commit is to fix smm code assert issue when SMM Profile
is enabled.
When SMM Profile is enabled, the function InitProtectedMemRange()
retrives MMIO ranges from GCD and store the MMIO ranges in the
mProtectionMemRange. When ReadyToLock, the function InitPaging()
modifies the page table based on the mProtectionMemRange. If the
MMIO ranges in mProtectionMemRange is not 4k aligned, code will
assert when modifying page table.
In this commit, we skip the MMIO ranges that BaseAddress and Length
are not 4k aligned when creating mProtectionMemRange. This will only
cause each access to the skipped MMIO range to be logged. In current
failure case on QEMU and QSP SimicsOpenBoard, the skipped MMIO range
is [0xFED00000, 0xFED00400] for HPET. Considering that the probability
of HPET MMIO range being accessed is very small in SMM, the solution
in this commit is acceptable and simple.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
MMIO ranges within the mProtectionMemRange array may exceed 4G
and should be configured as 'Present & NX'. However, the initial
attribute for these MMIO addresses in the page table is
'non-present'. Other attributes should not be set or updated for
a non-present range if the present bit mask is zero, as this could
result in an error during the InitPaging for the page table update
process.
This patch is to resolve the error to make sure MMIO page table
can be configured correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Root cause:
1. Before DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, the return
address (#1) is pushed in shadow stack.
2. CET is disabled.
3. DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to #1.
4. Page table is modified.
5. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() is called, but the return
address (#2) is not pushed in shadow stack.
6. CET is enabled.
7. EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect() returns to #2.
#CP exception happens because the actual return address (#2)
doesn't match the return address stored in shadow stack (#1).
Analysis:
Shadow stack will stop update after CET disable (DisableCet() in
DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect), but normal smi stack will be
continue updated with the function called and return
(DisableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect & EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect),
thus leading stack mismatch after CET re-enabled (EnableCet() in
EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect).
According SDM Vol 3, 6.15-Control Protection Exception:
Normal smi stack and shadow stack must be matched when CET enable,
otherwise CP Exception will happen, which is caused by a near RET
instruction.
CET is disabled in DisableCet(), while can be enabled in
EnableCet(). This way won't cause the problem because they are
implemented in a way that return address of DisableCet() is
poped out from shadow stack (Incsspq performs a pop to increases
the shadow stack) and EnableCet() doesn't use "RET" but "JMP" to
return to caller. So calling EnableCet() and DisableCet() doesn't
have the same issue as calling DisableReadonlyPageWriteProtect()
and EnableReadonlyPageWriteProtect().
With above root cause & analysis, define below 2 macros instead of
functions for WP & CET operation:
WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES (Wp, Cet)
Because DisableCet() & EnableCet() must be in the same function
to avoid shadow stack and normal SMI stack mismatch.
Note: WRITE_UNPROTECT_RO_PAGES () must be called pair with
WRITE_PROTECT_RO_PAGES () in same function.
Change-Id: I4e126697efcd8dbfb4887da034d8691bfca969e3
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Zeng Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
This commit is code refinement to current smm runtime InitPaging()
page table update code. In InitPaging(), if PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable
is TRUE, use ConvertMemoryPageAttributes() API to map the range in
mProtectionMemRange to the attrbute recorded in the attribute field
of mProtectionMemRange, map the range outside mProtectionMemRange
as non-present. If PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable is FALSE, only need to
set the ranges not in mSmmCpuSmramRanges as NX.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Sort mProtectionMemRange in InitProtectedMemRange() when
ReadyToLock.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Clear CR0.WP before modify smm page table. Currently, there is
an assumption that smm pagetable is always RW before ReadyToLock.
However, when AMD SEV is enabled, FvbServicesSmm driver calls
MemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask to clear AddressEncMask bit
in smm page table for this range:
[PcdOvmfFdBaseAddress,PcdOvmfFdBaseAddress+PcdOvmfFirmwareFdSize]
If page slpit happens in this process, new memory for smm page
table is allocated. Then the newly allocated page table memory
is marked as RO in smm page table in this FvbServicesSmm driver,
which may lead to PF if smm code doesn't clear CR0.WP before
modify smm page table when ReadyToLock.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
In function InitPaging, NumberOfPml5Entries is calculated by below code
NumberOfPml5Entries = (UINTN)LShiftU64 (1, SizeOfMemorySpace - 48);
If the SizeOfMemorySpace is larger than 48, NumberOfPml5Entries will be
larger than 1. However, this doesn't make sense if the hardware doesn't
support 5 level page table.
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the UefiCpuPkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
Update all use of EFI_D_* defines in DEBUG() macros to DEBUG_* defines.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3584
Function AsmCpuid should first check the value for Basic CPUID Information.
The fix is to update the mPatchCetSupported judgment statement.
Signed-off-by: Wenxing Hou <wenxing.hou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Sheng W <w.sheng@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
AMD does not support MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE. Accessing that register
causes and exception on AMD processors. If Execution Disable is
supported, but if the processor is an AMD processor, skip manipulating
MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE[34] XD Disable bit.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Garrett Kirkendall <garrett.kirkendall@amd.com>
Message-Id: <20200622131825.1352-5-Garrett.Kirkendall@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
In commit 4eee0cc7cc ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpu: Enable 5 level paging when
CPU supports", 2019-07-12), the Page Directory Entry setting was regressed
(corrupted) when splitting a 2MB page to 512 4KB pages, in the
InitPaging() function.
Consider the following hunk, displayed with
$ git show --function-context --ignore-space-change 4eee0cc7cc
> //
> // If it is 2M page, check IsAddressSplit()
> //
> if (((*Pd & IA32_PG_PS) != 0) && IsAddressSplit (Address)) {
> //
> // Based on current page table, create 4KB page table for split area.
> //
> ASSERT (Address == (*Pd & PHYSICAL_ADDRESS_MASK));
>
> Pt = AllocatePageTableMemory (1);
> ASSERT (Pt != NULL);
>
> + *Pd = (UINTN) Pt | IA32_PG_RW | IA32_PG_P;
> +
> // Split it
> - for (PtIndex = 0; PtIndex < SIZE_4KB / sizeof(*Pt); PtIndex++) {
> - Pt[PtIndex] = Address + ((PtIndex << 12) | mAddressEncMask | PAGE_ATTRIBUTE_BITS);
> + for (PtIndex = 0; PtIndex < SIZE_4KB / sizeof(*Pt); PtIndex++, Pt++) {
> + *Pt = Address + ((PtIndex << 12) | mAddressEncMask | PAGE_ATTRIBUTE_BITS);
> } // end for PT
> *Pd = (UINT64)(UINTN)Pt | mAddressEncMask | PAGE_ATTRIBUTE_BITS;
> } // end if IsAddressSplit
> } // end for PD
First, the new assignment to the Page Directory Entry (*Pd) is
superfluous. That's because (a) we set (*Pd) after the Page Table Entry
loop anyway, and (b) here we do not attempt to access the memory starting
at "Address" (which is mapped by the original value of the Page Directory
Entry).
Second, appending "Pt++" to the incrementing expression of the PTE loop is
a bug. It causes "Pt" to point *right past* the just-allocated Page Table,
once we finish the loop. But the PDE assignment that immediately follows
the loop assumes that "Pt" still points to the *start* of the new Page
Table.
The result is that the originally mapped 2MB page disappears from the
processor's view. The PDE now points to a "Page Table" that is filled with
garbage. The random entries in that "Page Table" will cause some virtual
addresses in the original 2MB area to fault. Other virtual addresses in
the same range will no longer have a 1:1 physical mapping, but be
scattered over random physical page frames.
The second phase of the InitPaging() function ("Go through page table and
set several page table entries to absent or execute-disable") already
manipulates entries in wrong Page Tables, for such PDEs that got split in
the first phase.
This issue has been caught as follows:
- OVMF is started with 2001 MB of guest RAM.
- This places the main SMRAM window at 0x7C10_1000.
- The SMRAM management in the SMM Core links this SMRAM window into
"mSmmMemoryMap", with a FREE_PAGE_LIST record placed at the start of the
area.
- At "SMM Ready To Lock" time, PiSmmCpuDxeSmm calls InitPaging(). The
first phase (quoted above) decides to split the 2MB page at 0x7C00_0000
into 512 4KB pages, and corrupts the PDE. The new Page Table is
allocated at 0x7CE0_D000, but the PDE is set to 0x7CE0_E000 (plus
attributes 0x67).
- Due to the corrupted PDE, the second phase of InitPaging() already looks
up the PTE for Address=0x7C10_1000 in the wrong place. The second phase
goes on to mark bogus PTEs as "NX".
- PiSmmCpuDxeSmm calls SetMemMapAttributes(). Address 0x7C10_1000 is at
the base of the SMRAM window, therefore it happens to be listed in the
SMRAM map as an EfiConventionalMemory region. SetMemMapAttributes()
calls SmmSetMemoryAttributes() to mark the region as XP. However,
GetPageTableEntry() in ConvertMemoryPageAttributes() fails -- address
0x7C10_1000 is no longer mapped by anything! -- and so the attribute
setting fails with RETURN_UNSUPPORTED. This error goes unnoticed, as
SetMemMapAttributes() ignores the return value of
SmmSetMemoryAttributes().
- When SetMemMapAttributes() reaches another entry in the SMRAM map,
ConvertMemoryPageAttributes() decides it needs to split a 2MB page, and
calls SplitPage().
- SplitPage() calls AllocatePageTableMemory() for the new Page Table,
which takes us to InternalAllocMaxAddress() in the SMM Core.
- The SMM core attempts to read the FREE_PAGE_LIST record at 0x7C10_1000.
Because this virtual address is no longer mapped, the firmware crashes
in InternalAllocMaxAddress(), when accessing (Pages->NumberOfPages).
Remove the useless assignment to (*Pd) from before the loop. Revert the
loop incrementing and the PTE assignment to the known good version.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789335
Fixes: 4eee0cc7cc
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1946
The patch changes SMM environment to use 5 level paging when CPU
supports it.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7365eb2c8c)
This reverts commit 7365eb2c8c.
Commit
7c5010c7f8 MdePkg/BaseLib.h: Update IA32_CR4 structure for 5-level paging
technically breaks the EDKII development process documented in
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Development-Process
and Maintainers.txt in EDKII repo root directory.
The voilation is commit 7c5010c7f8 doesn't have a Reviewed-by or
Acked-by from MdePkg maintainers.
In order to revert 7c5010c7f8, 7365eb2c8 needs to revert first otherwise
simply reverting 7c5010c7f8 will cause build break.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1946
The patch changes SMM environment to use 5 level paging when CPU
supports it.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Per SDM, for IA-32e 4-KByte paging, there are four layers in the page
table structure:
1. PML4
2. Page-Directory-Pointer Table (PDPT)
3. Page-Directory (PD)
4. Page Table (PT)
The patch changes the local variable names and comments to use
"PML4", "PDPT", "PD", "PT" to better align to terms used in SDM.
There is no functionality impact for this change.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1521
We scan the SMM code with ROPgadget.
http://shell-storm.org/project/ROPgadget/https://github.com/JonathanSalwan/ROPgadget/tree/master
This tool reports the gadget in SMM driver.
This patch enabled CET ShadowStack for X86 SMM.
If CET is supported, SMM will enable CET ShadowStack.
SMM CET will save the OS CET context at SmmEntry and
restore OS CET context at SmmExit.
Test:
1) test Intel internal platform (x64 only, CET enabled/disabled)
Boot test:
CET supported or not supported CPU
on CET supported platform
CET enabled/disabled
PcdCpuSmmCetEnable enabled/disabled
Single core/Multiple core
PcdCpuSmmStackGuard enabled/disabled
PcdCpuSmmProfileEnable enabled/disabled
PcdCpuSmmStaticPageTable enabled/disabled
CET exception test:
#CF generated with PcdCpuSmmStackGuard enabled/disabled.
Other exception test:
#PF for normal stack overflow
#PF for NX protection
#PF for RO protection
CET env test:
Launch SMM in CET enabled/disabled environment (DXE) - no impact to DXE
The test case can be found at
https://github.com/jyao1/SecurityEx/tree/master/ControlFlowPkg
2) test ovmf (both IA32 and X64 SMM, CET disabled only)
test OvmfIa32/Ovmf3264, with -D SMM_REQUIRE.
qemu-system-x86_64.exe -machine q35,smm=on -smp 4
-serial file:serial.log
-drive if=pflash,format=raw,unit=0,file=OVMF_CODE.fd,readonly=on
-drive if=pflash,format=raw,unit=1,file=OVMF_VARS.fd
QEMU emulator version 3.1.0 (v3.1.0-11736-g7a30e7adb0-dirty)
3) not tested
IA32 CET enabled platform
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=967
Request to add a library function for GetAcpiTable() in order
to get ACPI table using signature as input.
After evaluation, we found there are many duplicated code to
find ACPI table by signature in different modules.
This patch updates PiSmmCpuDxeSmm to use new
EfiLocateFirstAcpiTable() and remove the duplicated code.
Cc: Younas khan <pmdyounaskhan786@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Since SMM profile feature has already implemented non-stop mode if #PF
occurred, this patch just makes use of the existing implementation to
accommodate heap guard and NULL pointer detection feature.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
"mXdSupported" is a global BOOLEAN variable, initialized to TRUE. The
CheckFeatureSupported() function is executed on all processors (not
concurrently though), called from SmmInitHandler(). If XD support is found
to be missing on any CPU, then "mXdSupported" is set to FALSE, and further
processors omit the check. Afterwards, "mXdSupported" is read by several
assembly and C code locations.
The tricky part is *where* "mXdSupported" is allocated (defined):
- Before commit 717fb60443 ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add paging
protection.", 2016-11-17), it used to be a normal global variable,
defined (allocated) in "SmmProfile.c".
- With said commit, we moved the definition (allocation) of "mXdSupported"
into "SmiEntry.nasm". The variable was defined over the last byte of a
"mov al, 1" instruction, so that setting it to FALSE in
CheckFeatureSupported() would patch the instruction to "mov al, 0". The
subsequent conditional jump would change behavior, plus all further read
references to "mXdSupported" (in C and assembly code) would read back
the source (imm8) operand of the patched MOV instruction as data.
This trick required that the MOV instruction be encoded with DB.
In order to get rid of the DB, we have to split both roles: we need a
label for the code patching, and "mXdSupported" has to be defined
(allocated) independently of the code patching. Of course, their values
must always remain in sync.
(1) Reinstate the "mXdSupported" definition and initialization in
"SmmProfile.c" from before commit 717fb60443. Change the assembly
language definition ("global") to a declaration ("extern").
(2) Define the "gPatchXdSupported" label (type X86_ASSEMBLY_PATCH_LABEL)
in "SmiEntry.nasm", and add the C-language declaration to
"SmmProfileInternal.h". Replace the DB with the MOV mnemonic (keeping
the imm8 source operand with value 1).
(3) In CheckFeatureSupported(), whenever "mXdSupported" is set to FALSE,
patch the assembly code in sync, with PatchInstructionX86().
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> v2:
> Reduce the number of page to update/restore from 3 to 2 because DF
> has no effect in this issue.
The infinite loop is caused by the memory instruction, such as
"rep mov", operating on memory block crossing boundary of NON-PRESENT
pages. Because the address triggering page fault set in CR2 will be in
the first page, SmmProfilePFHandler() will only change the first page
into PRESENT. The page following will be still in NON-PRESENT status.
Since SmmProfilePFHandler() will setup single-step trap for the
instruction causing #PF, when the handler returns back to the
instruction and re-execute it, both #DB and #PF will be triggered
because the instruction wants to access both first and second page
but only first page is PRESENT.
Normally #DB exception will be handled first and its handler will
change first page back to NON-PRESENT status. Then #PF is handled
and its handler will change first page to PRESENT status again and
setup another single-step for the instruction triggering #PF. Then
the whole system falls into an infinite loop and the memory operation
will never move on.
This patch fix above situation by always changing 2 pages to PRESENT
status instead of just 1 page. Those 2 pages include the page causing
#PF and the page after it.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
SmmProfile feature required to protect all SMM ranges by structure
mProtectionMemRangeTemplate. This update is to add additonal save SMM ranges
into mProtectionMemRangeTemplate besides the range specified by
mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase/mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSiz.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Internal function IsInSmmRanges() is added t check SMM range by saved SMM ranges
beside by mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrBase/mCpuHotPlugData.SmrrSiz.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
This PCD holds the address mask for page table entries when memory
encryption is enabled on AMD processors supporting the Secure Encrypted
Virtualization (SEV) feature.
The mask is applied when page tables entriees are created or modified.
CC: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
"UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec" already allows platforms to make
PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber dynamic, however PiSmmCpuDxeSmm does not
take this into account everywhere. As soon as a platform turns the PCD
into a dynamic one, at least S3 fails. When the PCD is dynamic, all
PcdGet() calls translate into PCD DXE protocol calls, which are only
permitted at boot time, not at runtime or during S3 resume.
We already have a variable called mMaxNumberOfCpus; it is initialized in
the entry point function like this:
> //
> // If support CPU hot plug, we need to allocate resources for possibly
> // hot-added processors
> //
> if (FeaturePcdGet (PcdCpuHotPlugSupport)) {
> mMaxNumberOfCpus = PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber);
> } else {
> mMaxNumberOfCpus = mNumberOfCpus;
> }
There's another use of the PCD a bit higher up, also in the entry point
function:
> //
> // Use MP Services Protocol to retrieve the number of processors and
> // number of enabled processors
> //
> Status = MpServices->GetNumberOfProcessors (MpServices, &mNumberOfCpus,
> &NumberOfEnabledProcessors);
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> ASSERT (mNumberOfCpus <= PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber));
Preserve these calls in the entry point function, and replace all other
uses of PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber -- there are only reads -- with
mMaxNumberOfCpus.
For PcdCpuHotPlugSupport==TRUE, this is an unobservable change.
For PcdCpuHotPlugSupport==FALSE, we even save SMRAM, because we no longer
allocate resources needlessly for CPUs that can never appear in the
system.
PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber is also retrieved in
"UefiCpuPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c", but only in
the library instance constructor, which runs even before the entry point
function is called.
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Once platform selects the incorrect instance, the caller could know it from
return status and ASSERT().
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Jiaxin Wu
Dun Tan
Ray Ni
Zhiguang Liu
Michael Kubacki
Michael D Kinney
Wenxing Hou
Kirkendall, Garrett
Laszlo Ersek
Jiewen Yao
Star Zeng
Jian J Wang
Jeff Fan
Leo Duran